Scanned sites / www.thegarden509.com / 2026-09-11-2341

www.thegarden509.com scan from 2026-09-11 23:41:40 UTC DR 1

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.thegarden509.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-11-2341

Scanned 2026-09-11 23:41:40 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 00:42:07 UTC

Site: https://www.thegarden509.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

70/ 100Needs work

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 27 pages and 237 assets of www.thegarden509.com, starting from https://www.thegarden509.com/. It scored 70 out of 100, a result that needs work. 10 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (17), meta descriptions (17), thin content (11); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−7.7), meta descriptions (−6.2), thin content (−4). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
27
Assets fetched
237
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

264 of 264 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 28 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags17 issues
    17 of 17 pages have title issues. 5 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.7 points
  • Meta descriptions17 issues
    17 of 17 pages have meta description issues. 5 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.2 points
  • Headings13 issues
    13 of 17 pages have heading issues. 5 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.5 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 5 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 24 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects5 issues
    6 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.9 points
  • Non-200 responses6 noted
    6 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 5 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 17 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 5 pages noindex by design.
    −0.9 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 70 image references have no alt attribute. 25 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets2 issues
    2 assets larger than 500 KB among 237 fetched assets.
    −1.2 points
  • Orphan pages13 issues
    13 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −2.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage12 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 17 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 12 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3.3 points
  • Internal link counts4 noted
    Internal link counts for 22 pages; 4 worth a look.
  • Thin content11 issues
    11 of 17 pages have fewer than 200 words. 5 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format4 noted
    4 of 27 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals7 noted
    7 of 22 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives22 noted
    22 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text5 noted
    5 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure10 noted
    10 of 17 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 5 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length8 noted
    8 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies2 noted
    2 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 22 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 264 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 22 pages; 18 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2328 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.thegarden509.com scores 70%, higher than 18% of the 2328 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 73 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 63 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites70% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The website has several critical SEO issues needing urgent attention, particularly around redirects, title tags, and meta descriptions. Addressing these will enhance search visibility and user experience significantly.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirect Issues

    Why: Redundant redirects can slow down your site's performance.

    How: Remove unnecessary redirects and ensure direct access to URLs.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Response URLs

    Why: Non-200 responses prevent users and search engines from accessing pages.

    How: Identify redirected URLs and make necessary corrections to ensure they return a 200 status.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: All pages lack effective title tags, which are essential for SEO.

    How: Craft concise and keyword-rich title tags (50-60 characters) for each page.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Add Missing Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing meta descriptions hurt click-through rates from search results.

    How: Create engaging meta descriptions (150-160 characters) for each page.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: Proper headings improve content hierarchy and SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has a unique H1 tag, and avoid multiple H1 headings.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Link to Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages are difficult for users and search engines to find.

    How: Add internal links to orphan pages from relevant content across the site.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security issues that need addressing, particularly in response headers and the use of a vulnerable library. Implementing HSTS and frame options can enhance protection against clickjacking and man-in-the-middle attacks. Additionally, upgrading jQuery is crucial to maintain security. Immediate action is recommended.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HSTS HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of HSTS allows potential interception of first requests without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of clickjacking protection could allow embedding of your site in malicious frames.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY or X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Vulnerable jQuery LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery version 1.7.0 has multiple known vulnerabilities; could be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers might incorrectly execute files as scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.thegarden509.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/bloom-location/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/events/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/2022/12/hello-world/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/sample-page/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/order-2/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/shop/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/cart/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/checkout/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/my-account/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    5 of 22 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.thegarden509.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/bloom-location/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/contact-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/events/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/2022/12/hello-world/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/sample-page/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/order-2/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/shop/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/cart/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/checkout/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/my-account/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.thegarden509.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/bloom-location/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/contact-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/events/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/2022/12/hello-world/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/sample-page/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/order-2/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/shop/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/cart/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/checkout/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thegarden509.com/my-account/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.7.0. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.7.0 in https://www.thegarden509.com/wp-content/themes/salient/js/build/third-party/hov…: CVE-2012-6708 (selector XSS), CVE-2015-9251, CVE-2019-11358, CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023; fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 5 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (17 script tags)
    • img1.wsimg.com (17 script tags)
    • www.instagram.com (1 script tag)
    • embed.styledcalendar.com (1 script tag)
    • captcha.wpsecurity.godaddy.com (4 script tags)
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 22 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 5 of 22 pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    25 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.thegarden509.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.thegarden509.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.thegarden509.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.thegarden509.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.