Scanned sites / www.tendingtoes.com / 2026-10-18-2042

www.tendingtoes.com scan from 2026-10-18 20:42:38 UTC DR 7

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-10-18-2042

Scanned 2026-10-18 20:42:38 UTC, finished 2026-10-18 21:35:23 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.tendingtoes.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

79/ 100Good

On October 18, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 23 pages and 200 assets of www.tendingtoes.com, starting from https://www.tendingtoes.com/. It scored 79 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (21), title tags (13), heavy assets (3); 12 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.6), title tags (−5.9), heavy assets (−1.8). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium, 3 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
23
Assets fetched
200
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

223 of 226 discovered URLs were fetched, 3 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 13 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags13 issues
    13 of 22 pages have title issues.
    −5.9 points
  • Meta descriptions21 issues
    21 of 22 pages have meta description issues.
    −7.6 points
  • Headings6 issues
    6 of 22 pages have heading issues.
    −1.6 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites21 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 13 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 issue
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses1 noted
    1 URL did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 22 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.9 points
  • Image alt text7 issues
    7 of 122 image references have no alt attribute. 15 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.3 points
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 200 fetched assets.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pages2 issues
    2 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage6 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 20 URLs: 2 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 4 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.6 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 22 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 22 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −0.4 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 23 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 22 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directivesOK
    No page carries a robots directive; all 22 pages are open to search engines.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structure17 noted
    17 of 22 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length14 noted
    14 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validation1 noted
    1 of 22 pages have HTML problems: 0 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    No page carries structured data (22 indexable pages checked).
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 15 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404s1 noted
    1 page answer 200 but say they are not there.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions10 noted
    10 of 20 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 223 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 22 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling4 noted
    4 words an English dictionary does not know, on 2 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2284 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.tendingtoes.com scores 79%, higher than 47% of the 2284 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 7 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 45 sites70%: 41 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 65 sites74%: 70 sites75%: 71 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 106 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 95 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 66 sites87%: 71 sites88%: 62 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 33 sites93%: 21 sites94%: 14 sites95%: 10 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 9 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 0 sites100%: 70 sites79% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your website has several SEO issues that need addressing, particularly with title tags, meta descriptions, and headings. Prioritizing these fixes will significantly improve your site’s SEO health.

  1. 1

    Fix Title Tag Issues

    Why: 13 pages have title problems, affecting SEO rankings.

    How: Add or improve titles to meet best practices (50-60 characters). Focus on including relevant keywords.

    Checks: titles

  2. 2

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 21 pages lack or have short meta descriptions, impacting click-through rates.

    How: Craft unique meta descriptions for each page, ensuring they are engaging and around 155 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Resolve Heading Issues

    Why: 6 pages have multiple H1 tags, confusing search engines.

    How: Review the headings on these pages and ensure each has a single H1 tag, with appropriate H2/H3 tags for structure.

    Checks: headings

  4. 4

    Address Redirects

    Why: There’s a redirect impacting the user flow.

    How: Update links to directly point to https://www.tendingtoes.com/contact/ to eliminate the redirect.

    Checks: redirects

  5. 5

    Fix Indexability Warnings

    Why: 2 pages have indexability warnings that could affect their search visibility.

    How: Add canonical tags, viewport meta tags, and lang attributes where missing.

    Checks: indexability

  6. 6

    Shrink Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets slow down your site, affecting user experience.

    How: Compress large images and stylesheets to improve load time.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several important security improvements that need addressing. Key areas include missing security headers that protect against man-in-the-middle attacks, clickjacking, and script vulnerabilities. Additionally, sensitive information such as an API key is exposed. Implementing the recommended fixes will enhance the security posture of your site.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 3 low
  • 2 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users may be exposed to interception when not using HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows unregulated loading of scripts and resources, increasing XSS risk.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of this protection allows clickjacking attacks by embedding content in an iframe.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: Exposed API key can be misused, leading to unauthorized access or account restrictions.

    Fix: Restrict the API key in the Google Cloud Console based on HTTP referrers.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: This header prevents browsers from interpreting files as a different MIME type, protecting against certain attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Missing Referrer Policy HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without a referrer policy, sensitive URL information can be exposed to third-party sites.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  7. 7

    Third-party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from other domains could be compromised and affect your site's security.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy that specifies allowed sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  8. 8

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: A permissions policy restricts access to browser features for injected scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self), microphone=(), camera=()

    Evidence: Permissions policy

  9. 9

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Publicly listed paths may reveal sensitive areas that should not be easily discoverable.

    Fix: Implement actual access controls instead of relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 22 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…U4 (39 chars) in https://www.tendingtoes.com/terms-of-use/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn.jsdelivr.net (21 script tags)
    • maps.googleapis.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 6 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /admin/
    • Disallow: /includes/
    • Disallow: /config/
    • Disallow: /backup/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-includes/
6 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 22 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.tendingtoes.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.tendingtoes.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.tendingtoes.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.tendingtoes.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.