Scanned sites / www.tendingtoes.com / 2026-10-05-0203

www.tendingtoes.com scan from 10/5/2026, 2:03:23 AM

Scan 2026-10-05-0203

Scanned 10/5/2026, 2:03:23 AM, finished 10/5/2026, 2:08:37 AM. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.tendingtoes.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

79/ 100Good

On October 5, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 23 pages and 193 assets of www.tendingtoes.com, starting from https://www.tendingtoes.com/. It scored 79 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 22 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (21), title tags (13), heavy assets (3); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.6), title tags (−5.9), heavy assets (−1.8). 5 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 1 check was not run because the crawl fetched nothing for it. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium, 3 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
23
Assets fetched
193
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 22
CoverageComplete crawl

216 of 219 discovered URLs were fetched, 3 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 13 link destinations on other sites have not been checked.

  • Title tags13 issues
    13 of 22 pages have title issues.
    −5.9 points
  • Meta descriptions21 issues
    21 of 22 pages have meta description issues.
    −7.6 points
  • Headings6 issues
    6 of 22 pages have heading issues.
    −1.6 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sitesNot checked
    Not checked: the crawl fetched nothing this check can look at.
  • Redirects1 issue
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses1 noted
    1 URL did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 22 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.9 points
  • Image alt text7 issues
    7 of 122 image references have no alt attribute. 15 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.3 points
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 193 fetched assets.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pages2 issues
    2 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage6 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 20 URLs: 2 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 4 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.6 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 22 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 22 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −0.4 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 23 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 22 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directivesOK
    No page carries a robots directive; all 22 pages are open to search engines.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structure17 noted
    17 of 22 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length14 noted
    14 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2072 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.tendingtoes.com scores 79%, higher than 47% of the 2072 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0521040%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 1 site28%: 0 sites29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 1 site36%: 2 sites37%: 2 sites38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 2 sites41%: 1 site42%: 0 sites43%: 0 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 4 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 3 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 9 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 7 sites55%: 7 sites56%: 5 sites57%: 11 sites58%: 15 sites59%: 7 sites60%: 12 sites61%: 9 sites62%: 18 sites63%: 20 sites64%: 17 sites65%: 36 sites66%: 27 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 33 sites70%: 35 sites71%: 62 sites72%: 68 sites73%: 56 sites74%: 60 sites75%: 79 sites76%: 77 sites77%: 87 sites78%: 93 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 97 sites81%: 99 sites82%: 104 sites83%: 89 sites84%: 91 sites85%: 69 sites86%: 68 sites87%: 64 sites88%: 68 sites89%: 48 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 42 sites92%: 23 sites93%: 19 sites94%: 15 sites95%: 7 sites96%: 4 sites97%: 10 sites98%: 2 sites99%: 1 site100%: 57 sites79% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site has several areas needing improvement, primarily in titles, meta descriptions, and indexability. Addressing these will enhance visibility and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Title Tags

    Why: 13 pages have title issues impacting SEO and user clarity.

    How: Create or improve titles for these pages to be more descriptive and engaging.

    Evidence: One page has no title at all.

    1 page affected

    Checks: titles

  2. 2

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 21 pages lack or have ineffective meta descriptions, affecting click-through rates.

    How: Write concise and compelling meta descriptions for all affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: A page redirects, which may create confusion for users and affect SEO.

    How: Directly link to the final URL to avoid unnecessary redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  4. 4

    Address Indexability Issues

    Why: 2 pages have warnings which may hinder indexing.

    How: Add canonical tags and viewport meta where missing to optimize for search engines.

    Evidence: One page flagged: No canonical, No viewport meta, No lang attribute.

    1 page affected

    Checks: indexability

  5. 5

    Limit Heavy Assets

    Why: Reducing asset sizes improves load times and user experience.

    How: Shrink or optimize the identified heavy assets to under 500 KB.

    Evidence: 121 KB of script, loaded by 21 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    21 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site lacks essential security headers, making it vulnerable to various attacks, including interception and clickjacking. Additionally, a Google API key is exposed in the page code, requiring immediate attention. Implementing recommended headers and safeguarding the API key will enhance overall security.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 3 low
  • 2 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, connections can be intercepted if users type the address without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: No CSP means unrestricted loading of scripts and styles, increasing vulnerability to attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, pages can be embedded in frames on malicious sites, risking clickjacking.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: The API key is visible to all visitors, risking misuse if not restricted properly.

    Fix: Restrict the API key by HTTP referrer in the Google Cloud console.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret files, posing a script execution risk.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Without a policy, sensitive URL information can be leaked to external sites.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  7. 7

    Third-party Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Without SRI, the site is vulnerable to attacks if third-party scripts are compromised.

    Fix: Implement SRI where possible or restrict third-party sources in a CSP.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  8. 8

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Without this header, browser features may be exploited if malicious scripts are injected.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(none), microphone=(none), camera=(none).

    Evidence: Permissions policy

  9. 9

    Sensitive Paths Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file reveals potentially sensitive paths that may be targeted by attackers.

    Fix: Consider restricting access to these paths with proper authentication and authorization.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 22 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…U4 (39 chars) in https://www.tendingtoes.com/terms-of-use/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn.jsdelivr.net (21 script tags)
    • maps.googleapis.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 6 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /admin/
    • Disallow: /includes/
    • Disallow: /config/
    • Disallow: /backup/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-includes/
6 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 22 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.tendingtoes.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.tendingtoes.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.tendingtoes.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.tendingtoes.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.
www.tendingtoes.com scan 2026-10-05-0203 | DIY SEO Hub