Scanned sites / www.tsoralhealth.com / 2026-09-28-0903

www.tsoralhealth.com scan from 9/28/2026, 9:03:19 AM

Scan 2026-09-28-0903

Scanned 9/28/2026, 9:03:19 AM, finished 9/28/2026, 9:07:30 AM. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.tsoralhealth.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On September 28, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 44 pages and 85 assets of www.tsoralhealth.com, starting from https://www.tsoralhealth.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 16 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (24), image alt text (2), title tags (7); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.6), image alt text (−4), title tags (−2.4). 2 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Low2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
44
Assets fetched
85
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 16
CoverageComplete crawl

129 of 130 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 29 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags7 issues
    7 of 28 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −2.4 points
  • Meta descriptions24 issues
    24 of 28 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −6.6 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 28 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites55 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 26 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 29 destinations checked.
  • Redirects16 issues
    14 redirecting URLs, 4 of them chained.
    −2.2 points
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    16 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 15 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.3 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 28 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
  • Image alt text2 issues
    2 of 3 image references have no alt attribute. 1 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −4 points
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 85 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages4 issues
    4 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.6 points
  • Sitemap coverage5 issues
    1 sitemap listing 27 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 4 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 29 pages.
  • Thin content2 issues
    2 of 28 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.6 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

1325 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.tsoralhealth.com scores 82%, higher than 57% of the 1325 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

037740%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 1 site36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 1 site39%: 0 sites40%: 0 sites41%: 0 sites42%: 0 sites43%: 0 sites44%: 0 sites45%: 2 sites46%: 2 sites47%: 2 sites48%: 2 sites49%: 2 sites50%: 3 sites51%: 4 sites52%: 6 sites53%: 5 sites54%: 5 sites55%: 4 sites56%: 3 sites57%: 5 sites58%: 9 sites59%: 5 sites60%: 8 sites61%: 10 sites62%: 13 sites63%: 11 sites64%: 8 sites65%: 14 sites66%: 14 sites67%: 26 sites68%: 25 sites69%: 14 sites70%: 30 sites71%: 29 sites72%: 37 sites73%: 32 sites74%: 41 sites75%: 37 sites76%: 49 sites77%: 45 sites78%: 57 sites79%: 46 sites80%: 65 sites81%: 74 sites82%: 68 sites83%: 60 sites84%: 60 sites85%: 46 sites86%: 50 sites87%: 45 sites88%: 49 sites89%: 35 sites90%: 28 sites91%: 31 sites92%: 19 sites93%: 8 sites94%: 10 sites95%: 5 sites96%: 7 sites97%: 3 sites98%: 1 site99%: 1 site100%: 49 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The site has several SEO issues that would benefit from immediate attention. Key focus areas include fixing redirects, improving title tags and meta descriptions, and addressing orphan pages. Address these priorities for better visibility and performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Chained and unnecessary redirects waste crawl budget and can impact rankings.

    How: Identify and eliminate chained redirects, ensuring all URLs point directly to the final destination.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 16 URLs returning errors can harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Review and fix the pages and assets; replace or redirect as needed.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Inconsistent title tags can reduce click-through rates in search results.

    How: Revise 7 problematic titles to be within recommended length and include relevant keywords.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing or long meta descriptions negatively impact search visibility.

    How: Create concise and compelling meta descriptions for 17 pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages aren't discoverable by users or search engines.

    How: Add internal links to 4 orphaned pages from relevant existing content.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Improve Thin Content

    Why: Pages with low word counts may not provide enough value for rankings.

    How: Enhance content on 2 thin pages to exceed 200 words with relevant details.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has a few security issues that need attention, including revealing software versions and running third-party scripts without proper safeguards. There's also a sensitive path listed in robots.txt that could provide attackers with useful information.

  • 0 high
  • 0 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Revealing server or framework versions can allow attackers to exploit known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Remove the 'Server' and 'X-Powered-By' headers or configure them to not disclose version numbers.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  2. 2

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Running scripts from multiple domains without SRI increases the risk of compromised scripts affecting your site.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity for all external scripts or add a Content-Security-Policy that restricts script sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file may disclose sensitive paths to attackers, thereby aiding in probing efforts.

    Fix: Ensure sensitive paths have proper access controls and evaluate the need to disclose them in robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: cloudflare (129 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Rocket/3.21.1 (2 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (29 script tags)
    • ajax.googleapis.com (29 script tags)
    • www.google.com (30 script tags)
    • form.jotform.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
10 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 29 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 29 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 29 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 29 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 29 HTML pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 29 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.tsoralhealth.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.tsoralhealth.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.tsoralhealth.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.tsoralhealth.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.
www.tsoralhealth.com scan 2026-09-28-0903 | DIY SEO Hub