Scanned sites / www.tendingtoes.com / 2026-10-30-2223

www.tendingtoes.com scan from 2026-10-30 22:23:00 UTC DR 7

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.tendingtoes.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-10-30-2223

Scanned 2026-10-30 22:23:00 UTC, finished 2026-10-30 23:13:16 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.tendingtoes.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

80/ 100Good

On October 30, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 18 pages and 161 assets of www.tendingtoes.com, starting from https://www.tendingtoes.com/. It scored 80 out of 100, a good result. 5 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (16), sitemap coverage (17), title tags (10); 20 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.5), sitemap coverage (−6), title tags (−5.9). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Low2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
18
Assets fetched
161
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
5 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

179 of 182 discovered URLs were fetched, 3 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 4 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags10 issues
    10 of 17 pages have title issues.
    −5.9 points
  • Meta descriptions16 issues
    16 of 17 pages have meta description issues.
    −7.5 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 17 pages have heading issues.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites17 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 4 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 issue
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses6 noted
    6 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 17 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 48 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 161 fetched assets.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage17 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 17 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −6 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 17 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 17 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 18 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 17 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directivesOK
    No page carries a robots directive; all 17 pages are open to search engines.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structure9 noted
    9 of 17 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length1 noted
    0 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 17 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured data2 noted
    17 of 17 indexable pages carry structured data: LocalBusiness (17). 2 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 13 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 17 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions8 noted
    8 of 17 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 17 response headers recorded across 179 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 17 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling3 noted
    3 words an English dictionary does not know, on 1 page. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2347 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.tendingtoes.com scores 80%, higher than 50% of the 2347 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 91 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 106 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 104 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 88 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 66 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 17 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites80% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The site has several SEO issues, including missing meta descriptions, title tag problems, and an incomplete sitemap. Addressing these will significantly improve SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Title Tags

    Why: 10 titles need adjustments, improving relevance and search impressions.

    How: Update titles for affected pages, ensuring they are unique and relevant to page content.

    Evidence: 3 pages share the title "Medical Pedicures | Pedicures | Boise, Idaho | 208-853-TOES", which usually means one template writes it for all of them.

    3 pages affected

    Depends on: If these pages really are the same content, the duplicate title is a symptom: canonicalise them to one URL instead.

    Checks: titles

  2. 2

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: 16 pages lack proper meta descriptions, affecting click-through rates.

    How: Create and add unique meta descriptions on pages that are missing or too similar.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Update Sitemap

    Why: 1 sitemap has no listed URLs, leading to poor discoverability.

    How: Ensure all crawled pages are included in the sitemap and submit it to search engines.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  4. 4

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: 1 asset exceeds 500 KB, which can slow down the site.

    How: Compress or remove unnecessary heavy assets, improving load times.

    Evidence: 519 KB of script, loaded by 17 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    17 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  5. 5

    Reduce Redirects

    Why: 2 URLs redirect, which can lead to slower page loads and SEO issues.

    How: Remove unnecessary redirects or update links to point directly to final URLs.

    Checks: redirects

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has some areas needing attention for improved security, including exposing server version information and running third-party scripts without sufficient integrity checks. Additionally, sensitive paths are listed in the robots.txt file that could guide attackers. Address these findings urgently to reduce potential risks.

  • 0 high
  • 0 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Exposing server version allows attackers to look up known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Remove or modify 'Server' and 'X-Powered-By' headers. Consider using 'Server: Apache' and not revealing the version number.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  2. 2

    Third-Party Scripts Without Integrity ChecksLow

    Why it matters: Lack of Subresource Integrity increases risk if third-party scripts are compromised.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity for scripts from cdn.jsdelivr.net or apply a restrictive Content-Security-Policy.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Listing sensitive paths publicly can help malicious users target those sections.

    Fix: Restrict access to /admin/, /includes/, /config/, /backup/, /wp-admin/, and /wp-includes/ with proper access controls.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: Apache (179 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Rocket/3.23.5.1 (1 response)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn.jsdelivr.net (17 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 6 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /admin/
    • Disallow: /includes/
    • Disallow: /config/
    • Disallow: /backup/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-includes/
11 checks passed, 2 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 17 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 17 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 17 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 17 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 17 HTML pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 17 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.tendingtoes.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.tendingtoes.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.tendingtoes.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.tendingtoes.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.