Scanned sites / www.riverslandscapingmt.com / 2026-09-13-0347

www.riverslandscapingmt.com scan from 2026-09-13 03:47:20 UTC DR 12

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.riverslandscapingmt.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-0347

Scanned 2026-09-13 03:47:20 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 04:02:51 UTC. Found on page 1 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

78/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 21 pages and 270 assets of www.riverslandscapingmt.com, starting from https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/. It scored 78 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (10), sitemap coverage (9), title tags (5); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−5), sitemap coverage (−3.4), title tags (−3.1). 5 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
21
Assets fetched
270
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

291 of 291 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 16 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags5 issues
    5 of 12 pages have title issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.1 points
  • Meta descriptions10 issues
    10 of 12 pages have meta description issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5 points
  • Headings4 issues
    4 of 12 pages have heading issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.5 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 13 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 14 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects5 issues
    6 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −1.3 points
  • Non-200 responses9 noted
    9 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 5 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability4 issues
    4 of 16 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −2.5 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 107 image references have no alt attribute. 25 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets4 issues
    4 assets larger than 500 KB among 270 fetched assets.
    −2.4 points
  • Orphan pages9 issues
    9 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −2.3 points
  • Sitemap coverage9 issues
    2 sitemaps listing 16 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 9 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3.4 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 16 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 12 pages have fewer than 200 words. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.5 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 21 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals4 noted
    4 of 16 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives16 noted
    16 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text4 noted
    4 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structureOK
    0 of 12 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length5 noted
    0 images over 100 KB; 5 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 16 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 291 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 16 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2333 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.riverslandscapingmt.com scores 78%, higher than 42% of the 2333 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 109 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites78% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has a healthy score, but some critical issues need addressing. Focus on improving titles, meta descriptions, and headings for better SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix non-200 responses

    Why: These URLs can affect user experience and indexing.

    How: Redirect or correct the pages to return a 2xx response.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Enhance title tags

    Why: Short titles may limit visibility in search results.

    How: Rewrite titles to be >30 characters, ensuring they are descriptive.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Add meta descriptions

    Why: Missing descriptions can lower click-through rates.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions (150-160 characters) for affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Correct heading issues

    Why: Missing H1s can confuse search engines about page content.

    How: Add a clear H1 tag to each page that lacks it.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Improve indexability

    Why: Canonical issues can hinder search engine indexing.

    How: Make sure canonical tags point to the correct versions of content.

    Checks: indexability

  6. 6

    Link orphan pages internally

    Why: Orphan pages are not discoverable by users or search engines.

    How: Add internal links from relevant pages pointing to orphan pages.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks key security headers that protect against various types of attacks, such as man-in-the-middle and clickjacking. Implementing these headers will enhance security for users visiting the site.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of HSTS allows interception on the first request when accessing the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains' to all HTTP responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: No CSP means scripts can load from any source, increasing risk of attacks like XSS.

    Fix: Implement a CSP header, e.g., 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' c0.wp.com www.googletagmanager.com stats.wp.com www.google.com'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, the site can be embedded in frames, which opens it to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' or 'X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN' to all HTTP responses.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this, browsers might misinterpret files' types and execute them maliciously.

    Fix: Include 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' in all HTTP responses.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Relying on third-party scripts without integrity checks poses a risk if these sources are compromised.

    Fix: Consider implementing Subresource Integrity (SRI) for scripts or using a strict CSP that controls these sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/meet-the-team/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/bozeman-water-restrictions/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/projects/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/old-services/design-planning/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/services-2026/commercial-maintenance/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/services-2026/snow-removal/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/services-2026/outdoor-living/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/services-2026/top-soil/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 16 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/meet-the-team/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/bozeman-water-restrictions/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/projects/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/contact-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/old-services/design-planning/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/services-2026/commercial-maintenance/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/services-2026/snow-removal/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/services-2026/outdoor-living/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/services-2026/top-soil/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/meet-the-team/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/bozeman-water-restrictions/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/projects/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/contact-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/old-services/design-planning/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/services-2026/commercial-maintenance/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/services-2026/snow-removal/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/services-2026/outdoor-living/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/services-2026/top-soil/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/meet-the-team/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/bozeman-water-restrictions/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/projects/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/contact-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/old-services/design-planning/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/services-2026/commercial-maintenance/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/services-2026/snow-removal/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/services-2026/outdoor-living/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.riverslandscapingmt.com/services-2026/top-soil/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • c0.wp.com (95 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (16 script tags)
    • stats.wp.com (16 script tags)
    • www.google.com (3 script tags)
7 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 16 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    4 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.riverslandscapingmt.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.riverslandscapingmt.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.riverslandscapingmt.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.riverslandscapingmt.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.