Scanned sites / www.seolium.com / 2026-11-02-0801
www.seolium.com scan from 2026-11-02 08:01:52 UTC DR 46
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Scan 2026-11-02-0801
Scanned 2026-11-02 08:01:52 UTC, finished 2026-11-02 17:35:33 UTC. Found on page 4 of brave web search results
Site: https://www.seolium.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On November 2, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 5000 pages and 1000 assets of www.seolium.com, starting from https://www.seolium.com/. It scored 64 out of 100, a result that needs work. 9 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by indexability (4,994), meta descriptions (4,628), headings (4,900); 12 checks passed. Most of the points went to indexability (−10), meta descriptions (−7.4), headings (−5.9). 12 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium4 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 5000
- Assets fetched
- 1000
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 9 of 33
6,000 of 6,000 discovered URLs were fetched, 566,739 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 115176 left unchecked.
- Title tags1,433 issues1433 of 4999 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.−2.9 points
- Meta descriptions4,628 issues4628 of 4999 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.−7.4 points
- Headings4,900 issues4900 of 4999 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.−5.9 points
- Broken linksOK0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
- Links to other sites5 issues5 destinations answered with an error, 53 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 115176 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
- RedirectsOK0 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
- Non-200 responses10 noted10 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability4,994 issues4994 of 5000 indexable pages have indexability warnings.−10 points
- Image alt text167,284 issues167284 of 205818 image references have no alt attribute. 28289 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.−4.9 points
- Heavy assets3 issues3 assets larger than 500 KB among 1000 fetched assets.−1.8 points
- Orphan pagesOK0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
- Sitemap coverage2,500 issuesNo sitemap found. Tried: https://www.seolium.com/sitemap.xml (404). Add one at /sitemap.xml or list it in robots.txt.−3 points
- Internal link counts489 notedInternal link counts for 500 pages; 489 worth a look.
- Thin content1 issue1 of 4999 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL format1 noted1 of 5000 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
- Canonicals1 noted1 of 5000 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives143 noted143 pages carry a robots directive; 4857 carry none.
- Anchor text95 noted95 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structure849 noted849 of 4999 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
- Image weight and alt length36 noted32 images over 100 KB; 4 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomaliesOKNo redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
- HTML and head validation1 noted1 of 5000 pages have HTML problems: 0 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
- hreflangOKNo page declares hreflang.
- Structured dataOK143 of 4999 indexable pages carry structured data: BreadcrumbList (143), ListItem (143), Organization (143), WebSite (143), WebPage (142). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
- Near duplicates990 noted990 pages in 95 groups read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
- Soft 404s1 noted1 page answer 200 but say they are not there.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positionsOK0 of 4999 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
- PaginationOKNo page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
- Headers and cookiesOK0 cookies set by the site; 10 response headers recorded across 6000 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 5000 pages; 4943 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed InsightsNot checkedNot checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
- Spelling54,411 noted54411 words an English dictionary does not know, on 4975 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
2620 sites, median 80%, average 78%
www.seolium.com scores 64%, higher than 9% of the 2620 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsYour site has critical SEO issues including missing H1 tags, title and meta description problems, and the lack of a sitemap. Addressing these will significantly improve your site's SEO health.
- 1
Fix Missing H1 Tags
Why: H1 tags improve user experience and SEO rankings.
How: Add an H1 tag to 4056 pages. Ensure it accurately describes the content.
Checks: headings
- 2
Create a Sitemap
Why: Sitemaps help search engines index your pages more effectively.
How: Generate a sitemap and place it at /sitemap.xml. List it in robots.txt.
Checks: sitemap-coverage
- 3
Fix Title Tag Issues
Why: Title tags increase click-through rates and enhance SEO.
How: Revise titles for the 1433 problematic pages to be concise and relevant.
Checks: titles
- 4
Fix Meta Description Issues
Why: Meta descriptions help with search visibility and encourage clicks.
How: Update meta descriptions on the 4628 pages to under 160 characters.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 5
Address Indexability Warnings
Why: Properly configured indexability ensures pages are crawled and indexed.
How: Fix the 'No lang attribute' issue on 4993 pages by adding the lang attribute.
Checks: indexability
- 6
Add Alt Text to Images
Why: Alt text improves accessibility and contributes to SEO.
How: Add descriptive alt attributes to 167284 images missing alt text.
Checks: images-alt
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThe site lacks critical security headers, which makes it vulnerable to various attacks, including clickjacking and cross-site scripting (XSS). Additionally, outdated JavaScript libraries may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. Implementing these security measures and updates will enhance overall protection.
- 0 high
- 4 medium
- 2 low
- 1 info
- 1
Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium
Why it matters: Without HSTS, a visitor can be intercepted on their first request if they omit https://.
Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security
- 2
Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium
Why it matters: No CSP header means browsers can load scripts and styles from any source, potentially allowing attacks.
Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 3
Missing X-Frame-Options for Clickjacking ProtectionMedium
Why it matters: Without this header, pages can be embedded in frames, allowing clickjacking attacks.
Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 4
Outdated JavaScript LibrariesMedium
Why it matters: Several libraries with known vulnerabilities are in use, which may lead to exploits.
Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least 3.5.0 and Bootstrap to 3.4.1.
Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries
- 5
Missing X-Content-Type-Options for MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow
Why it matters: This absence can lead to browsers executing files as scripts based on content instead of type.
Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
Evidence: MIME sniffing protection
- 6
Server Version DisclosureLow
Why it matters: Revealing server version helps attackers search for known vulnerabilities.
Fix: Consider changing server configuration to hide version details.
Evidence: Software version disclosure
- 7
Missing Permissions PolicyInfo
Why it matters: This limits what browser features are available, mitigating risk if scripts are injected.
Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=()
Evidence: Permissions policy
What the checks found
- FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.
- https://www.seolium.com/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.seolium.com/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.seolium.com/blog/best-131-seo-agencies-in-usa/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.seolium.com/cheapest-rank-tracker/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.seolium.com/we-are-a-google-rank-tracking-tool/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.seolium.com/blog/best-147-web-design-agencies-in-usa/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.seolium.com/seo-quora/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.seolium.com/seo-glossary/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.seolium.com/seo/how-to-optimize/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.seolium.com/seo-talent-quiz/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.seolium.com/interview-rand-fishkin/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.seolium.com/interview-bill-slawski/ → no strict-transport-security
- FoundContent Security PolicyMedium
None of the 5000 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.
- https://www.seolium.com/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/blog/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/blog/best-131-seo-agencies-in-usa/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/cheapest-rank-tracker/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/we-are-a-google-rank-tracking-tool/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/blog/best-147-web-design-agencies-in-usa/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/seo-quora/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/seo-glossary/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/seo/how-to-optimize/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/seo-talent-quiz/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/interview-rand-fishkin/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/interview-bill-slawski/ → no content-security-policy
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://www.seolium.com/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.seolium.com/blog/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.seolium.com/blog/best-131-seo-agencies-in-usa/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.seolium.com/cheapest-rank-tracker/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.seolium.com/we-are-a-google-rank-tracking-tool/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.seolium.com/blog/best-147-web-design-agencies-in-usa/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.seolium.com/seo-quora/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.seolium.com/seo-glossary/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.seolium.com/seo/how-to-optimize/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.seolium.com/seo-talent-quiz/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.seolium.com/interview-rand-fishkin/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.seolium.com/interview-bill-slawski/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow
No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.
- https://www.seolium.com/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.seolium.com/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.seolium.com/blog/best-131-seo-agencies-in-usa/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.seolium.com/cheapest-rank-tracker/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.seolium.com/we-are-a-google-rank-tracking-tool/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.seolium.com/blog/best-147-web-design-agencies-in-usa/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.seolium.com/seo-quora/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.seolium.com/seo-glossary/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.seolium.com/seo/how-to-optimize/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.seolium.com/seo-talent-quiz/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.seolium.com/interview-rand-fishkin/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.seolium.com/interview-bill-slawski/ → no x-content-type-options
- FoundPermissions policyInfo
No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.
- https://www.seolium.com/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/blog/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/blog/best-131-seo-agencies-in-usa/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/cheapest-rank-tracker/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/we-are-a-google-rank-tracking-tool/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/blog/best-147-web-design-agencies-in-usa/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/seo-quora/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/seo-glossary/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/seo/how-to-optimize/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/seo-talent-quiz/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/interview-rand-fishkin/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.seolium.com/interview-bill-slawski/ → no permissions-policy
- FoundSoftware version disclosureLow
Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.
- server: Apache/2.4.52 (Ubuntu) (6000 responses)
- FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium
5 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.10.2, jQuery 2.1.4, jQuery 2.2.4, jQuery 3.2.1, Bootstrap 3.3.7. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.
- jQuery 1.10.2 in https://www.seolium.com/js/jquery.js: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
- jQuery 2.1.4 in https://www.seolium.com/js/jquery-2.1.4.min.js: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
- jQuery 2.2.4 in https://code.jquery.com/jquery-2.2.4.min.js: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
- jQuery 3.2.1 in https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.2.1.min.js: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
- Bootstrap 3.3.7 in https://www.seolium.com/js/bootstrap.min.js: CVE-2016-10735, CVE-2018-14040, CVE-2018-14041, CVE-2018-14042, CVE-2019-8331 (XSS through data attributes in tooltip, popover, collapse and scrollspy); fixed in 3.4.1
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 9 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
- cdnjs.cloudflare.com (44 script tags)
- code.jquery.com (14 script tags)
- cdn.datatables.net (19 script tags)
- stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com (7 script tags)
- cdn.jsdelivr.net (7 script tags)
- oss.maxcdn.com (2 script tags)
- engine.seolium.com (1 script tag)
- ssl.gstatic.com (1 script tag)
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed, 1 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 5000 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKReferrer policy
A referrer policy is set through a <meta name="referrer"> tag.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
116 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- Not applicableCookie flags
The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near www.seolium.com
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- www.beyoutifulhotyoga.comDR 1765/100 · rank 2344 · 94 pages
- www.alpinaphotography.comDR 1265/100 · rank 2344 · 134 pages
- reginadowntown.caDR 3465/100 · rank 2344 · 430 pages
- picstory.caDR 764/100 · rank 2375 · 215 pages
- www.jazzercise.comDR 6764/100 · rank 2375 · 1,555 pages
- www.borhotlaw.comDR 064/100 · rank 2375 · 2 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.seolium.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own www.seolium.com?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.seolium.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.