Scanned sites / www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com / 2026-09-13-0542

www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com scan from 2026-09-13 05:42:29 UTC DR 3

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-0542

Scanned 2026-09-13 05:42:29 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 11:25:14 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

91/ 100Excellent

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 715 pages and 893 assets of www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com, starting from https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/. It scored 91 out of 100, an excellent result. 10 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (22), title tags (97), meta descriptions (108); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−1.4), meta descriptions (−1.2). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
715
Assets fetched
893
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

1,608 of 1,608 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 302 link destinations on other sites were checked, 404 left unchecked.

  • Title tags97 issues
    97 of 292 pages have title issues. 420 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.4 points
  • Meta descriptions108 issues
    108 of 292 pages have meta description issues. 420 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.2 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 292 pages have heading issues. 420 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links1 issue
    4 internal links point at 1 broken URL.
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 282 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 404 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.1 points
  • Redirects2 issues
    3 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    8 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 3 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability4 issues
    4 of 296 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 416 pages noindex by design.
    −0.1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 2396 image references have no alt attribute. 755 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets22 issues
    22 assets larger than 500 KB among 893 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage44 issues
    3 sitemaps listing 248 URLs: 44 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.4 points
  • Internal link counts443 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 443 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 292 pages have fewer than 200 words. 420 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format4 noted
    4 of 715 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals420 noted
    420 of 712 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives712 noted
    712 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text229 noted
    229 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure226 noted
    226 of 292 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 420 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length49 noted
    49 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 712 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 1608 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 712 pages; 677 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 61 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com scores 91%, higher than 87% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites91% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site is performing well but has some broken links and title/meta description issues that need immediate attention. Fixing these will enhance user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Reducing broken links improves user experience and keeps visitors on your site.

    How: Replace or remove internal links pointing to broken URLs or ensure they are restored.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Ensuring all pages return 2xx responses maintains site integrity and user trust.

    How: Check the listed URLs and correct any issues leading to 404 or 301 statuses.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Shorten Title Tags

    Why: Optimizing title length improves search visibility and click-through rates.

    How: Revise titles to be under 60 characters and keep essential keywords.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Fix Missing Meta Descriptions

    Why: Adding concise meta descriptions enhances click-through rates from search results.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for the pages that are currently missing them.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Heading Issues

    Why: Using proper heading tags helps search engines understand your content structure.

    How: Ensure only one H1 tag per page and optimize heading hierarchy.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Improve Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Ensuring all indexable pages are in the sitemap boosts discoverability and SEO.

    How: Update the sitemap to include the missing crawled pages.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

This review highlights several security weaknesses on your website, including missing headers that protect against various attacks. Implementing these headers and securing your API key will significantly enhance your site's security.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted when typing the URL without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    No Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows any scripts to load, risking XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add a header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: No protection against clickjacking attacks, allowing embedding of your site in frames.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Leaked Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: An exposed API key can be abused if not restricted properly.

    Fix: Restrict the API key to specific referrers in the Google Cloud console.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret files as scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/about-us/team/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/areas-we-serve/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/areas-we-serve/eagle/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/areas-we-serve/meridian-id/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/areas-we-serve/boise-id/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/areas-we-serve/nampa-id/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/about-us/events/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/about-us/gallery/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/about-us/faqs/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 712 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/about-us/team/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/areas-we-serve/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/areas-we-serve/eagle/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/areas-we-serve/meridian-id/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/areas-we-serve/boise-id/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/areas-we-serve/nampa-id/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/about-us/events/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/about-us/gallery/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/about-us/faqs/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/about-us/team/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/areas-we-serve/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/areas-we-serve/eagle/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/areas-we-serve/meridian-id/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/areas-we-serve/boise-id/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/areas-we-serve/nampa-id/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/about-us/events/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/about-us/gallery/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/about-us/faqs/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/about-us/team/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/areas-we-serve/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/areas-we-serve/eagle/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/areas-we-serve/meridian-id/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/areas-we-serve/boise-id/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/areas-we-serve/nampa-id/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/about-us/events/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/about-us/gallery/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/about-us/faqs/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…1w (39 chars) in https://www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com/wp-content/plugins/slmp-geojuice/dist/js/…: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 5 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • static.addtoany.com (40 script tags)
    • cdn.jsdelivr.net (80 script tags)
    • knowledgetags.yextpages.net (40 script tags)
    • libs.sfs.io (40 script tags)
    • sites.yext.com (3 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 5 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /cgi-bin/
    • Disallow: /tmp/
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /pre-sfs-backup/
    • Disallow: /old-site-backup/
6 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 712 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    43 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.sixonesixvisioncenter.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.