Scanned sites / www.tanyasdanceco.com / 2026-09-10-1401

www.tanyasdanceco.com scan from 2026-09-10 14:01:09 UTC DR 0

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.tanyasdanceco.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-10-1401

Scanned 2026-09-10 14:01:09 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 18:35:48 UTC

Site: https://www.tanyasdanceco.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

92/ 100Excellent

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 54 pages and 658 assets of www.tanyasdanceco.com, starting from https://www.tanyasdanceco.com/. It scored 92 out of 100, an excellent result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (19), heavy assets (3), title tags (8); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−2.9), heavy assets (−1.8), title tags (−1.5). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
54
Assets fetched
658
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

712 of 716 discovered URLs were fetched, 4 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 20 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags8 issues
    8 of 36 pages have title issues. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.5 points
  • Meta descriptions19 issues
    19 of 36 pages have meta description issues. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.9 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 36 pages have heading issues. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links1 issue
    1 internal link point at 1 broken URL.
    −0.4 points
  • Links to other sites317 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 11 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 20 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 noted
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    7 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 36 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 17 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 30 image references have no alt attribute. 1 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 658 fetched assets.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pages5 issues
    5 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage5 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 36 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 5 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.6 points
  • Internal link counts17 noted
    Internal link counts for 53 pages; 17 worth a look.
  • Thin content3 issues
    3 of 36 pages have fewer than 200 words. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.5 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 54 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals17 noted
    17 of 53 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives53 noted
    53 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text3 noted
    3 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure1 noted
    1 of 36 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length8 noted
    8 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 53 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 16 response headers recorded across 712 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 53 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 57 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2325 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.tanyasdanceco.com scores 92%, higher than 92% of the 2325 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 76 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 63 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites92% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has a strong health score but needs fixes for broken links, redirects, non-200 responses, title tags, and meta descriptions. Prioritize these corrections for improved user experience and SEO.

  1. 1

    Fix the Broken Link

    Why: Improves user experience and SEO.

    How: Update the link to the correct URL or remove it.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: Redirects can slow down site speed and dilute page authority.

    How: Ensure the sitemap.xml points directly to the final URL or remove redundant links.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: 404 errors negatively affect user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove non-existing URLs. Check all links pointing to broken pages.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Revise Title Tags

    Why: Improved tags can enhance click-through rates and relevance.

    How: Shorten titles to under 60 characters and ensure uniqueness across pages.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Well-crafted descriptions can boost click-through rates.

    How: Shorten descriptions to under 160 characters while maintaining relevance.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has security configurations that could be improved. The Content Security Policy permits potentially harmful inline scripts, reducing its effectiveness against script injection. Additionally, third-party scripts are used without integrity checks, making the site vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. These issues should be addressed promptly.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Weak Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: The current CSP allows 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval', exposing the site to injection attacks.

    Fix: Update the Content Security Policy by removing 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' and explicitly defining allowed sources.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Unsecured Third-Party ScriptsLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from third-party sources lack Subresource Integrity protection, increasing risk if those sources are compromised.

    Fix: Consider implementing a robust Content Security Policy that includes allowed hosts, or switch to scripts with Subresource Integrity support.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • NoteContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, but it allows inline or eval scripts ('unsafe-inline' / 'unsafe-eval'), which removes most of its protection against injected scripts.

    • https://www.tanyasdanceco.com/ → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.tanyasdanceco.com/about → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.tanyasdanceco.com/tdc-recital-sponsors → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.tanyasdanceco.com/classes → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.tanyasdanceco.com/schedule → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.tanyasdanceco.com/classes/ages-7-up → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.tanyasdanceco.com/classes/ages-3-4 → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.tanyasdanceco.com/classes/ages-5-6 → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.tanyasdanceco.com/classes/adult → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.tanyasdanceco.com/dance-tiers/local-competition → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.tanyasdanceco.com/dance-tiers/travel-competition → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
    • https://www.tanyasdanceco.com/dance-tiers/recreational → default-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:;
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • beta.leadconnectorhq.com (40 script tags)
11 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 53 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 53 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 53 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 53 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.tanyasdanceco.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.tanyasdanceco.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.tanyasdanceco.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.tanyasdanceco.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.