Scanned sites / www.studiommissoula.com / 2026-09-11-2246

www.studiommissoula.com scan from 2026-09-11 22:46:35 UTC DR 3

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.studiommissoula.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-11-2246

Scanned 2026-09-11 22:46:35 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 01:55:36 UTC

Site: https://www.studiommissoula.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

68/ 100Needs work

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 263 pages and 585 assets of www.studiommissoula.com, starting from https://www.studiommissoula.com/. It scored 68 out of 100, a result that needs work. 13 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (258), headings (256), indexability (115); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−8), headings (−6), indexability (−4.5). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium5 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
263
Assets fetched
585
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

848 of 848 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 176 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags97 issues
    97 of 258 pages have title issues.
    −3.8 points
  • Meta descriptions258 issues
    258 of 258 pages have meta description issues.
    −8 points
  • Headings256 issues
    256 of 258 pages have heading issues.
    −6 points
  • Broken links3 issues
    32 internal links point at 3 broken URLs.
    −0.2 points
  • Links to other sites9 issues
    9 destinations answered with an error, 11 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 174 destinations checked.
    −1.4 points
  • Redirects2 issues
    3 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses3 issues
    8 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 5 of them are pages, 3 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability115 issues
    115 of 258 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −4.5 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 2611 image references have no alt attribute. 585 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets7 issues
    7 assets larger than 500 KB among 585 fetched assets.
    −4.2 points
  • Orphan pages12 issues
    12 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.2 points
  • Sitemap coverage105 issues
    11 sitemaps listing 165 URLs: 93 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 12 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.4 points
  • Internal link counts87 noted
    Internal link counts for 258 pages; 87 worth a look.
  • Thin content30 issues
    30 of 258 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −0.9 points
  • Duplicate content3 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format5 noted
    5 of 263 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals115 noted
    115 of 258 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives258 noted
    258 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text157 noted
    157 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure1 noted
    1 of 258 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length78 noted
    78 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 258 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 848 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 258 pages; 188 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2326 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.studiommissoula.com scores 68%, higher than 14% of the 2326 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 4 sites52%: 11 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 63 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 23 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites68% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several critical SEO issues that need addressing, including broken links and title tag problems. Implement the recommended fixes to improve your site's health score.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Removing broken links improves user experience and site credibility.

    How: Identify and update or remove internal links pointing to the broken URLs.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: Chained redirects can slow down site performance and confuse search engines.

    How: Eliminate the chained redirect by linking directly to the final URL.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Fixing non-200 statuses prevents issues with crawling and indexing your pages.

    How: Change the status of the impacted URLs to return a 200 response.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Improving title tags can enhance rankings and click-through rates.

    How: Revise the titles to be unique and compliant with best practices (50-60 characters).

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Implement Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions are crucial for click-through rates from search engines.

    How: Add concise and compelling meta descriptions to all pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Fix Headings Structure

    Why: Correct headings improve accessibility and help search engines understand content structure.

    How: Ensure each page has a proper H1 tag that accurately represents the page content.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website lacks several important security headers and has a vulnerable JavaScript library. This can expose your site to risks like interception, clickjacking, and attacks through outdated software. Addressing these issues will significantly enhance the security of your site.

  • 0 high
  • 5 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted if they access your site via HTTP.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absent CSP allows unauthorized scripts and resources to load, increasing XSS risks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of this header permits clickjacking attacks by allowing your site to be framed.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library DetectedMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery 2.1.0 has known vulnerabilities that may pose risks depending on usage.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or higher.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Leaked Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: Exposing your Google API key can lead to unauthorized usage and potential costs.

    Fix: Restrict the key in the Google Cloud console by HTTP referrer and consider server-side usage.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  6. 6

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this, a browser may incorrectly interpret files, leading to potential execution vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  7. 7

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains could be altered, affecting your site's integrity.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) where possible, or use a CSP to control script sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2026/09/september-happenings-2/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2026/09/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2026/03/summer-program-info/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2026/03/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/04/april-happenings-4/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/04/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/03/hi-studio-m-family/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/03/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/02/summer-program/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/02/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/02/february-happenings-5/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 258 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2026/09/september-happenings-2/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2026/09/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2026/03/summer-program-info/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2026/03/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/04/april-happenings-4/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/04/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/03/hi-studio-m-family/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/03/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/02/summer-program/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/02/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/02/february-happenings-5/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2026/09/september-happenings-2/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2026/09/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2026/03/summer-program-info/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2026/03/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/04/april-happenings-4/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/04/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/03/hi-studio-m-family/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/03/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/02/summer-program/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/02/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/02/february-happenings-5/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2026/09/september-happenings-2/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2026/09/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2026/03/summer-program-info/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2026/03/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/04/april-happenings-4/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/04/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/03/hi-studio-m-family/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/03/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/02/summer-program/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/02/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.studiommissoula.com/2025/02/february-happenings-5/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.1.0. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.1.0 in https://www.studiommissoula.com/wp-content/plugins/arabesque-core/shortcodes/co…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…UY (39 chars) in https://www.studiommissoula.com/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • maps.googleapis.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (40 script tags)
6 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 258 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    40 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.studiommissoula.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.studiommissoula.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.studiommissoula.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.studiommissoula.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.