Scanned sites / www.tendingtoes.com / 2026-09-30-1001

www.tendingtoes.com scan from 9/30/2026, 10:01:24 AM

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.tendingtoes.com.

Scan 2026-09-30-1001

Scanned 9/30/2026, 10:01:24 AM, finished 9/30/2026, 10:05:46 AM. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.tendingtoes.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

79/ 100Good

On September 30, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 23 pages and 211 assets of www.tendingtoes.com, starting from https://www.tendingtoes.com/. It scored 79 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 16 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (21), title tags (13), heavy assets (3); 3 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.6), title tags (−5.9), heavy assets (−1.8). 2 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
23
Assets fetched
211
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 16
CoverageComplete crawl

234 of 237 discovered URLs were fetched, 3 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 16 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags13 issues
    13 of 22 pages have title issues.
    −5.9 points
  • Meta descriptions21 issues
    21 of 22 pages have meta description issues.
    −7.6 points
  • Headings6 issues
    6 of 22 pages have heading issues.
    −1.6 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, of 16 destinations checked.
    −0.8 points
  • Redirects1 issue
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses1 noted
    1 URL did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 22 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.9 points
  • Image alt text7 issues
    7 of 122 image references have no alt attribute. 15 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.3 points
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 211 fetched assets.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pages2 issues
    2 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage6 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 20 URLs: 2 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 4 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.6 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 22 pages.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 22 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −0.4 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

1381 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.tendingtoes.com scores 79%, higher than 43% of the 1381 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

039780%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 1 site36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 1 site39%: 0 sites40%: 1 site41%: 0 sites42%: 0 sites43%: 1 site44%: 0 sites45%: 3 sites46%: 2 sites47%: 2 sites48%: 2 sites49%: 3 sites50%: 4 sites51%: 4 sites52%: 6 sites53%: 5 sites54%: 6 sites55%: 4 sites56%: 3 sites57%: 5 sites58%: 10 sites59%: 5 sites60%: 8 sites61%: 10 sites62%: 14 sites63%: 13 sites64%: 8 sites65%: 14 sites66%: 14 sites67%: 26 sites68%: 24 sites69%: 14 sites70%: 34 sites71%: 30 sites72%: 39 sites73%: 33 sites74%: 41 sites75%: 43 sites76%: 51 sites77%: 45 sites78%: 63 sites79%: 50 sites80%: 66 sites81%: 78 sites82%: 69 sites83%: 63 sites84%: 61 sites85%: 44 sites86%: 49 sites87%: 48 sites88%: 50 sites89%: 37 sites90%: 29 sites91%: 33 sites92%: 19 sites93%: 8 sites94%: 10 sites95%: 6 sites96%: 7 sites97%: 4 sites98%: 1 site99%: 2 sites100%: 51 sites79% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your website has several SEO issues that need addressing, particularly with titles, meta descriptions, and headings. Focus on these to enhance visibility and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Title Tag Issues

    Why: 13 pages have title problems, affecting SEO rankings and visibility.

    How: Add descriptive titles to the affected pages. Consider using keywords and keep each title under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  2. 2

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 21 pages lack strong meta descriptions, crucial for CTR in search results.

    How: Create engaging meta descriptions for all affected pages, keeping them under 160 characters and relevant to the page content.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Correct Heading Structure

    Why: 6 pages have multiple H1s, which confuses search engines and users.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 tag, with other headings (H2, H3) organized hierarchically beneath it.

    Checks: headings

  4. 4

    Address Indexability Warnings

    Why: 2 indexable pages have issues that could hinder search engine crawling.

    How: Add canonical tags and viewport meta, and set a lang attribute to improve indexing on the affected pages.

    Checks: indexability

  5. 5

    Add Internal Links for Orphan Pages

    Why: 2 pages have no internal links, limiting their discoverability by users and search engines.

    How: Link to these orphan pages from relevant content within your site to enhance visibility and crawlability.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Optimize Sitemap Coverage

    Why: 2 pages are missing from your sitemap, potentially reducing their visibility.

    How: Update your sitemap to include all crawled and indexable pages, ensuring complete coverage.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several important security issues that need to be addressed. Key areas of concern include the lack of critical HTTP headers such as HSTS and Content Security Policy, exposing the site to potential interception and script injection. Additionally, a Google API key is publicly accessible, which could lead to misuse. These findings should be prioritized for immediate remediation.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, initial connections can be intercepted.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows scripts to load from any source.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, the site is vulnerable to clickjacking.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: API key may be misused since it is publicly accessible.

    Fix: Restrict this key by HTTP referrer in Google Cloud console.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may misinterpret files.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: No policy set, exposing full URLs to external sites.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  7. 7

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Lack of control over certain browser features increases security risks.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: camera=(), microphone=().

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 22 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/about/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/staff/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/virtual-tour/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/medical-pedicures/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/toenail-brace-system/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/manicures/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/traveling-services/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/pricing/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/faqs/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.tendingtoes.com/gallery/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…U4 (39 chars) in https://www.tendingtoes.com/terms-of-use/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn.jsdelivr.net (21 script tags)
    • maps.googleapis.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 6 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /admin/
    • Disallow: /includes/
    • Disallow: /config/
    • Disallow: /backup/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-includes/
6 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 22 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.tendingtoes.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.tendingtoes.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.tendingtoes.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.tendingtoes.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.
www.tendingtoes.com scan 2026-09-30-1001 | DIY SEO Hub