Scanned sites / www.strategiccriminaldefence.com / 2026-11-05-1859

www.strategiccriminaldefence.com scan from 2026-11-05 18:59:04 UTC DR 29

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.strategiccriminaldefence.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-05-1859

Scanned 2026-11-05 18:59:04 UTC, finished 2026-11-05 19:08:16 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

79/ 100Good

On November 5, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 569 pages and 725 assets of www.strategiccriminaldefence.com, starting from https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/. It scored 79 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (275), heavy assets (40), meta descriptions (294); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−6.2), heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−5.3). 13 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium5 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
569
Assets fetched
725
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

1,294 of 1,294 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 783 left unchecked.

  • Title tags275 issues
    275 of 416 pages have title issues. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.2 points
  • Meta descriptions294 issues
    294 of 416 pages have meta description issues. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.3 points
  • Headings9 issues
    9 of 416 pages have heading issues. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links5 issues
    5 internal links point at 5 broken URLs.
    −0.2 points
  • Links to other sites3 issues
    3 destinations answered with an error, 99 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 783 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.3 points
  • Redirects129 issues
    123 redirecting URLs, 8 of them chained.
    −1.2 points
  • Non-200 responses5 issues
    133 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 127 of them are pages, 5 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability22 issues
    22 of 442 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.5 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 132 image references have no alt attribute. 55 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets40 issues
    40 assets larger than 500 KB among 725 fetched assets. 1 document over that size is listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages19 issues
    19 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.2 points
  • Sitemap coverage56 issues
    18 sitemaps listing 381 URLs: 36 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 19 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.8 points
  • Internal link counts104 noted
    Internal link counts for 442 pages; 104 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 416 pages have fewer than 200 words. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content5 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format13 noted
    13 of 569 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals26 noted
    26 of 442 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives442 noted
    442 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text35 noted
    35 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure106 noted
    106 of 416 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length19 noted
    19 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies2 noted
    2 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 442 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured data61 noted
    442 of 416 indexable pages carry structured data: WebSite (442), BreadcrumbList (429), ListItem (429), LegalService (424), Organization (423). 61 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicates9 noted
    9 pages in 2 groups read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 442 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions34 noted
    34 of 397 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination31 noted
    46 pages in pagination sequences; 31 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    2 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 1294 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 442 pages; 191 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling100 noted
    100 words an English dictionary does not know, on 240 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2866 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.strategiccriminaldefence.com scores 79%, higher than 44% of the 2866 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751490%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 83 sites75%: 86 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 131 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 120 sites84%: 133 sites85%: 105 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 95 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 54 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 149 sites79% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The crawl revealed several areas for improvement on your site, including broken links, redirects, and title/meta description issues. Addressing these will enhance usability and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links can harm user experience and SEO performance.

    How: Update or remove the five internal links that point at broken URLs.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Reduce Redirects

    Why: Excessive redirects can slow down page loading and dilute authority.

    How: Eliminate unnecessary redirects and resolve the eight chained redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Improving page status ensures users and search engines can access content.

    How: Investigate and fix 133 URLs that return non-200 responses.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Title tags are crucial for SEO; issues can affect rankings and click-through rates.

    How: Revise the title tags for 275 pages to meet best practices.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions improve your pages' visibility in search results.

    How: Create meta descriptions for 294 pages that currently have issues.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow down load times and affect user experience.

    How: Compress or optimize the listed heavy assets to enhance performance.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several important security weaknesses that could expose visitors to risks. Key issues include missing security headers like HSTS and Content Security Policy, inadequate cookie protections, and a vulnerable JavaScript library. Addressing these should be a priority to enhance the security posture of your site.

  • 0 high
  • 5 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted when entering the site via HTTP.

    Fix: Add the header `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload` to all HTML responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: The absence of a CSP allows scripts to load from any source, increasing XSS risks.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy header. For example, `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';`.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Lack of Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Pages can be embedded in frames on malicious sites, risking user interaction theft.

    Fix: Add the header `X-Frame-Options: DENY` or utilize CSP with `frame-ancestors`.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Inadequate Cookie Security FlagsMedium

    Why it matters: Cookies lacking Secure, HttpOnly, and SameSite flags risk exposure through unauthorized access.

    Fix: Set flags on cookies as follows: `Secure`, `HttpOnly`, and `SameSite=Lax` or `Strict`.

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  5. 5

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library FoundMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 2.10.5 introduces known vulnerabilities that can be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or higher to mitigate these vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  6. 6

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without this, browsers may execute files as scripts based on content, risking exploitation.

    Fix: Add the header `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff` to all HTML responses.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  7. 7

    Lack of Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Without a policy, full URLs are sent when users navigate away, exposing sensitive information.

    Fix: Use the header `Referrer-Policy: no-referrer` or another appropriate value.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/reviews/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/our-firm/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/in-the-community/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/careers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/michael-oykhman/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ian-savage/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/joseph-beller/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shaun-leochko/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shervin-sabet/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/cara-lebenzon/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 442 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/reviews/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/our-firm/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/in-the-community/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/careers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/michael-oykhman/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ian-savage/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/joseph-beller/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shaun-leochko/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shervin-sabet/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/cara-lebenzon/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/reviews/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/our-firm/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/in-the-community/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/careers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/michael-oykhman/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ian-savage/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/joseph-beller/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shaun-leochko/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shervin-sabet/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/cara-lebenzon/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/reviews/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/our-firm/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/in-the-community/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/careers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/michael-oykhman/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ian-savage/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/joseph-beller/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shaun-leochko/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shervin-sabet/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/cara-lebenzon/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/reviews/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/our-firm/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/in-the-community/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/careers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/michael-oykhman/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ian-savage/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/joseph-beller/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shaun-leochko/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shervin-sabet/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/cara-lebenzon/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/reviews/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/our-firm/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/in-the-community/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/careers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/michael-oykhman/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ian-savage/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/joseph-beller/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shaun-leochko/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shervin-sabet/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/cara-lebenzon/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    6 of 8 cookies are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • 05 Nov 2026 19:30:34 GMT (set by https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/firearm-offence-lawyers/blank) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 05 Nov 2026 19:30:35 GMT (set by https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/fine/blank) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 05 Nov 2026 19:34:41 GMT (set by https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/10/arr…) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 05 Nov 2026 19:32:40 GMT (set by https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/toronto/property-crime-lawyers/blank) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 05 Nov 2026 19:32:49 GMT (set by https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/victoria/theft-lawyers/blank) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 05 Nov 2026 19:34:50 GMT (set by https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/faq/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/09…) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.10.5. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.10.5 in https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/pla…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (1294 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (502 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • analytics.ahrefs.com (40 script tags)
    • 471e3398d1e347219e0b7186b29f5cf2.js.ubembed.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (39 script tags)
6 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 442 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    40 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.strategiccriminaldefence.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.strategiccriminaldefence.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.strategiccriminaldefence.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.strategiccriminaldefence.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.