Scanned sites / www.tendingtoes.com / 2026-11-07-2254

www.tendingtoes.com scan from 2026-11-07 22:54:03 UTC DR 5

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.tendingtoes.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-07-2254

Scanned 2026-11-07 22:54:03 UTC, finished 2026-11-08 00:23:27 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.tendingtoes.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

70/ 100Needs work

On November 7, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 73 pages and 217 assets of www.tendingtoes.com, starting from https://www.tendingtoes.com/. It scored 70 out of 100, a result that needs work. 8 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (65), meta descriptions (71), sitemap coverage (55); 14 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−9), meta descriptions (−7.9), sitemap coverage (−4.6). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Low2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
73
Assets fetched
217
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

290 of 293 discovered URLs were fetched, 3 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 4 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags65 issues
    65 of 72 pages have title issues.
    −9 points
  • Meta descriptions71 issues
    71 of 72 pages have meta description issues.
    −7.9 points
  • Headings54 issues
    54 of 72 pages have heading issues.
    −4.5 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites72 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 4 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 issue
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses2 noted
    2 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 72 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 156 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 217 fetched assets.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pages55 issues
    55 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −3.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage55 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 72 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 55 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −4.6 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 72 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 72 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format53 noted
    53 of 73 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 72 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directivesOK
    No page carries a robots directive; all 72 pages are open to search engines.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structure63 noted
    63 of 72 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length1 noted
    0 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 72 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured data2 noted
    72 of 72 indexable pages carry structured data: LocalBusiness (72). 2 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 13 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404s1 noted
    1 page answer 200 but say they are not there.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions8 noted
    8 of 17 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 17 response headers recorded across 290 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 72 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling4 noted
    4 words an English dictionary does not know, on 2 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2877 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.tendingtoes.com scores 70%, higher than 16% of the 2877 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0761510%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 44 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 53 sites70%: 47 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 82 sites74%: 83 sites75%: 86 sites76%: 94 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 120 sites84%: 131 sites85%: 105 sites86%: 94 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 16 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 151 sites70% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Several critical SEO issues need addressing, particularly with title tags, meta descriptions, headings, and orphan pages. Focus on high-impact changes first.

  1. 1

    Fix Title Tag Issues

    Why: 65 pages have title issues, impacting search ranking.

    How: Create unique titles for 45 pages currently sharing 'Happy Customer'. If duplicates exist, canonicalize them.

    Checks: titles

  2. 2

    Address Meta Description Problems

    Why: 71 pages lack proper meta descriptions, which affect click-through rates.

    How: Write unique meta descriptions for these pages, ensuring keywords are included.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Add Missing Headings

    Why: 54 pages are missing H1 tags, crucial for SEO structure.

    How: Implement a clear H1 heading on each of these pages.

    Checks: headings

  4. 4

    Resolve Orphan Page Issues

    Why: 55 pages lack internal links, leading to poor indexing.

    How: Add internal links to these pages from related content.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  5. 5

    Implement Redirect Fixes

    Why: Redirects can slow down page speed and affect user experience.

    How: Update or remove unnecessary redirects from your site.

    Checks: redirects

  6. 6

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: One asset exceeds 500 KB, which can slow load times.

    How: Consider shrinking or optimizing large assets, particularly scripts and stylesheets.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several vulnerabilities regarding server version disclosure and the use of third-party scripts without proper security measures. Additionally, sensitive paths are exposed in the robots.txt file, which could aid potential attackers. Immediate action is recommended to mitigate these risks.

  • 0 high
  • 0 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Revealing exact server and framework versions can help attackers exploit known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Remove the 'Server' header or set it to a generic value. Also, consider removing the 'X-Powered-By' header.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  2. 2

    Third-party Scripts Without SRILow

    Why it matters: Using scripts from cdn.jsdelivr.net without Subresource Integrity increases the risk of script compromise.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity for the external scripts or set a Content-Security-Policy that restricts which scripts can run.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file lists private paths that should be protected, providing attackers with a map of private areas.

    Fix: Implement proper access controls to the listed paths (/admin/, /includes/, /config/, /backup/, /wp-admin/, /wp-includes/) instead of relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: Apache (290 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Rocket/3.23.5.1 (1 response)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn.jsdelivr.net (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 6 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /admin/
    • Disallow: /includes/
    • Disallow: /config/
    • Disallow: /backup/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-includes/
12 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 72 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 72 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 72 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 72 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 72 HTML pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 72 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.tendingtoes.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.tendingtoes.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.tendingtoes.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.tendingtoes.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.