Scanned sites / www.yafacafe.com

SEO report for www.yafacafe.com DR 9

The latest Site Spider scan of www.yafacafe.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/www-yafacafe-com/2026-09-14-0557.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-14 05:57:41 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 07:00:41 UTC. Found on page 4 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.yafacafe.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

57/ 100Needs work

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 478 pages and 1147 assets of www.yafacafe.com, starting from https://www.yafacafe.com/. It scored 57 out of 100, a result that needs work. 11 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (402), thin content (393), title tags (287); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.1), thin content (−7), title tags (−6.3). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
478
Assets fetched
1147
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,625 of 1,721 discovered URLs were fetched, 95 blocked by robots.txt, 885 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 304 link destinations on other sites were checked, 158 left unchecked.

  • Title tags287 issues
    287 of 427 pages have title issues. 25 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.3 points
  • Meta descriptions402 issues
    402 of 427 pages have meta description issues. 25 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.1 points
  • Headings241 issues
    241 of 427 pages have heading issues. 25 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.2 points
  • Broken links3 issues
    8 internal links point at 3 broken URLs.
    −0.1 points
  • Links to other sites46 issues
    46 destinations answered with an error, 234 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 158 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −4 points
  • Redirects23 issues
    156 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses3 issues
    167 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 26 of them are pages, 3 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 427 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 25 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 5467 image references have no alt attribute. 2138 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets73 issues
    73 assets larger than 500 KB among 1147 fetched assets. 5 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages376 issues
    376 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −3.3 points
  • Sitemap coverage399 issues
    7 sitemaps listing 450 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 23 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 376 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −5.3 points
  • Internal link counts37 noted
    Internal link counts for 452 pages; 37 worth a look.
  • Thin content393 issues
    393 of 427 pages have fewer than 200 words. 25 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format101 noted
    101 of 478 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals25 noted
    25 of 452 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives452 noted
    452 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text48 noted
    48 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure142 noted
    142 of 427 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 25 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length67 noted
    66 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies136 noted
    136 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 452 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 1625 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 452 pages; 407 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 61 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2811 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.yafacafe.com scores 57%, higher than 4% of the 2811 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0661310%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 16 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 42 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 41 sites69%: 51 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 78 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 128 sites79%: 110 sites80%: 126 sites81%: 123 sites82%: 131 sites83%: 120 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 93 sites87%: 94 sites88%: 78 sites89%: 74 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 56 sites92%: 42 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 127 sites57% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website needs attention in several areas, especially broken links, redirects, and content issues. Prioritize these fixes to improve user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links hinder user experience and SEO.

    How: Update internal links pointing to the 3 broken URLs.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: Excessive redirects can slow down your site and lead to poor user experience.

    How: Consolidate or remove the 156 redirecting URLs.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: 167 URLs returning non-200 responses can harm SEO.

    How: Fix or remove these URLs to ensure they return a 2xx status.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Enhance Title Tags

    Why: 257 title issues can cause confusion for users and search engines.

    How: Revise titles to meet best practices (length and uniqueness).

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Update Meta Descriptions

    Why: 401 pages with meta description issues affect visibility and click-through rates.

    How: Create unique and compelling meta descriptions for affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Improve Headings Structure

    Why: 241 heading issues can reduce content clarity and SEO performance.

    How: Add appropriate H1 tags to missing pages and organize headings properly.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has medium-security issues needing attention: lack of HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) and a publicly exposed Google API key. Third-party scripts risk compromising site integrity without proper controls. Review sensitive paths in robots.txt for access management.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted during connections without HTTPS.

    Fix: Implement the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: An exposed API key can be misused, potentially incurring costs or rate limits.

    Fix: Restrict the API key in the Google Cloud console by HTTP referrer to ensure it's used only by your domains.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  3. 3

    Uncontrolled Third-Party ScriptsLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains may change without notice, posing a security risk.

    Fix: Consider implementing Subresource Integrity (SRI) or a strong Content-Security-Policy specifying allowed sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  4. 4

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Public listing of sensitive paths could aid attackers in probing the site.

    Fix: Remove sensitive paths from robots.txt or implement proper access controls to restrict access.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.yafacafe.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.yafacafe.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.yafacafe.com/careers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.yafacafe.com/aknowledgements/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.yafacafe.com/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.yafacafe.com/embroidery/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.yafacafe.com/menu/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.yafacafe.com/order-delivery/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.yafacafe.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.yafacafe.com/legal/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.yafacafe.com/gallery/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.yafacafe.com/knafeh-authentic-palestinian-dessert/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…s0 (39 chars) in https://www.yafacafe.com/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • c0.wp.com (120 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (120 script tags)
    • stats.wp.com (40 script tags)
    • www.instagram.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 195 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /cgi-bin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-includes/
    • Disallow: /cgi-bin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-includes/
    • Disallow: /cgi-bin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-includes/
    • Disallow: /cgi-bin/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-includes/
8 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 452 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 452 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 452 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    92 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of www.yafacafe.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near www.yafacafe.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.yafacafe.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.yafacafe.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.yafacafe.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.