Scanned sites / www.thebestcalgary.com / 2026-09-12-2237

www.thebestcalgary.com scan from 2026-09-12 22:37:09 UTC DR 73

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.thebestcalgary.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-2237

Scanned 2026-09-12 22:37:09 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 23:06:12 UTC. Found on page 2 of brave web search results

Not a full crawl. The scan was concluded early by the site operator with 1854 URLs left unfetched. This is not a full crawl: results cover only what was crawled before it stopped.

Site: https://www.thebestcalgary.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

89/ 100GoodNot a full crawl

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 316 pages and 2 assets of www.thebestcalgary.com, starting from https://www.thebestcalgary.com/. It scored 89 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by sitemap coverage (158), meta descriptions (120), title tags (84); 13 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−3), sitemap coverage (−3), title tags (−2.7). 6 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
316
Assets fetched
2
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 26
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

318 of 2,172 discovered URLs were fetched, 11,814 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget, 1,854 skipped when the crawl was cut short. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 332 link destinations on other sites were checked, 4147 left unchecked.

  • Title tags84 issues
    84 of 316 pages have title issues.
    −2.7 points
  • Meta descriptions120 issues
    120 of 316 pages have meta description issues.
    −3 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 316 pages have heading issues.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites13 issues
    13 destinations answered with an error, 64 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 4147 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −1.6 points
  • Redirects1 noted
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses1 noted
    1 URL did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 316 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt text748 issues
    748 of 4474 image references have no alt attribute. 147 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −1 points
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 2 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage158 issues
    No sitemap found. Tried: https://www.thebestcalgary.com/sitemap.xml (301), https://www.thebestcalgary.com/sitemap_index.xml (skipped). Add one at /sitemap.xml or list it in robots.txt.
    −3 points
  • Internal link counts8 noted
    Internal link counts for 316 pages; 8 worth a look.
  • Thin content2 issues
    2 of 316 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −0.1 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 316 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 316 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives316 noted
    316 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text525 noted
    525 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure88 noted
    88 of 316 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 316 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 10 response headers recorded across 318 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 316 pages; 54 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2333 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.thebestcalgary.com scores 89%, higher than 86% of the 2333 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites89% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site's health is excellent, but there are key issues to address. Prioritize fixing title and meta description issues, missing headings, and adding a sitemap. These changes will significantly enhance SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirect

    Why: Remove the unnecessary redirect to improve crawl efficiency.

    How: Redirect visitors directly to the sitemap or properly create a sitemap at the expected URL.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Add Sitemap

    Why: A sitemap helps search engines crawl your site effectively.

    How: Create a valid sitemap and place it at /sitemap.xml.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Many titles are either too short or too long, impacting click-through rates.

    How: Adjust titles to be between 30-60 characters and ensure relevance.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions are missing on many pages, harming visibility.

    How: Write concise, relevant meta descriptions for all pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Missing H1 Headings

    Why: H1 tags are essential for both SEO and user experience.

    How: Add an H1 tag to the homepage and blog page that summarizes the page content.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Add Alt Text to Images

    Why: Alt text helps with accessibility and can improve image search rankings.

    How: Add descriptive alt attributes to the 748 images lacking them.

    Checks: images-alt

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site lacks important security headers, leaving it vulnerable to attacks like man-in-the-middle and clickjacking. Implementing strict transport security, a content security policy, and clickjacking protections are crucial to enhance security for users.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users accessing the site via HTTP may be exposed to interception.

    Fix: Add the header `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains` to all responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: The absence of CSP allows potentially malicious content to be loaded from any source.

    Fix: Implement a CSP header, for instance, `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';` to restrict resource loading.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, the site is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header `X-Frame-Options: DENY` to prevent framing.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers might execute files as scripts, posing a security risk.

    Fix: Include the header `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff` in responses to mitigate this risk.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    External Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Running scripts from external domains without SRI makes the site vulnerable if those domains are compromised.

    Fix: Either use Subresource Integrity for these scripts or implement a suitable Content Security Policy.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/news-and-events/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/entertainment/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/entertainment/activities/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/entertainment/attractions/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/entertainment/fitness/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/money/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/money/investments/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/money/loans/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/money/other-financial-products/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/services/construction/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 316 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/news-and-events/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/entertainment/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/entertainment/activities/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/entertainment/attractions/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/entertainment/fitness/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/money/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/money/investments/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/money/loans/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/money/other-financial-products/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/services/construction/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/news-and-events/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/entertainment/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/entertainment/activities/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/entertainment/attractions/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/entertainment/fitness/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/money/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/money/investments/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/money/loans/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/money/other-financial-products/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/services/construction/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/news-and-events/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/entertainment/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/entertainment/activities/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/entertainment/attractions/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/entertainment/fitness/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/money/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/money/investments/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/money/loans/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/money/other-financial-products/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.thebestcalgary.com/services/construction/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (35 script tags)
    • www.instagram.com (9 script tags)
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 316 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    78 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.thebestcalgary.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.thebestcalgary.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.thebestcalgary.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.thebestcalgary.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.