Scanned sites / www.tendingtoes.com / 2026-10-09-1442

www.tendingtoes.com scan from 10/9/2026, 2:42:22 PM DR 7

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.tendingtoes.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-10-09-1442

Scanned 10/9/2026, 2:42:22 PM, finished 10/9/2026, 2:45:48 PM. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.tendingtoes.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

79/ 100Good

On October 9, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 23 pages and 190 assets of www.tendingtoes.com, starting from https://www.tendingtoes.com/. It scored 79 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 23 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (21), title tags (13), heavy assets (3); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.6), title tags (−5.9), heavy assets (−1.8). 6 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium, 3 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
23
Assets fetched
190
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 23
CoverageComplete crawl

213 of 216 discovered URLs were fetched, 3 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 13 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags13 issues
    13 of 22 pages have title issues.
    −5.9 points
  • Meta descriptions21 issues
    21 of 22 pages have meta description issues.
    −7.6 points
  • Headings6 issues
    6 of 22 pages have heading issues.
    −1.6 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites21 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 13 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 issue
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses1 noted
    1 URL did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 22 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.9 points
  • Image alt text7 issues
    7 of 122 image references have no alt attribute. 15 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.3 points
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 190 fetched assets.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pages2 issues
    2 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage6 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 20 URLs: 2 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 4 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.6 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 22 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 22 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −0.4 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 23 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 22 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directivesOK
    No page carries a robots directive; all 22 pages are open to search engines.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structure17 noted
    17 of 22 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length14 noted
    14 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2186 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.tendingtoes.com scores 79%, higher than 48% of the 2186 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0551100%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 1 site28%: 0 sites29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 2 sites41%: 2 sites42%: 0 sites43%: 2 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 6 sites47%: 4 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 5 sites50%: 4 sites51%: 4 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 8 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 6 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 24 sites64%: 18 sites65%: 37 sites66%: 29 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 33 sites69%: 39 sites70%: 42 sites71%: 66 sites72%: 75 sites73%: 66 sites74%: 60 sites75%: 75 sites76%: 80 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 100 sites79%: 87 sites80%: 103 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 110 sites83%: 90 sites84%: 99 sites85%: 71 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 64 sites88%: 60 sites89%: 57 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 40 sites92%: 27 sites93%: 23 sites94%: 12 sites95%: 7 sites96%: 5 sites97%: 10 sites98%: 3 sites99%: 0 sites100%: 64 sites79% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site has a good health score, but there are some key SEO issues. Focus on fixing meta descriptions, titles, and internal linking to improve indexability and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Meta Descriptions

    Why: 21 of 22 pages have missing or ineffective meta descriptions, impacting click-through rates.

    How: Write concise, engaging meta descriptions for all affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  2. 2

    Resolve Title Issues

    Why: 13 of 22 pages have title issues. Titles help with search visibility.

    How: Create or update titles for pages missing them or with short titles.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Update Headings Structure

    Why: 6 pages with multiple H1 elements can confuse search engines.

    How: Edit pages to ensure each has a single H1 and use H2 for subsections.

    Checks: headings

  4. 4

    Improve Indexability

    Why: 2 pages flagged with indexability warnings need updates to perform better in search.

    How: Add a canonical tag, viewport meta, and language attribute where missing.

    Checks: indexability

  5. 5

    Add Internal Links

    Why: 2 orphan pages are not easily discoverable, hurting traffic potential.

    How: Link to these pages from other relevant pages or the main navigation.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Optimize Sitemap Coverage

    Why: 2 pages are not listed in the sitemap, potentially missing out on search traffic.

    How: Add these pages to your XML sitemap and resubmit to search engines.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

This review highlights important security issues on your website that need addressing to enhance protection against potential attacks. Key areas include missing security headers, the exposure of sensitive information, and usage of third-party scripts without adequate controls.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 3 low
  • 2 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks if they access the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: A lack of CSP allows scripts to load from anywhere, increasing the risk of cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.

    Fix: Add a CSP header, e.g., Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, your site can be subject to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Google API Key ExposureMedium

    Why it matters: The API key is publicly accessible, increasing the risk of misuse.

    Fix: Restrict API key in the Google Cloud console by HTTP referrer and avoid embedding it in public code.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Not having this option can lead to MIME type sniffing, which may allow content to be executed as a script.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Missing Referrer-Policy HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Absence of this policy can expose sensitive URLs when users navigate away from your site.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  7. 7

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Using third-party scripts without SRI means they can be altered, potentially causing security vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Use Subresource Integrity for scripts from external sources or implement a restrictive Content-Security-Policy.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  8. 8

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: Lack of this header may leave unnecessary features available that could be exploited by attackers.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self), microphone=(), camera=().

    Evidence: Permissions policy

  9. 9

    Sensitive Paths Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The public exposure of private path names poses an informational risk, revealing potential targets.

    Fix: Implement proper access controls instead of relying on robots.txt to protect sensitive paths.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 22 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…U4 (39 chars) in https://www.tendingtoes.com/terms-of-use/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn.jsdelivr.net (21 script tags)
    • maps.googleapis.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 6 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /admin/
    • Disallow: /includes/
    • Disallow: /config/
    • Disallow: /backup/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-includes/
6 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 22 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.tendingtoes.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.tendingtoes.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.tendingtoes.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.tendingtoes.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.
www.tendingtoes.com scan 2026-10-09-1442 | DIY SEO Hub