Scanned sites / www.signsandstickers.co.uk / 2026-09-29-1908

www.signsandstickers.co.uk scan from 9/29/2026, 7:08:14 PM

Scan 2026-09-29-1908

Scanned 9/29/2026, 7:08:14 PM, finished 9/29/2026, 7:08:27 PM

Site: https://www.signsandstickers.co.uk/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

100/ 100Excellent

On September 29, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 1 page and 2 assets of www.signsandstickers.co.uk, starting from https://www.signsandstickers.co.uk/. It scored 100 out of 100, an excellent result. All 22 checks passed: nothing needs fixing. 3 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 1 check was not run because the crawl fetched nothing for it.

Security review: Medium4 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
1
Assets fetched
2
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
0 of 22
CoverageComplete crawl

3 of 3 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript.

  • Title tagsOK
    0 of 0 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Meta descriptionsOK
    0 of 0 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 0 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sitesNot checked
    Not checked: the crawl fetched nothing this check can look at.
  • RedirectsOK
    0 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responsesOK
    0 URLs did not return a 2xx response.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 0 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 0 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 2 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverageOK
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 1 page; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 0 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 1 page URL are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 1 page have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives1 noted
    1 page carries a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structureOK
    0 of 0 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2065 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.signsandstickers.co.uk scores 100%, higher than 97% of the 2065 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0521030%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 1 site28%: 0 sites29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 1 site36%: 2 sites37%: 2 sites38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 2 sites41%: 1 site42%: 0 sites43%: 0 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 4 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 3 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 7 sites55%: 7 sites56%: 5 sites57%: 11 sites58%: 15 sites59%: 7 sites60%: 11 sites61%: 9 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 18 sites64%: 18 sites65%: 37 sites66%: 25 sites67%: 39 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 28 sites70%: 36 sites71%: 61 sites72%: 64 sites73%: 59 sites74%: 60 sites75%: 76 sites76%: 76 sites77%: 83 sites78%: 94 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 103 sites81%: 101 sites82%: 98 sites83%: 88 sites84%: 93 sites85%: 69 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 68 sites88%: 65 sites89%: 48 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 41 sites92%: 23 sites93%: 20 sites94%: 14 sites95%: 7 sites96%: 4 sites97%: 10 sites98%: 2 sites99%: 1 site100%: 57 sites100% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis (rules v4). The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has a perfect health score. No heavy assets larger than 500 KB were found, indicating no immediate fixes are needed. Consider reviewing your sitemap for better indexing.

  1. 1

    Review Sitemap for Coverage

    Why: Improving sitemap coverage can enhance SEO performance.

    How: Ensure your sitemap contains all relevant URLs of your website to improve indexing.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  2. 2

    Enhance Asset Optimization

    Why: Reducing asset sizes can improve loading times and user experience.

    How: Audit your assets to ensure they're optimized for size without sacrificing quality.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security misconfigurations that could expose users to risks such as clickjacking, content injection, and cookie theft. Addressing these issues will enhance the overall security posture of the site.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HSTS HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, first-time visitors typing the site address without HTTPS could be intercepted.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of a CSP allows unrestricted loading of resources, increasing the risk of cross-site scripting.

    Fix: Implement a header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of X-Frame-Options can allow attackers to embed the page in a frame for malicious purposes.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Cookie Lacks Security FlagsMedium

    Why it matters: The cookie is vulnerable to theft and manipulation without Secure and HttpOnly flags.

    Fix: Set the cookie with flags: Secure; HttpOnly; SameSite=Lax

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  5. 5

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may execute files as scripts based on their contents.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Without a referrer policy, sensitive URL data is sent to third-party sites.

    Fix: Include the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  7. 7

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: The absence of this header does not limit browser features for potentially harmful scripts.

    Fix: Implement the header: Permissions-Policy: interest-cohort=()

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.signsandstickers.co.uk/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 1 HTML page send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.signsandstickers.co.uk/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.signsandstickers.co.uk/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.signsandstickers.co.uk/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.signsandstickers.co.uk/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.signsandstickers.co.uk/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    1 of 1 cookie are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • nevercache-b39818 (set by https://www.signsandstickers.co.uk/) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
7 checks passed, 2 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 1 crawled page were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    Scripts from 1 other domain all carry Subresource Integrity hashes.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.signsandstickers.co.uk

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.signsandstickers.co.uk from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.signsandstickers.co.uk?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.signsandstickers.co.uk. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.
www.signsandstickers.co.uk scan 2026-09-29-1908 | DIY SEO Hub