Scanned sites / www.scr-mn.com / 2026-09-26-0600

www.scr-mn.com scan from 2026-09-26 06:00:01 UTC DR 24

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-26-0600

Scanned 2026-09-26 06:00:01 UTC, finished 2026-09-26 07:02:37 UTC. Found on page 3 of chatgpt for browser (api usage) results

Site: https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/history

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

77/ 100Good

On September 26, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 522 pages and 742 assets of www.scr-mn.com, starting from https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/history. It scored 77 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (388), meta descriptions (409), heavy assets (8); 5 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−7.9), meta descriptions (−6.6), heavy assets (−4.8). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: High1 high, 5 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
522
Assets fetched
742
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

1,264 of 1,264 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 91 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags388 issues
    388 of 427 pages have title issues. 66 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.9 points
  • Meta descriptions409 issues
    409 of 427 pages have meta description issues. 66 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.6 points
  • Headings61 issues
    61 of 427 pages have heading issues. 66 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.7 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites7 issues
    7 destinations answered with an error, 22 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 91 destinations checked.
    −0.6 points
  • Redirects29 issues
    29 redirecting URLs, 2 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses35 noted
    35 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 29 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability29 issues
    29 of 480 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 13 pages noindex by design. 1 noindex page is listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore it.
    −0.6 points
  • Image alt text553 issues
    553 of 4807 image references have no alt attribute. 625 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.7 points
  • Heavy assets8 issues
    8 assets larger than 500 KB among 742 fetched assets.
    −4.8 points
  • Orphan pages12 issues
    12 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage76 issues
    1 sitemap listing 353 URLs: 75 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.9 points
  • Internal link counts442 noted
    Internal link counts for 493 pages; 442 worth a look.
  • Thin content4 issues
    4 of 427 pages have fewer than 200 words. 66 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format366 noted
    366 of 522 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals63 noted
    63 of 493 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives89 noted
    89 pages carry a robots directive; 404 carry none.
  • Anchor text13 noted
    13 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure55 noted
    55 of 427 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 66 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length83 noted
    83 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies3 noted
    3 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 493 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookies1 noted
    1 cookie set by the site, 1 missing a protective flag; 7 response headers recorded across 1264 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 493 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 49 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2890 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.scr-mn.com scores 77%, higher than 35% of the 2890 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0761520%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 54 sites70%: 47 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 77 sites73%: 82 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 108 sites78%: 133 sites79%: 112 sites80%: 130 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 133 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 132 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 94 sites87%: 94 sites88%: 83 sites89%: 73 sites90%: 56 sites91%: 60 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 30 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 16 sites96%: 19 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 152 sites77% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has several SEO issues that need addressing, notably redirect chains, non-200 responses, and problems with title tags and meta descriptions. Prioritizing these will enhance your site's search performance significantly.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirect Chains

    Why: Redundant redirects can confuse search engines, affecting SEO.

    How: Consolidate multiple 301 redirects into a single redirect where possible.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: URLs returning errors can harm user experience and SEO rankings.

    How: Identify issues with the 35 non-200 responses and correct links or ensure proper redirects.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Improving title tags can enhance click-through rates and search visibility.

    How: Revise titles longer than 60 characters to be concise and unique for each page.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Effective meta descriptions attract more clicks from search results.

    How: Revise meta descriptions longer than 160 characters to be succinct and focused.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Resolve Indexability Issues

    Why: Issues can prevent important pages from being indexed properly by search engines.

    How: Investigate the 28 indexable page warnings and resolve any canonical conflicts.

    Checks: indexability

  6. 6

    Add Alt Text for Images

    Why: Missing alt text negatively impacts accessibility and SEO.

    How: Add descriptive alt text to the 553 images missing it, improving context for search engines.

    Checks: images-alt

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security review of your website identified several crucial issues that need immediate attention, including non-HTTPS support, lack of HTTP Strict Transport Security, and missing content security policies. Addressing these findings will help protect user data and improve overall security posture.

  • 1 high
  • 5 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Insecure HTTP responseHigh

    Why it matters: One page responds over unencrypted HTTP, exposing it to interception.

    Fix: Redirect all HTTP requests to HTTPS to ensure secure communication.

    Evidence: HTTPS

  2. 2

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, initial visits over HTTP can be intercepted before switching to HTTPS.

    Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload' to the HTTP response headers.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  3. 3

    No Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows scripts and frames from any source, raising risk of attacks.

    Fix: Implement a suitable CSP header like 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';' to restrict resource loading.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  4. 4

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of this header allows clickjacking by embedding pages in iframes on malicious sites.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to prevent embedding.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  5. 5

    Lacking Cookie Protection FlagsMedium

    Why it matters: Cookies are vulnerable to theft and misuse without appropriate flags.

    Fix: Set cookies with flags 'Secure', 'HttpOnly', and 'SameSite=Strict'.

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  6. 6

    Vulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    Why it matters: Using outdated libraries can expose the site to known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Update jQuery to version 3.5.0 and jQuery UI to version 1.13.2.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  7. 7

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may misinterpret content types, risking security.

    Fix: Include 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' in HTTP response headers.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  8. 8

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: No referrer policy can leak sensitive URL information when users navigate to other sites.

    Fix: Set 'Referrer-Policy: no-referrer' or similar to control referrer behavior.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTPSHigh

    1 page answered 200 over plain HTTP with no redirect to HTTPS, while 492 were served over HTTPS. Anyone on the network path can read or alter these pages.

    • http://www.scr-mn.com/blog/ → 200 over http
  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/history → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/careers → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/scholarships → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/our-people → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/albert-lea-mn → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/albertville-mn → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/alborn-mn → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/alden-mn → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/alexandria-mn → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 493 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/history → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/careers → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/scholarships → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/our-people → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/albert-lea-mn → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/albertville-mn → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/alborn-mn → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/alden-mn → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/alexandria-mn → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/history → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/careers → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/scholarships → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/our-people → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/albert-lea-mn → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/albertville-mn → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/alborn-mn → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/alden-mn → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/alexandria-mn → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/history → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/careers → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/scholarships → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/our-people → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/albert-lea-mn → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/albertville-mn → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/alborn-mn → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/alden-mn → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/alexandria-mn → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/history → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/careers → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/scholarships → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/our-people → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/albert-lea-mn → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/albertville-mn → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/alborn-mn → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/alden-mn → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/alexandria-mn → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/history → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/careers → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/scholarships → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/our-people → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/albert-lea-mn → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/albertville-mn → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/alborn-mn → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/alden-mn → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/service_area/alexandria-mn → no permissions-policy
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    1 of 1 cookie are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • CONCRETE5 (set by https://www.scr-mn.com/about-us/history) lacks Secure, SameSite
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    2 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.11.3, jQuery UI 1.13.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.11.3 in https://www.scr-mn.com/concrete/js/jquery.js: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
    • jQuery UI 1.13.1 in https://www.scr-mn.com/blog/wp-includes/js/jquery/ui/core.min.js?ver=1.13.1: CVE-2022-31160 (checkboxradio XSS); fixed in 1.13.2
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (80 script tags)
    • cdnjs.cloudflare.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /application/config
5 checks passed
  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    80 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.scr-mn.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.scr-mn.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.scr-mn.com?