Scanned sites / www.wearpotatoes.com

SEO report for www.wearpotatoes.com DR 4

The latest Site Spider scan of www.wearpotatoes.com, with 6 scans on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/www-wearpotatoes-com/2026-09-15-1900.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-15 19:00:30 UTC, finished 2026-09-15 19:01:40 UTC

Site: http://www.wearpotatoes.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

21/ 100Poor

On September 15, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 8 pages and 58 assets of www.wearpotatoes.com, starting from http://www.wearpotatoes.com/. It scored 21 out of 100, a poor result. 9 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by broken links (6), non-200 responses (6), title tags (2); 13 checks passed. Most of the points went to broken links (−20), title tags (−10), non-200 responses (−10). 4 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: High1 high, 4 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
8
Assets fetched
58
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

66 of 66 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript.

  • Title tags2 issues
    2 of 2 pages have title issues.
    −10 points
  • Meta descriptions2 issues
    2 of 2 pages have meta description issues.
    −8 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 2 pages have heading issues.
  • Broken links6 issues
    12 internal links point at 6 broken URLs.
    −20 points
  • Links to other sitesNot checked
    Not checked: the crawl fetched nothing this check can look at.
  • RedirectsOK
    0 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses6 issues
    8 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 6 of them are pages, 6 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −10 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 2 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −10 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 12 image references have no alt attribute. 12 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 58 fetched assets.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage1 issue
    No sitemap found. Tried: http://www.wearpotatoes.com/sitemap.xml (404). Add one at /sitemap.xml or list it in robots.txt.
    −3 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 2 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content2 issues
    2 of 2 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −8 points
  • Duplicate content8 issues
    2 groups of pages with identical HTML.
    −8 points
  • URL formatOK
    All 8 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 2 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directivesOK
    No page carries a robots directive; all 2 pages are open to search engines.
  • Anchor text2 noted
    2 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure2 noted
    2 of 2 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 2 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 7 response headers recorded across 66 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 2 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights2 noted
    Mobile performance 63 on average across 2 pages; 2 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

What changed since the last scan

Score unchanged

www.wearpotatoes.com scored 21 out of 100 in both of its last two scans. Across 5 scans on record the score has ended up where it started, at 21.

  1. 2026-09-14 18:00:01 UTC21/1008 pages
  2. 2026-09-15 17:11:10 UTC21/1008 pages
  3. 2026-09-15 17:37:05 UTC21/1008 pages
  4. 2026-09-15 18:03:29 UTC21/1008 pages
  5. 2026-09-15 19:00:30 UTC21/1008 pages

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2343 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.wearpotatoes.com scores 21%, higher than 0% of the 2343 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0591170%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 4 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 72 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 117 sites83%: 101 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 88 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 46 sites92%: 39 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites21% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several urgent issues like broken links and missing metadata that need to be fixed. Addressing these will improve user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 12 internal links point to broken URLs, harming user experience.

    How: Identify and update or remove broken URLs in your content.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 8 URLs are returning 404 errors, affecting accessibility.

    How: Update links to these pages or create new pages if content is needed.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Both pages have short and duplicate title tags impacting search visibility.

    How: Create unique and descriptive title tags for each page, aiming for 50-60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions are missing, which can lower click-through rates.

    How: Craft compelling meta descriptions of around 150 characters for both pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Implement a Sitemap

    Why: No sitemap found; this can hinder search engine indexing.

    How: Create a sitemap.xml and add the URL in your robots.txt file.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  6. 6

    Improve Content Quality

    Why: Pages have fewer than 200 words, affecting SEO.

    How: Enrich your content with relevant information to exceed 200 words.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security issues, including unencrypted HTTP access, missing security headers, outdated JavaScript libraries, and a publicly exposed API key. Addressing these will help protect your users and data.

  • 1 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    HTTP URLs DetectedHigh

    Why it matters: Two pages are served over unencrypted HTTP, allowing interception of data.

    Fix: Implement HTTPS by obtaining an SSL certificate and configuring your server to redirect HTTP traffic to HTTPS.

    Evidence: HTTPS

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows scripts and resources to be loaded from any origin, enhancing risk of cross-site scripting.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, your pages can be embedded in frames, increasing clickjacking risk.

    Fix: Set the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Outdated JavaScript LibrariesMedium

    Why it matters: Using outdated libraries like jQuery and Bootstrap poses security risks due to known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to 3.5.0, Bootstrap to 3.4.1, and Select2 to 4.0.6.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Exposed API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: A Google API key found in your code could be abused if it is not restricted by referrer.

    Fix: Restrict the API key in the Google Cloud console to your domain.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  6. 6

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Absence of X-Content-Type-Options may allow the browser to misinterpret content types.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  7. 7

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Without a Referrer-Policy, full URLs may be shared when users navigate away from your site.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  8. 8

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Not using a Permissions-Policy means unnecessary features are exposed, which could be exploited by malicious scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(none), microphone=(none), camera=(none).

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTPSHigh

    2 pages answered 200 over plain HTTP with no redirect to HTTPS. Anyone on the network path can read or alter these pages.

    • http://www.wearpotatoes.com/ → 200 over http
    • http://www.wearpotatoes.com/index.html → 200 over http
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 2 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • http://www.wearpotatoes.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • http://www.wearpotatoes.com/index.html → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • http://www.wearpotatoes.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • http://www.wearpotatoes.com/index.html → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • http://www.wearpotatoes.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • http://www.wearpotatoes.com/index.html → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • http://www.wearpotatoes.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • http://www.wearpotatoes.com/index.html → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • http://www.wearpotatoes.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • http://www.wearpotatoes.com/index.html → no permissions-policy
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    3 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.11.3, Bootstrap 3.3.6, Select2 4.0.2. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.11.3 in http://www.wearpotatoes.com/js/core.min.js: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
    • Bootstrap 3.3.6 in http://www.wearpotatoes.com/js/core.min.js: CVE-2016-10735, CVE-2018-14040, CVE-2018-14041, CVE-2018-14042, CVE-2019-8331 (XSS through data attributes in tooltip, popover, collapse and scrollspy); fixed in 3.4.1
    • Select2 4.0.2 in http://www.wearpotatoes.com/js/core.min.js: CVE-2016-10744 (XSS in rich selection lists); fixed in 4.0.6
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…ZM (39 chars) in http://www.wearpotatoes.com/js/script.js: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
3 checks passed, 5 not applicable
  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • Not applicableHTTP Strict Transport Security

    No page was served over HTTPS, so this header does not apply yet.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableMixed content

    No page was served over HTTPS, so mixed content does not apply yet.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

  • Not applicableSensitive paths in robots.txt

    No robots.txt was fetched.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of www.wearpotatoes.com

Sites scoring near www.wearpotatoes.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.wearpotatoes.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.wearpotatoes.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.wearpotatoes.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.