Scanned sites / www.tendingtoes.com / 2026-10-19-0423
www.tendingtoes.com scan from 2026-10-19 04:23:00 UTC DR 7
A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.tendingtoes.com.
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Scan 2026-10-19-0423
Scanned 2026-10-19 04:23:00 UTC, finished 2026-10-19 05:16:10 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass
Site: https://www.tendingtoes.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On October 19, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 23 pages and 200 assets of www.tendingtoes.com, starting from https://www.tendingtoes.com/. It scored 79 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (21), title tags (13), heavy assets (3); 12 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.6), title tags (−5.9), heavy assets (−1.8). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium4 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 23
- Assets fetched
- 200
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 10 of 33
223 of 226 discovered URLs were fetched, 3 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 13 link destinations on other sites were checked.
- Title tags13 issues13 of 22 pages have title issues.−5.9 points
- Meta descriptions21 issues21 of 22 pages have meta description issues.−7.6 points
- Headings6 issues6 of 22 pages have heading issues.−1.6 points
- Broken linksOK0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
- Links to other sites21 noted0 destinations answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 13 destinations checked.
- Redirects1 issue1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.−0.2 points
- Non-200 responses1 noted1 URL did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability2 issues2 of 22 indexable pages have indexability warnings.−0.9 points
- Image alt text7 issues7 of 122 image references have no alt attribute. 15 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.−0.3 points
- Heavy assets3 issues3 assets larger than 500 KB among 200 fetched assets.−1.8 points
- Orphan pages2 issues2 pages have no internal links pointing at them.−0.4 points
- Sitemap coverage6 issues5 sitemaps listing 20 URLs: 2 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 4 reachable only via the sitemap.−1.6 points
- Internal link counts1 notedInternal link counts for 22 pages; 1 worth a look.
- Thin content1 issue1 of 22 pages have fewer than 200 words.−0.4 points
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL formatOKAll 23 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
- Canonicals2 noted2 of 22 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directivesOKNo page carries a robots directive; all 22 pages are open to search engines.
- Anchor textOKEvery internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
- Title and heading structure17 noted17 of 22 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
- Image weight and alt length14 noted14 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomalies1 noted1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
- HTML and head validation1 noted1 of 22 pages have HTML problems: 0 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
- hreflangOKNo page declares hreflang.
- Structured dataOKNo page carries structured data (22 indexable pages checked).
- Near duplicatesOKNo near duplicates among 15 pages with enough text to compare.
- Soft 404s1 noted1 page answer 200 but say they are not there.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positions10 noted10 of 20 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
- PaginationOKNo page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
- Headers and cookiesOK0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 223 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 22 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed InsightsNot checkedNot checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
- Spelling4 noted4 words an English dictionary does not know, on 2 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
2284 sites, median 79%, average 78%
www.tendingtoes.com scores 79%, higher than 47% of the 2284 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsYour website has several areas needing improvement, particularly related to page titles, meta descriptions, and indexability. Prioritizing these issues will significantly enhance SEO performance.
- 1
Fix Meta Descriptions
Why: 21 pages are missing or have issues with meta descriptions, impacting click-through rates.
How: Write concise meta descriptions for all affected pages to accurately reflect their content.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 2
Address Title Issues
Why: 13 pages have title issues, which might affect their search visibility.
How: Create or revise titles for these pages to be unique and contextually relevant.
Checks: titles
- 3
Resolve Indexability Warnings
Why: 2 indexable pages have warnings, potentially limiting their visibility in search results.
How: Add the necessary canonical tags and viewport meta to the affected pages.
Checks: indexability
- 4
Improve Heading Structure
Why: 6 pages with multiple H1 tags can confuse search engines about the main topic.
How: Ensure each page has one clear H1 tag and supporting subheadings.
Checks: headings
- 5
Shrink Heavy Assets
Why: 3 heavy assets can slow down your site, affecting user experience.
How: Optimize the specified assets by compressing images and removing unnecessary files.
Checks: heavy-assets
- 6
Include Orphan Pages in Internal Links
Why: 2 orphan pages currently lack internal links, leading to missed traffic.
How: Add internal links from relevant pages to these orphan pages to enhance discoverability.
Checks: orphan-pages
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThe site lacks several important security headers, which can expose it to various risks, such as interception and clickjacking. Additionally, a Google API key is publicly accessible, requiring confidentiality measures. Addressing these issues will enhance the site's security significantly.
- 0 high
- 4 medium
- 2 low
- 1 info
- 1
Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium
Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted when accessing the site using HTTP.
Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security
- 2
No Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium
Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows malicious scripts to be executed from untrusted sources.
Fix: Implement a CSP header, e.g., Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 3
No X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium
Why it matters: The absence of this header can lead to clickjacking attacks.
Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 4
Exposed Google API KeyMedium
Why it matters: The API key could be abused if proper access restrictions are not set.
Fix: Restrict the key by HTTP referrer in the Google Cloud console.
Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code
- 5
Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow
Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may misinterpret file types, leading to security risks.
Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
Evidence: MIME sniffing protection
- 6
No Referrer-Policy HeaderLow
Why it matters: Without a referrer policy, sensitive page URLs may be shared with external sites.
Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer
Evidence: Referrer policy
- 7
Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo
Why it matters: This header controls browser features, limiting capabilities of potential injected scripts.
Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self), microphone=()
Evidence: Permissions policy
What the checks found
- FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no strict-transport-security
- FoundContent Security PolicyMedium
None of the 22 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no content-security-policy
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow
No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no x-content-type-options
- FoundReferrer policyLow
No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no referrer-policy
- FoundPermissions policyInfo
No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no permissions-policy
- FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium
1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.
- Google API key AIzaSy…U4 (39 chars) in https://www.tendingtoes.com/terms-of-use/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- cdn.jsdelivr.net (21 script tags)
- maps.googleapis.com (1 script tag)
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 6 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /admin/
- Disallow: /includes/
- Disallow: /config/
- Disallow: /backup/
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /wp-includes/
6 checks passed, 1 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 22 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKSoftware version disclosure
The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries
1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- Not applicableCookie flags
The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near www.tendingtoes.com
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- amanblaze.inDR 080/100 · rank 1015 · 22 pages
- trends.google.comDR 10079/100 · rank 1122 · 5 pages
- www.eitherorpdx.comDR 1879/100 · rank 1122 · 13 pages
- www.strategiccriminaldefence.comDR 2979/100 · rank 1122 · 571 pages
- www.aestheticdentalstudio.caDR 979/100 · rank 1122 · 234 pages
- bing.comDR 9379/100 · rank 1122 · 1,643 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.tendingtoes.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own www.tendingtoes.com?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.tendingtoes.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.