Scanned sites / www.tsoralhealth.com / 2026-10-04-0653

www.tsoralhealth.com scan from 10/4/2026, 6:53:31 AM

Scan 2026-10-04-0653

Scanned 10/4/2026, 6:53:31 AM, finished 10/4/2026, 6:57:27 AM. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.tsoralhealth.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On October 4, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 43 pages and 80 assets of www.tsoralhealth.com, starting from https://www.tsoralhealth.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 16 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (25), image alt text (5), title tags (8); 4 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.7), image alt text (−3.8), title tags (−2.7). 3 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Low2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
43
Assets fetched
80
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 16
CoverageComplete crawl

123 of 124 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 29 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags8 issues
    8 of 29 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −2.7 points
  • Meta descriptions25 issues
    25 of 29 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −6.7 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 29 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites56 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 26 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 29 destinations checked.
  • Redirects15 issues
    13 redirecting URLs, 4 of them chained.
    −2 points
  • Non-200 responses14 noted
    14 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 13 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 29 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
  • Image alt text5 issues
    5 of 8 image references have no alt attribute. 2 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −3.8 points
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 80 fetched assets.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pages4 issues
    4 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.5 points
  • Sitemap coverage5 issues
    1 sitemap listing 28 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 4 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 30 pages.
  • Thin content2 issues
    2 of 29 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.5 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2057 sites, median 80%, average 78%

www.tsoralhealth.com scores 82%, higher than 59% of the 2057 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0511020%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 2 sites38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 1 site41%: 2 sites42%: 0 sites43%: 1 site44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 4 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 2 sites49%: 4 sites50%: 4 sites51%: 3 sites52%: 9 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 6 sites56%: 6 sites57%: 7 sites58%: 14 sites59%: 6 sites60%: 11 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 16 sites63%: 20 sites64%: 18 sites65%: 30 sites66%: 24 sites67%: 41 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 25 sites70%: 43 sites71%: 48 sites72%: 65 sites73%: 54 sites74%: 58 sites75%: 75 sites76%: 82 sites77%: 77 sites78%: 97 sites79%: 82 sites80%: 102 sites81%: 102 sites82%: 102 sites83%: 90 sites84%: 86 sites85%: 73 sites86%: 73 sites87%: 70 sites88%: 66 sites89%: 51 sites90%: 37 sites91%: 42 sites92%: 29 sites93%: 18 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 7 sites96%: 7 sites97%: 8 sites98%: 1 site99%: 2 sites100%: 56 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Several areas need improvement, particularly focusing on redirects, title tags, meta descriptions, and orphan pages. These issues can enhance overall SEO performance and user accessibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects and Non-200 Responses

    Why: Resolve 13 redirects and 14 non-200 responses to improve page access and user experience.

    How: Update URLs and remove chains; ensure all pages return a 2xx status.

    Checks: redirects, status-codes

  2. 2

    Address Title Tag Issues

    Why: Improve click-through rates with optimized title tags on 8 pages to enhance visibility in search results.

    How: Revise and shorten titles to under 60 characters based on best practices.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Enhancing 25 meta descriptions can boost user engagement and search visibility.

    How: Write and add unique descriptions for each missing entry, limiting to 160 characters.

    Evidence: 18 pages have no meta description at all.

    18 pages affected

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Add Missing Headings

    Why: Correct heading issues to improve accessibility and SEO on 1 page.

    How: Add an H1 tag to the affected page to ensure proper structure.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Assign Internal Links to Orphan Pages

    Why: Link 4 orphan pages internally to increase their discoverability.

    How: Add relevant internal links to these pages from existing high-traffic pages.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Reducing heavy asset sizes can improve page load times and user experience.

    How: Compress or serve assets under 500 KB, prioritizing CSS and images as indicated.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security review indicates a few low-severity findings that need attention. These include version disclosures in headers and the use of third-party scripts without sufficient integrity checks. Additionally, sensitive paths listed in the robots.txt file may increase the risk of probing attacks.

  • 0 high
  • 0 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Exact server version information is provided, enabling attackers to exploit known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Remove the 'X-Powered-By' header or set it to a generic value. For example, `X-Powered-By: My Application`. Ensure that server banners do not disclose version details.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  2. 2

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Lack of Subresource Integrity allows malicious alterations of scripts from other domains without detection.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) attributes on all third-party scripts or use a Content-Security-Policy to specify trusted sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Sensitive Paths Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The presence of private paths in the robots.txt file could guide potential attackers in probing the site.

    Fix: Remove sensitive paths from the robots.txt file or enforce proper access controls to these endpoints.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: cloudflare (123 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Rocket/3.21.1 (2 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (30 script tags)
    • ajax.googleapis.com (30 script tags)
    • www.google.com (31 script tags)
    • form.jotform.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
10 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 30 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 30 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.tsoralhealth.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.tsoralhealth.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.tsoralhealth.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.tsoralhealth.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.
www.tsoralhealth.com scan 2026-10-04-0653 | DIY SEO Hub