Scanned sites / www.tmlawyers.com / 2026-11-02-1531

www.tmlawyers.com scan from 2026-11-02 15:31:01 UTC DR 35

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-02-1531

Scanned 2026-11-02 15:31:01 UTC, finished 2026-11-02 17:10:04 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.tmlawyers.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

78/ 100Good

On November 2, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 1160 pages and 998 assets of www.tmlawyers.com, starting from https://www.tmlawyers.com/. It scored 78 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (568), title tags (452), heavy assets (8); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−6.1), meta descriptions (−6.1), heavy assets (−4.8). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 3 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
1160
Assets fetched
998
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 33
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

2,158 of 2,164 discovered URLs were fetched, 53 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 26 left unchecked.

  • Title tags452 issues
    452 of 580 pages have title issues. 161 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.1 points
  • Meta descriptions568 issues
    568 of 580 pages have meta description issues. 161 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.1 points
  • Headings6 issues
    6 of 580 pages have heading issues. 161 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links3 issues
    8 internal links point at 3 broken URLs.
    −0.1 points
  • Links to other sites12 issues
    12 destinations answered with an error, 151 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 26 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.6 points
  • Redirects435 issues
    417 redirecting URLs, 21 of them chained.
    −2.3 points
  • Non-200 responses3 issues
    420 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 419 of them are pages, 3 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability67 issues
    67 of 741 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.9 points
  • Image alt text1 issue
    1 of 10021 image references have no alt attribute. 1719 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets8 issues
    8 assets larger than 500 KB among 998 fetched assets. 5 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −4.8 points
  • Orphan pages177 issues
    177 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1 points
  • Sitemap coverage29 issues
    4 sitemaps listing 581 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 28 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.2 points
  • Internal link counts500 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 500 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 580 pages have fewer than 200 words. 161 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format814 noted
    814 of 1160 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals161 noted
    161 of 741 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives741 noted
    741 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text96 noted
    96 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure219 noted
    219 of 580 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 161 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length151 noted
    147 images over 100 KB; 4 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies109 noted
    109 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 741 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured data1 noted
    741 of 580 indexable pages carry structured data: WebSite (741), WebPage (741), BreadcrumbList (672), ListItem (672), ImageObject (17). 1 page with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 565 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 741 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions44 noted
    44 of 552 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 2158 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 741 pages; 427 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling216 noted
    216 words an English dictionary does not know, on 116 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2620 sites, median 80%, average 78%

www.tmlawyers.com scores 78%, higher than 41% of the 2620 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0601200%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 5 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 5 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 8 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 15 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 39 sites67%: 39 sites68%: 37 sites69%: 48 sites70%: 48 sites71%: 74 sites72%: 73 sites73%: 78 sites74%: 76 sites75%: 84 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 106 sites78%: 118 sites79%: 106 sites80%: 120 sites81%: 115 sites82%: 119 sites83%: 117 sites84%: 120 sites85%: 98 sites86%: 87 sites87%: 86 sites88%: 70 sites89%: 72 sites90%: 48 sites91%: 56 sites92%: 41 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 16 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites78% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

There are critical issues to address, including broken links and various page meta issues. Focus on improving indexability and fixing redirects will enhance SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 8 internal links point to broken URLs, affecting user experience.

    How: Update or remove the links to the broken URLs listed.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Address Redirects

    Why: 417 redirects may slow down the site. Chained redirects add unnecessary complexity.

    How: Streamline the redirects and fix chained URLs by updating to direct links.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 452 pages have title issues, impacting search visibility.

    How: Review and write unique, relevant title tags for the affected pages.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 568 pages have meta description issues, which can hurt click-through rates.

    How: Write concise and engaging meta descriptions for the affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Resolve Indexability Warnings

    Why: 67 indexable pages have warnings that may affect rankings.

    How: Review the warning issues and ensure proper canonicalization and noindex directives if necessary.

    Checks: indexability

  6. 6

    Reduce Heavy Assets

    Why: 8 assets over 500 KB can slow page loading times.

    How: Optimize images or documents by compressing files or hosting them appropriately.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site lacks essential security headers, exposing it to potential attacks. Key protections, including HSTS, Content Security Policy, and X-Frame-Options, are absent, which could lead to data interception and clickjacking incidents. Recommendations include implementing these headers and reducing server version disclosure to enhance security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 3 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of HSTS allows interception of non-HTTPS requests.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Without CSP, scripts and resources may be loaded from untrusted sources.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of clickjacking protection allows framing on other sites.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, the browser may incorrectly execute files.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Missing Referrer-PolicyLow

    Why it matters: No referrer policy exposes URLs users click to external sites.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  6. 6

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Revealing server version helps attackers target known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Remove or obscure 'X-Powered-By' and limit server information.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  7. 7

    Missing Permissions-PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Lack of policies may allow unnecessary access to browser features.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: interest-cohort=(), geolocation=(self).

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/practice-areas/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/civil-litigation/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/construction-litigation/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/corporate-commercial-arbitration/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/corporate-commercial-litigation/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/indigenous-law/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/insurance/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/mediation-dispute-resolution/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/municipal-law/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/pension-law/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 741 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/practice-areas/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/civil-litigation/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/construction-litigation/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/corporate-commercial-arbitration/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/corporate-commercial-litigation/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/indigenous-law/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/insurance/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/mediation-dispute-resolution/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/municipal-law/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/pension-law/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/practice-areas/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/civil-litigation/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/construction-litigation/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/corporate-commercial-arbitration/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/corporate-commercial-litigation/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/indigenous-law/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/insurance/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/mediation-dispute-resolution/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/municipal-law/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/pension-law/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/practice-areas/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/civil-litigation/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/construction-litigation/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/corporate-commercial-arbitration/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/corporate-commercial-litigation/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/indigenous-law/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/insurance/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/mediation-dispute-resolution/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/municipal-law/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/pension-law/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/practice-areas/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/civil-litigation/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/construction-litigation/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/corporate-commercial-arbitration/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/corporate-commercial-litigation/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/indigenous-law/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/insurance/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/mediation-dispute-resolution/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/municipal-law/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/pension-law/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/practice-areas/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/civil-litigation/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/construction-litigation/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/corporate-commercial-arbitration/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/corporate-commercial-litigation/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/indigenous-law/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/insurance/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/mediation-dispute-resolution/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/municipal-law/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tmlawyers.com/advocacy-litigation-dispute-resolution/pension-law/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: LiteSpeed (2158 responses)
    • x-powered-by: PHP/8.3.36 (32 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn.jsdelivr.net (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (80 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 741 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    81 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.tmlawyers.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.tmlawyers.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.tmlawyers.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.tmlawyers.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.