Scanned sites / www.sugarswing.com / 2026-09-14-0222

www.sugarswing.com scan from 2026-09-14 02:22:30 UTC DR 16

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.sugarswing.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-14-0222

Scanned 2026-09-14 02:22:30 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 02:44:18 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.sugarswing.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

58/ 100Needs work

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 251 pages and 214 assets of www.sugarswing.com, starting from https://www.sugarswing.com/. It scored 58 out of 100, a result that needs work. 13 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (158), meta descriptions (188), heavy assets (84); 5 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−8.1), meta descriptions (−7.8), heavy assets (−6). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: High1 high, 5 medium and 3 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
251
Assets fetched
214
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

465 of 468 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 failed. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 123 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags158 issues
    158 of 188 pages have title issues. 6 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −8.1 points
  • Meta descriptions188 issues
    188 of 188 pages have meta description issues. 6 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.8 points
  • Headings12 issues
    12 of 188 pages have heading issues. 6 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.4 points
  • Broken links12 issues
    13 internal links point at 12 broken URLs.
    −1.2 points
  • Links to other sites3 issues
    3 destinations answered with an error, 60 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 116 destinations checked.
    −0.6 points
  • Redirects50 issues
    69 redirecting URLs, 14 of them chained.
    −1 points
  • Non-200 responses14 issues
    94 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 58 of them are pages, 14 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.7 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability108 issues
    108 of 194 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −5.6 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 800 image references have no alt attribute. 154 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets84 issues
    84 assets larger than 500 KB among 214 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages39 issues
    39 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.8 points
  • Sitemap coverage136 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 89 URLs: 99 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 37 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −4.2 points
  • Internal link counts95 noted
    Internal link counts for 194 pages; 95 worth a look.
  • Thin content99 issues
    99 of 188 pages have fewer than 200 words. 6 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.1 points
  • Duplicate content47 issues
    22 groups of pages with identical HTML.
    −1.9 points
  • URL format108 noted
    108 of 251 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals108 noted
    108 of 194 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives93 noted
    93 pages carry a robots directive; 101 carry none.
  • Anchor text44 noted
    44 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure107 noted
    107 of 188 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 6 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length5 noted
    0 images over 100 KB; 5 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies8 noted
    8 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 194 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 465 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 194 pages; 73 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2343 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.sugarswing.com scores 58%, higher than 5% of the 2343 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0591170%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 117 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 88 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites58% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several critical issues affecting usability and SEO performance. Prioritize addressing broken links and redirects first, followed by fixing title tags and meta descriptions for better optimization.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Eliminating broken links improves user experience and SEO ranking.

    How: Identify broken links from the crawl report, replace or remove the links on your site.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Reduce Chained Redirects

    Why: Streamlining redirects enhances site speed and user experience.

    How: Consolidate chained redirects to a single redirect for efficiency.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Page accessibility directly affects user experience and SEO.

    How: Check the URLs with non-200 responses and fix or remove them.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Improving title tags can lead to better click-through rates from search results.

    How: Review and revise title tags to be descriptive and between 30-60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions influence click-through rates and search visibility.

    How: Create and implement unique meta descriptions for all pages, ideally 50-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: Proper heading usage improves content readability and SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has one H1 tag and proper hierarchy for other headings.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security risks, including forms sending unencrypted data, missing security headers, vulnerable libraries, and exposed directory listings. It is critical to implement fixes, especially for high-severity issues, to protect user data and improve site security.

  • 1 high
  • 5 medium
  • 3 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Forms Sending Data Over HTTPHigh

    Why it matters: Data submitted via this form can be intercepted by attackers, exposing sensitive information.

    Fix: Change the form action to use HTTPS instead of HTTP.

    Evidence: Forms over HTTPS

  2. 2

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be exposed to man-in-the-middle attacks when accessing the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload'.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  3. 3

    No Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of a CSP allows content from potentially harmful locations to be executed.

    Fix: Implement a CSP header, for example: 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  4. 4

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: The absence of X-Frame-Options may allow your site to be embedded in malicious sites.

    Fix: Add the header 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to your HTTP responses.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  5. 5

    Vulnerable JavaScript LibrariesMedium

    Why it matters: Outdated libraries contain known vulnerabilities that may be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  6. 6

    Exposed Directory ListingsMedium

    Why it matters: Publicly accessible directory listings may provide sensitive information.

    Fix: Restrict access to these directories or disable directory listing in server configuration.

    Evidence: Exposed files and listings

  7. 7

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without this protection, browsers might misinterpret files and run them as scripts.

    Fix: Add the header 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to all responses.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  8. 8

    Software Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Revealing software versions can help attackers exploit known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Configure your server to not display version details.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  9. 9

    Mixed Content DetectedLow

    Why it matters: Loading resources over HTTP on HTTPS pages may lead to security warnings and data exposure.

    Fix: Ensure all resources are loaded via HTTPS.

    Evidence: Mixed content

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.sugarswing.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/lessons/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/performance-teams/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/instructors/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/cancellation-policy/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/music/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/levels/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/discounts/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/private-lessons/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/faq/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/dances/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/open-house/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 194 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.sugarswing.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/lessons/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/performance-teams/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/instructors/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/cancellation-policy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/music/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/levels/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/discounts/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/private-lessons/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/faq/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/dances/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/open-house/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.sugarswing.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/lessons/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/performance-teams/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/instructors/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/cancellation-policy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/music/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/levels/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/discounts/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/private-lessons/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/faq/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/dances/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/open-house/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.sugarswing.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/lessons/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/performance-teams/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/instructors/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/cancellation-policy/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/music/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/levels/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/discounts/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/private-lessons/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/faq/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/dances/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/open-house/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: nginx/1.29.8 (257 responses)
    • server: Apache (208 responses)
  • FoundMixed contentLow

    25 resources on HTTPS pages are loaded over plain HTTP.

    • https://www.sugarswing.com/open-house/ loads image http://www.sugarswing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Open-House-2017.jpg
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/open-house/ loads image http://www.sugarswing.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Open-House-2017.jpg?w=640
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/swing/ loads image http://www.sugarswing.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/0218-e1526969801772.jpg
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/swing/ loads image http://www.sugarswing.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/0218-e1526969801772.jpg?w=640
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/blues/ loads image http://img.youtube.com/vi/TAIWkANToPA/0.jpg
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/african-caribbean/ loads image http://www.sugarswing.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/workshop1.jpg
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/african-caribbean/ loads image http://www.sugarswing.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/workshop1.jpg?w=640
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/summer-solstice/ loads image http://www.sugarswing.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Solstice18_facebook-banner.jpg
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/summer-solstice/ loads image http://www.sugarswing.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Solstice18_facebook-banner.jpg?w=640
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/madame-jazz/ loads image http://www.sugarswing.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/madame-jazz-banner-big.jpg
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/madame-jazz/ loads image http://www.sugarswing.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/madame-jazz-banner-big.jpg?w=640
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/wedding-rental/ loads image http://www.sugarswing.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/O62iRng-1024x768.jpg
  • FoundForms over HTTPSHigh

    1 form would send what visitors type over plain HTTP, where it can be read or changed on the way.

    • https://www.sugarswing.com/subscribe/ posts a form to http://sugarswing.createsend.com/t/i/s/awky/ over plain HTTP
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    3 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.4.2, jQuery 1.12.4, jQuery 3.3.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.4.2 in https://www.sugarswing.com/code/js/jquery-1.4.2.min.js: CVE-2012-6708 (selector XSS), CVE-2015-9251, CVE-2019-11358, CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023; fixed in 3.5.0
    • jQuery 1.12.4 in https://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.12.4.js: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
    • jQuery 3.3.1 in https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • FoundExposed files and listingsMedium

    99 URLs answered 200 for files that should not be public: directory listing.

    • https://www.sugarswing.com/media/Music/ → directory listing
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/media/Music/?C=N;O=D → directory listing
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/media/Music/?C=M;O=A → directory listing
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/media/Music/?C=S;O=A → directory listing
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/media/Music/?C=D;O=A → directory listing
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/media/ → directory listing
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/media/Music/60-100%20BPM%20Slow%20Lindy%20Blues/ → directory listing
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/media/Music/100-150%20BPM%20Slow-Med%20Lindy%20-%20Triple%20Step%20Swing/ → directory listing
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/media/Music/160-200BPM%20Med-Fast%20Lindy%20-%20Single%20Step%20Jive%20-%20East%20Coast/ → directory listing
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/media/Music/200-250%20BPM%20Lindy/ → directory listing
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/media/Music/Charleston/ → directory listing
    • https://www.sugarswing.com/media/Music/Jazz%201/ → directory listing
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (39 script tags)
    • js.createsend1.com (2 script tags)
    • stats.wp.com (39 script tags)
    • ajax.googleapis.com (3 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
2 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 194 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.sugarswing.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.sugarswing.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.sugarswing.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.sugarswing.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.