Scanned sites / plausible.io

SEO report for plausible.io DR 90

The latest Site Spider scan of plausible.io, with 12 scans on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/plausible-io/2026-10-16-0843.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-10-16 08:43:13 UTC, finished 2026-10-16 08:59:58 UTC. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory

Site: https://plausible.io/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

75/ 100Good

On October 16, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 455 pages and 578 assets of plausible.io, starting from https://plausible.io/. It scored 75 out of 100, a good result. 13 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (45), broken links (85), title tags (147); 4 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), broken links (−4.8), title tags (−4.1). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: not available for this scan.

Pages crawled
455
Assets fetched
578
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

1,033 of 1,034 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 404 left unchecked.

  • Title tags147 issues
    147 of 290 pages have title issues. 66 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.1 points
  • Meta descriptions155 issues
    155 of 290 pages have meta description issues. 66 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.5 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 290 pages have heading issues. 66 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links85 issues
    85 internal links point at 85 broken URLs.
    −4.8 points
  • Links to other sites11 issues
    11 destinations answered with an error, 69 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 404 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −1.2 points
  • Redirects13 issues
    14 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses85 issues
    101 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 99 of them are pages, 85 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −2.4 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability4 issues
    4 of 291 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 65 pages noindex by design.
    −0.1 points
  • Image alt text165 issues
    165 of 1647 image references have no alt attribute. 165 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.6 points
  • Heavy assets45 issues
    45 assets larger than 500 KB among 578 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages9 issues
    9 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage131 issues
    1 sitemap listing 165 URLs: 125 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 5 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.2 points
  • Internal link counts35 noted
    Internal link counts for 356 pages; 35 worth a look.
  • Thin content6 issues
    6 of 290 pages have fewer than 200 words. 66 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format61 noted
    61 of 455 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals69 noted
    69 of 356 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives65 noted
    65 pages carry a robots directive; 291 carry none.
  • Anchor text35 noted
    35 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure68 noted
    68 of 290 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 66 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length301 noted
    296 images over 100 KB; 5 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies4 noted
    4 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404s2 noted
    2 pages answer 200 but say they are not there.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    2 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 1033 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 356 pages; 248 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

What changed since the last scan

Score unchanged

plausible.io scored 75 out of 100 in both of its last two scans. That is a steady score, not an unchanged site: 46 findings changed between the two scans. 20 URLs the earlier crawl reached were not reached this time. The crawl reached 1 more page than last time, 455 in total, so some of the change is a change in what was crawled. Across 12 scans on record the score has ended up where it started, at 75.

  • Pages: 1 new
  • Internal links to the page: 45 changed
  • 20 URLs from the earlier crawl were not reached this time
  1. 2026-09-19 04:11:46 UTC75/100446 pages
  2. 2026-09-22 04:47:38 UTC75/100446 pages
  3. 2026-09-25 05:10:04 UTC75/100447 pages
  4. 2026-09-28 05:42:45 UTC75/100447 pages
  5. 2026-10-01 06:00:31 UTC75/100451 pages
  6. 2026-10-04 07:14:03 UTC75/100452 pages
  7. 2026-10-07 07:36:30 UTC75/100452 pages
  8. 2026-10-10 07:57:25 UTC75/100454 pages
  9. 2026-10-13 08:18:35 UTC75/100454 pages
  10. 2026-10-16 08:43:13 UTC75/100455 pages

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2284 sites, median 79%, average 78%

plausible.io scores 75%, higher than 32% of the 2284 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 7 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 45 sites70%: 41 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 65 sites74%: 70 sites75%: 71 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 104 sites79%: 87 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 106 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 95 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 84 sites86%: 67 sites87%: 71 sites88%: 62 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 34 sites93%: 20 sites94%: 14 sites95%: 10 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 9 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 0 sites100%: 70 sites75% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Earlier scans of plausible.io

Sites scoring near plausible.io

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling plausible.io from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own plausible.io?