Scanned sites / www.strategiccriminaldefence.com / 2026-10-09-0221

www.strategiccriminaldefence.com scan from 10/9/2026, 2:21:38 AM DR 29

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-10-09-0221

Scanned 10/9/2026, 2:21:38 AM, finished 10/9/2026, 3:05:18 AM. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

79/ 100Good

On October 9, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 571 pages and 687 assets of www.strategiccriminaldefence.com, starting from https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/. It scored 79 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 23 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (275), heavy assets (37), meta descriptions (296); 3 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−6.2), heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−5.3). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
571
Assets fetched
687
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 23
CoverageComplete crawl

1,258 of 1,258 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 785 left unchecked.

  • Title tags275 issues
    275 of 418 pages have title issues. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.2 points
  • Meta descriptions296 issues
    296 of 418 pages have meta description issues. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.3 points
  • Headings9 issues
    9 of 418 pages have heading issues. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links5 issues
    5 internal links point at 5 broken URLs.
    −0.2 points
  • Links to other sites3 issues
    3 destinations answered with an error, 97 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 785 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.3 points
  • Redirects129 issues
    123 redirecting URLs, 8 of them chained.
    −1.2 points
  • Non-200 responses5 issues
    133 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 127 of them are pages, 5 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability22 issues
    22 of 444 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.5 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 95 image references have no alt attribute. 41 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets37 issues
    37 assets larger than 500 KB among 687 fetched assets. 1 document over that size is listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages19 issues
    19 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.2 points
  • Sitemap coverage56 issues
    18 sitemaps listing 383 URLs: 36 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 19 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.8 points
  • Internal link counts108 noted
    Internal link counts for 444 pages; 108 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 418 pages have fewer than 200 words. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content5 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format13 noted
    13 of 571 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals26 noted
    26 of 444 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives444 noted
    444 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text35 noted
    35 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure106 noted
    106 of 418 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length3 noted
    3 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies2 noted
    2 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2169 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.strategiccriminaldefence.com scores 79%, higher than 48% of the 2169 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0551090%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 1 site28%: 0 sites29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 2 sites41%: 2 sites42%: 0 sites43%: 2 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 6 sites47%: 4 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 4 sites50%: 4 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 9 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 8 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 6 sites60%: 14 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 24 sites64%: 18 sites65%: 37 sites66%: 29 sites67%: 33 sites68%: 33 sites69%: 38 sites70%: 42 sites71%: 66 sites72%: 73 sites73%: 67 sites74%: 60 sites75%: 75 sites76%: 80 sites77%: 91 sites78%: 98 sites79%: 87 sites80%: 103 sites81%: 101 sites82%: 109 sites83%: 91 sites84%: 99 sites85%: 73 sites86%: 68 sites87%: 63 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 57 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 40 sites92%: 27 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 13 sites95%: 7 sites96%: 5 sites97%: 11 sites98%: 2 sites99%: 1 site100%: 62 sites79% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site has several areas for improvement regarding user experience and SEO optimization. Focus on fixing broken links, redirects, and title/meta description issues to enhance search visibility and site health.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Correcting these links improves user experience and site credibility.

    How: Update or remove internal links pointing to the broken URLs listed in the crawl report.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Reduce Redirects

    Why: Minimizing redirects improves site performance and user experience.

    How: Evaluate and consolidate redirected URLs, ideally eliminating unnecessary hops.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses hinder accessibility and affect SEO.

    How: Identify the URLs with issues and ensure they return a correct status or fix misconfigurations.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Optimizing title tags enhances click-through rates and ranking potential.

    How: Review and adjust titles to be concise and relevant, keeping them under the 60-character limit.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Optimize Meta Descriptions

    Why: Improving missing or duplicated meta descriptions can boost visibility in search results.

    How: Create unique and compelling meta descriptions for the 296 pages identified.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Address Heavy Assets

    Why: Reducing page load times through optimization enhances user experience and search ranking.

    How: Compress large assets, focusing on the identified stylesheets, and consider caching strategies.

    Evidence: 802 KB of stylesheet, loaded by 231 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    231 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security headers missing, which increases the risk of various attacks. Most critically, the absence of HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) can expose users to interception. Additionally, the use of an outdated JavaScript library could also pose risks, depending on its implementation.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of HSTS allows interception on first request by visitors using HTTP.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: No CSP means no restrictions on script sources, risking XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing Clickjacking Protection (X-Frame-Options)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of this header allows embedding in frames, leading to clickjacking risks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library DetectedMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery 2.10.5 has known vulnerabilities, increasing security risks.

    Fix: Upgrade to jQuery version 3.5.0 or higher.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing MIME Sniffing Protection (X-Content-Type-Options)Low

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may execute files inappropriately based on content.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Without a referrer policy, sensitive URLs may be exposed when users navigate away.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  7. 7

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: This can limit risk by disabling unused features like camera or microphone.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self)

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/reviews/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/our-firm/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/in-the-community/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/careers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/michael-oykhman/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ian-savage/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/joseph-beller/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shaun-leochko/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shervin-sabet/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/cara-lebenzon/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 444 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/reviews/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/our-firm/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/in-the-community/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/careers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/michael-oykhman/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ian-savage/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/joseph-beller/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shaun-leochko/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shervin-sabet/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/cara-lebenzon/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/reviews/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/our-firm/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/in-the-community/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/careers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/michael-oykhman/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ian-savage/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/joseph-beller/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shaun-leochko/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shervin-sabet/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/cara-lebenzon/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/reviews/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/our-firm/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/in-the-community/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/careers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/michael-oykhman/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ian-savage/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/joseph-beller/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shaun-leochko/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shervin-sabet/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/cara-lebenzon/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/reviews/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/our-firm/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/in-the-community/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/careers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/michael-oykhman/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ian-savage/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/joseph-beller/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shaun-leochko/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shervin-sabet/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/cara-lebenzon/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/reviews/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/our-firm/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/in-the-community/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/careers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/michael-oykhman/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ian-savage/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/joseph-beller/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shaun-leochko/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shervin-sabet/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/cara-lebenzon/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.10.5. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.10.5 in https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/pla…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (1258 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (504 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • analytics.ahrefs.com (40 script tags)
    • 471e3398d1e347219e0b7186b29f5cf2.js.ubembed.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (39 script tags)
7 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 444 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    39 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.strategiccriminaldefence.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.strategiccriminaldefence.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.strategiccriminaldefence.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.strategiccriminaldefence.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.
www.strategiccriminaldefence.com scan 2026-10-09-0221 | DIY SEO Hub