Scanned sites / www.rivercityeyecare.ca / 2026-11-03-1400

www.rivercityeyecare.ca scan from 2026-11-03 14:00:25 UTC DR 0

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-03-1400

Scanned 2026-11-03 14:00:25 UTC, finished 2026-11-03 14:51:11 UTC. Found on page 3 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

81/ 100Good

On November 3, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 156 pages and 368 assets of www.rivercityeyecare.ca, starting from https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/. It scored 81 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (106), title tags (68), heavy assets (8); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−5.9), title tags (−4.8), heavy assets (−4.8). 14 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
156
Assets fetched
368
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

524 of 524 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 95 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags68 issues
    68 of 129 pages have title issues. 14 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.8 points
  • Meta descriptions106 issues
    106 of 129 pages have meta description issues. 14 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.9 points
  • Headings6 issues
    6 of 129 pages have heading issues. 14 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.3 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites4 issues
    4 destinations answered with an error, 31 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 95 destinations checked.
    −1.1 points
  • Redirects13 issues
    14 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses19 noted
    19 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 13 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 130 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 13 pages noindex by design.
    −0.1 points
  • Image alt text2 issues
    2 of 65 image references have no alt attribute.
    −0.2 points
  • Heavy assets8 issues
    8 assets larger than 500 KB among 368 fetched assets.
    −4.8 points
  • Orphan pages5 issues
    5 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage32 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 103 URLs: 27 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 5 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.3 points
  • Internal link counts57 noted
    Internal link counts for 143 pages; 57 worth a look.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 129 pages have fewer than 200 words. 14 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format10 noted
    10 of 156 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals14 noted
    14 of 143 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives143 noted
    143 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structure46 noted
    46 of 129 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 14 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length2 noted
    2 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validation1 noted
    1 of 143 pages have HTML problems: 1 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    134 of 129 indexable pages carry structured data: BreadcrumbList (134), ListItem (134), WebSite (134), Organization (134), ImageObject (114). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicates41 noted
    41 pages in 16 groups read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 143 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions13 noted
    13 of 124 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination2 noted
    37 pages in pagination sequences; 2 with problems.
  • Headers and cookies1 noted
    1 cookie set by the site, 1 missing a protective flag; 15 response headers recorded across 524 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 143 pages; 71 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling28 noted
    28 words an English dictionary does not know, on 61 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2771 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.rivercityeyecare.ca scores 81%, higher than 53% of the 2771 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0651290%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 10 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 16 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 42 sites67%: 41 sites68%: 39 sites69%: 51 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 78 sites72%: 74 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 79 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 96 sites77%: 107 sites78%: 125 sites79%: 109 sites80%: 123 sites81%: 121 sites82%: 128 sites83%: 118 sites84%: 129 sites85%: 103 sites86%: 93 sites87%: 92 sites88%: 78 sites89%: 74 sites90%: 54 sites91%: 56 sites92%: 41 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 24 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 116 sites81% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your website has good health, but several key issues need attention for SEO improvement. Focus on fixing title and meta description issues, as well as addressing redirects and orphan pages. Significant asset optimizations are also recommended.

  1. 1

    Fix Title Tag Issues

    Why: 68 pages have title issues affecting SEO.

    How: Revise titles to meet best practices (ideally under 60 characters).

    Evidence: 85.5 KB of script, loaded by 142 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    142 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: titles

  2. 2

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 106 pages need meta descriptions, affecting click-through rates.

    How: Write unique meta descriptions for all affected pages, ideally 150-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Address Redirects

    Why: 14 redirects may cause slow page loads.

    How: Update internal links to avoid redirects, linking directly to final URLs.

    Checks: redirects

  4. 4

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: 5 orphan pages lack internal links, reducing visibility.

    How: Add links to these pages from relevant content throughout the site.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  5. 5

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: 8 assets are larger than 500 KB, slowing down the site.

    How: Compress or defer loading of large assets to improve site speed.

    Evidence: 454 KB of stylesheet, loaded by 134 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    134 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

This security review identifies several header protections missing from your website, which could lead to vulnerabilities. Implementing these recommendations will enhance the security of your site and help protect your visitors.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HSTS HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without HTTP Strict Transport Security, visitors typing your address without HTTPS could be at risk of interception.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, your pages can be embedded by malicious sites, leading to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY or use a CSP frame-ancestors directive.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Cookie Lacks Security FlagsMedium

    Why it matters: The absence of HttpOnly, Secure, and SameSite flags makes your cookies vulnerable to being exploited by attackers.

    Fix: Set the cookie with the flags: HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite=Strict

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Lack of this header can allow browsers to incorrectly interpret files as scripts, posing a security risk.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Missing Referrer-Policy HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without a Referrer-Policy, sensitive information can be sent to external sites when users navigate away.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  6. 6

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: Absence of this header means your site could be vulnerable to malicious scripts accessing browser features.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: interest-cohort=() (or specify features to disable)

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/faq/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/comprehensiveeyeexams/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/pediatric-eye-exams/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/contact-lens-exam-fittings/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/specialty-contact-lenses/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/diabetic-eye-exams/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/dry-eye-therapy/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/drivers-licence-eye-test/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/emergency-eye-exams/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    9 of 143 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/faq/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/comprehensiveeyeexams/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/pediatric-eye-exams/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/contact-lens-exam-fittings/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/specialty-contact-lenses/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/diabetic-eye-exams/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/dry-eye-therapy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/drivers-licence-eye-test/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/emergency-eye-exams/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/faq/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/comprehensiveeyeexams/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/pediatric-eye-exams/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/contact-lens-exam-fittings/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/specialty-contact-lenses/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/diabetic-eye-exams/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/dry-eye-therapy/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/drivers-licence-eye-test/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/emergency-eye-exams/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    9 of 143 HTML pages send referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/about-us/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/faq/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/services/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/comprehensiveeyeexams/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/pediatric-eye-exams/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/contact-lens-exam-fittings/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/specialty-contact-lenses/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/diabetic-eye-exams/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/dry-eye-therapy/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/drivers-licence-eye-test/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/emergency-eye-exams/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/about-us/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/faq/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/services/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/comprehensiveeyeexams/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/pediatric-eye-exams/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/contact-lens-exam-fittings/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/specialty-contact-lenses/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/diabetic-eye-exams/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/dry-eye-therapy/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/drivers-licence-eye-test/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/service/emergency-eye-exams/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    1 of 1 cookie are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • wordpress_test_cookie (set by https://www.rivercityeyecare.ca/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rive…) lacks SameSite
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (40 script tags)
9 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 143 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 9 of 143 pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    19 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.rivercityeyecare.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.rivercityeyecare.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.rivercityeyecare.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.rivercityeyecare.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.