Scanned sites / www.strategiccriminaldefence.com / 2026-10-04-1457

www.strategiccriminaldefence.com scan from 10/4/2026, 2:57:01 PM

Scan 2026-10-04-1457

Scanned 10/4/2026, 2:57:01 PM, finished 10/4/2026, 3:36:47 PM. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

79/ 100Good

On October 4, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 571 pages and 755 assets of www.strategiccriminaldefence.com, starting from https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/. It scored 79 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 23 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (275), heavy assets (37), meta descriptions (296); 3 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−6.2), heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−5.3). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
571
Assets fetched
755
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 23
CoverageComplete crawl

1,326 of 1,326 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 787 left unchecked.

  • Title tags275 issues
    275 of 418 pages have title issues. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.2 points
  • Meta descriptions296 issues
    296 of 418 pages have meta description issues. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.3 points
  • Headings9 issues
    9 of 418 pages have heading issues. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links5 issues
    5 internal links point at 5 broken URLs.
    −0.2 points
  • Links to other sites4 issues
    4 destinations answered with an error, 97 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 787 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects129 issues
    123 redirecting URLs, 8 of them chained.
    −1.2 points
  • Non-200 responses5 issues
    140 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 127 of them are pages, 5 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability22 issues
    22 of 444 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.5 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 112 image references have no alt attribute. 51 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets37 issues
    37 assets larger than 500 KB among 755 fetched assets. 1 document over that size is listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages19 issues
    19 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.2 points
  • Sitemap coverage56 issues
    18 sitemaps listing 383 URLs: 36 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 19 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.8 points
  • Internal link counts108 noted
    Internal link counts for 444 pages; 108 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 418 pages have fewer than 200 words. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content5 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format13 noted
    13 of 571 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals26 noted
    26 of 444 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives444 noted
    444 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text36 noted
    36 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure106 noted
    106 of 418 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 26 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length4 noted
    4 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies2 noted
    2 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2061 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.strategiccriminaldefence.com scores 79%, higher than 47% of the 2061 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0531050%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 1 site28%: 0 sites29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 1 site36%: 2 sites37%: 2 sites38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 2 sites41%: 1 site42%: 0 sites43%: 0 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 4 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 3 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 6 sites55%: 8 sites56%: 5 sites57%: 11 sites58%: 14 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 11 sites61%: 9 sites62%: 18 sites63%: 18 sites64%: 18 sites65%: 36 sites66%: 27 sites67%: 39 sites68%: 33 sites69%: 29 sites70%: 36 sites71%: 59 sites72%: 64 sites73%: 60 sites74%: 59 sites75%: 77 sites76%: 76 sites77%: 81 sites78%: 96 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 105 sites81%: 100 sites82%: 101 sites83%: 87 sites84%: 90 sites85%: 70 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 66 sites88%: 68 sites89%: 47 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 42 sites92%: 24 sites93%: 18 sites94%: 15 sites95%: 7 sites96%: 5 sites97%: 9 sites98%: 2 sites99%: 1 site100%: 56 sites79% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The website has multiple issues including broken links, redirect chains, and title/meta description problems. Addressing these will enhance user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links can harm user experience and SEO rankings.

    How: Update or remove links leading to broken URLs. For instance, fix links like 'jail time' in the fine page to lead to valid content.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Reduce Redirects

    Why: Chained redirects can slow down page loading and degrade SEO performance.

    How: Simplify redirects by ensuring they point directly to the final URL. Review and eliminate chains like those found in the FAQ section.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Create Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing meta descriptions can lead to lower click-through rates from search results.

    How: Write unique meta descriptions for 245 pages that don’t have them. For example, provide a description for the 'Alberta IRS Fail Penalty' page.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Overly long title tags can get cut off in search results, impacting visibility.

    How: Revise titles longer than 60 characters. For example, shorten the 'Administration of Justice Offences' title.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow page loading times and negatively affect user experience.

    How: Compress and optimize the large stylesheets mentioned (e.g., those over 500 KB). Consider using a CDN if applicable.

    Evidence: 802 KB of stylesheet, loaded by 232 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    232 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  6. 6

    Address Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages can hinder site navigation and SEO performance.

    How: Create internal links to 19 orphan pages to make them accessible. E.g., link to the 'Administrative vs. Criminal Penalties' page from relevant content.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks essential security headers, leaving it susceptible to interception and attacks such as clickjacking. An outdated JavaScript library could also pose risks. Immediate action is required to improve security and protect user data.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users may be intercepted on their first request if they attempt to access the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    No Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, the site is vulnerable to various attacks, including cross-site scripting (XSS).

    Fix: Implement a CSP header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of protection against clickjacking allows pages to be embedded in frames by other sites.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY or X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library DetectedMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 2.10.5 exposes the site to known vulnerabilities; risks depend on usage.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later to fix vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: A missing header allows browsers to interpret files in unintended ways, increasing the risk of execution of malicious scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    No Referrer Policy HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without a referrer policy, sensitive information could be leaked through the referrer header.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  7. 7

    Missing Permissions Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: Absence of this header allows unnecessary access to features like camera and microphone for scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=().

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/reviews/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/our-firm/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/in-the-community/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/careers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/michael-oykhman/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ian-savage/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/joseph-beller/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shaun-leochko/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shervin-sabet/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/cara-lebenzon/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 444 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/reviews/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/our-firm/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/in-the-community/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/careers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/michael-oykhman/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ian-savage/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/joseph-beller/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shaun-leochko/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shervin-sabet/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/cara-lebenzon/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/reviews/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/our-firm/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/in-the-community/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/careers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/michael-oykhman/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ian-savage/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/joseph-beller/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shaun-leochko/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shervin-sabet/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/cara-lebenzon/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/reviews/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/our-firm/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/in-the-community/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/careers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/michael-oykhman/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ian-savage/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/joseph-beller/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shaun-leochko/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shervin-sabet/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/cara-lebenzon/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/reviews/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/our-firm/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/in-the-community/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/careers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/lawyers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/michael-oykhman/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ian-savage/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/joseph-beller/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shaun-leochko/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shervin-sabet/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/cara-lebenzon/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/reviews/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/our-firm/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/in-the-community/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/careers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/lawyers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/michael-oykhman/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/ian-savage/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/joseph-beller/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shaun-leochko/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/shervin-sabet/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/cara-lebenzon/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.10.5. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.10.5 in https://www.strategiccriminaldefence.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/pla…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (1326 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (511 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • analytics.ahrefs.com (40 script tags)
    • 471e3398d1e347219e0b7186b29f5cf2.js.ubembed.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (39 script tags)
7 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 444 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    39 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.strategiccriminaldefence.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.strategiccriminaldefence.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.strategiccriminaldefence.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.strategiccriminaldefence.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.
www.strategiccriminaldefence.com scan 2026-10-04-1457 | DIY SEO Hub