Scanned sites / www.swlaw.com / 2026-10-02-1643

www.swlaw.com scan from 10/2/2026, 4:43:09 PM

Scan 2026-10-02-1643

Scanned 10/2/2026, 4:43:09 PM, finished 10/3/2026, 7:56:59 AM. Found on page 1 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.swlaw.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

78/ 100Good

On October 2, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 4496 pages and 1504 assets of www.swlaw.com, starting from https://www.swlaw.com/. It scored 78 out of 100, a good result. 13 of 16 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (12), title tags (1,964), meta descriptions (2,005); 2 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−5.9), meta descriptions (−4.8). 1 check found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
4496
Assets fetched
1504
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 16
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

6,000 of 6,000 discovered URLs were fetched, 19,693 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 3259 left unchecked.

  • Title tags1,964 issues
    1964 of 2022 pages have title issues. 1333 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.9 points
  • Meta descriptions2,005 issues
    2005 of 2022 pages have meta description issues. 1333 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.8 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 2022 pages have heading issues. 1333 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links32 issues
    50 internal links point at 32 broken URLs.
    −0.2 points
  • Links to other sites18 issues
    18 destinations answered with an error, 169 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 3259 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.2 points
  • Redirects1,112 issues
    1110 redirecting URLs, 4 of them chained.
    −1.3 points
  • Non-200 responses32 issues
    1143 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1141 of them are pages, 32 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability68 issues
    68 of 3355 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.2 points
  • Image alt text1 issue
    1 of 21095 image references have no alt attribute. 10801 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets12 issues
    12 assets larger than 500 KB among 1504 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage2,022 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 2022 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3.6 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 500 pages.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 2022 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1333 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content32 issues
    3 groups of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

1953 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.swlaw.com scores 78%, higher than 39% of the 1953 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0561120%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 2 sites38%: 2 sites39%: 1 site40%: 2 sites41%: 2 sites42%: 0 sites43%: 1 site44%: 0 sites45%: 4 sites46%: 3 sites47%: 3 sites48%: 2 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 4 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 7 sites55%: 4 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 7 sites58%: 15 sites59%: 7 sites60%: 10 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 17 sites63%: 16 sites64%: 11 sites65%: 22 sites66%: 21 sites67%: 37 sites68%: 31 sites69%: 27 sites70%: 39 sites71%: 41 sites72%: 58 sites73%: 53 sites74%: 51 sites75%: 63 sites76%: 78 sites77%: 74 sites78%: 91 sites79%: 72 sites80%: 91 sites81%: 112 sites82%: 86 sites83%: 89 sites84%: 88 sites85%: 72 sites86%: 77 sites87%: 67 sites88%: 66 sites89%: 56 sites90%: 37 sites91%: 37 sites92%: 30 sites93%: 17 sites94%: 13 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 8 sites97%: 8 sites98%: 2 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 55 sites78% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site has several issues that could impact SEO and user experience. Fixing broken links, optimizing redirects, and correcting title and meta description issues should be your top priorities.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links hurt user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify and update the internal links pointing to broken URLs. Redirect if necessary.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Optimize Redirects

    Why: Too many redirects can impact loading speed and SEO.

    How: Reduce the number of redirects and eliminate chained redirects to improve site performance.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Correct Title Tags

    Why: Improving title tags helps with search visibility.

    How: Review pages with title issues and optimize for length and relevance.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Optimize Meta Descriptions

    Why: Accurate meta descriptions enhance click-through rates from search results.

    How: Create unique, concise meta descriptions for all pages lacking one.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Improve Indexability

    Why: Addressing indexability warnings can enhance search engine crawling.

    How: Review issues with canonical tags and indexability settings on affected pages.

    Checks: indexability

  6. 6

    Address Duplicate Content

    Why: Duplicate content can confuse search engines and dilute rankings.

    How: Identify duplicate pages and implement canonical tags to clarify the preferred version.

    Checks: duplicate-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has some security vulnerabilities and configurations that could expose it to risks. Key issues include outdated libraries and a Content Security Policy that could enable attacks. Addressing these problems is crucial to improving the site's security posture.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library: jQuery 3.1.3Medium

    Why it matters: This version of jQuery contains known vulnerabilities that could be exploited if the site implements them incorrectly.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0, which addresses these vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  2. 2

    Content Security Policy Too PermissiveMedium

    Why it matters: The current CSP allows inline scripts and eval, which could facilitate XSS attacks.

    Fix: Update the Content-Security-Policy to remove 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval'. Only allow trusted sources.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Third-Party Scripts Without Integrity ChecksLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains lack Subresource Integrity, increasing the risk if those domains are compromised.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) on all external scripts or enforce a CSP that only allows trusted sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.1.3. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 3.1.3 in https://www.swlaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jquery.mi…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, but it allows inline or eval scripts ('unsafe-inline' / 'unsafe-eval'), which removes most of its protection against injected scripts.

    • https://www.swlaw.com/ → script-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' 'self' *; style-src 'unsafe-inline' 'self' *;
    • https://www.swlaw.com/people/ → script-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' 'self' *; style-src 'unsafe-inline' 'self' *;
    • https://www.swlaw.com/services/ → script-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' 'self' *; style-src 'unsafe-inline' 'self' *;
    • https://www.swlaw.com/locations/ → script-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' 'self' *; style-src 'unsafe-inline' 'self' *;
    • https://www.swlaw.com/media/ → script-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' 'self' *; style-src 'unsafe-inline' 'self' *;
    • https://www.swlaw.com/alumni/ → script-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' 'self' *; style-src 'unsafe-inline' 'self' *;
    • https://www.swlaw.com/careers/ → script-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' 'self' *; style-src 'unsafe-inline' 'self' *;
    • https://www.swlaw.com/executive-order-corner/ → script-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' 'self' *; style-src 'unsafe-inline' 'self' *;
    • https://www.swlaw.com/tariff/ → script-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' 'self' *; style-src 'unsafe-inline' 'self' *;
    • https://www.swlaw.com/about/ → script-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' 'self' *; style-src 'unsafe-inline' 'self' *;
    • https://www.swlaw.com/attorney-development/ → script-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' 'self' *; style-src 'unsafe-inline' 'self' *;
    • https://www.swlaw.com/diversity-inclusion-belonging/ → script-src 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' 'self' *; style-src 'unsafe-inline' 'self' *;
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • consent.trustarc.com (40 script tags)
    • static.cloud.coveo.com (40 script tags)
    • challenges.cloudflare.com (5 script tags)
12 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 3355 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 3355 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 3355 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 3355 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 3355 HTML pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 3355 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    195 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.swlaw.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.swlaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.swlaw.com?

www.swlaw.com scan 2026-10-02-1643 | DIY SEO Hub