Scanned sites / www.reesroofs.com

SEO report for www.reesroofs.com DR 5

The latest Site Spider scan of www.reesroofs.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/www-reesroofs-com/2026-11-03-1656.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-11-03 16:56:49 UTC, finished 2026-11-03 17:36:15 UTC. Found on page 1 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.reesroofs.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

92/ 100Excellent

On November 3, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 19 pages and 167 assets of www.reesroofs.com, starting from https://www.reesroofs.com/. It scored 92 out of 100, an excellent result. 5 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (15), heavy assets (1), sitemap coverage (1); 20 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.7), heavy assets (−0.6), sitemap coverage (−0.3). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 4 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
19
Assets fetched
167
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
5 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

186 of 186 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 8 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tagsOK
    0 of 18 pages have title issues.
  • Meta descriptions15 issues
    15 of 18 pages have meta description issues.
    −6.7 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 18 pages have heading issues.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites3 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 3 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 8 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 issue
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses2 noted
    2 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 18 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 15 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 167 fetched assets.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.2 points
  • Sitemap coverage1 issue
    2 sitemaps listing 18 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.3 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 18 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 18 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 19 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 18 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives18 noted
    18 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structureOK
    0 of 18 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length4 noted
    4 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 18 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    18 of 18 indexable pages carry structured data: BreadcrumbList (18), ListItem (18), WebSite (18), Organization (18), WebPage (18). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 18 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 18 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions2 noted
    2 of 17 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 186 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 18 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling34 noted
    34 words an English dictionary does not know, on 11 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2847 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.reesroofs.com scores 92%, higher than 90% of the 2847 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0741470%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 42 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 79 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 108 sites78%: 130 sites79%: 112 sites80%: 125 sites81%: 123 sites82%: 133 sites83%: 120 sites84%: 129 sites85%: 107 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 95 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 74 sites90%: 54 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 42 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 147 sites92% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The website has some areas for improvement, particularly related to meta descriptions and asset optimization. Addressing these issues will enhance SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Meta Descriptions

    Why: 15 of 18 pages have meta description issues, impacting visibility in search results.

    How: Rewrite or add meta descriptions for pages with problems to maintain under 160 characters.

    Evidence: One page has no meta description at all.

    1 page affected

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  2. 2

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: One image exceeds 500 KB; reducing its size can improve loading times and performance.

    How: Compress or resize the large asset found to reduce its file size without losing quality.

    Evidence: 131 KB of image, loaded by 2 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    2 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  3. 3

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: Two URLs are redirecting; cleaning up these redirects can streamline site access and improve user experience.

    How: Update links to point directly to the final URLs or remove unnecessary redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  4. 4

    Link to Orphan Page

    Why: The Privacy Policy page is not linked internally, making it hard to discover.

    How: Add internal links to the Privacy Policy page from relevant areas within your site.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security vulnerabilities due to missing important HTTP security headers, exposing it to potential attacks such as man-in-the-middle and clickjacking. Implementing recommended security headers will enhance the site's protection significantly.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 4 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted on initial connections without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains' to your HTTP response headers.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of a CSP allows loading scripts or resources from any source, increasing risk of XSS.

    Fix: Include 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';' in your HTTP headers.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing Clickjacking Protection (X-Frame-Options)Medium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, the site can be embedded in frames, exposing users to clickjacking.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to your HTTP response headers.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing MIME Sniffing Protection (X-Content-Type-Options)Low

    Why it matters: Without this, the browser may execute files as scripts based on content, not type.

    Fix: Include 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' in your HTTP headers.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Without a referrer policy, sensitive URL information may be leaked to other sites.

    Fix: Add 'Referrer-Policy: no-referrer' to your HTTP response headers.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  6. 6

    Software Version Disclosure in Server BannerLow

    Why it matters: Exposing server versions allows attackers to exploit known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Configure your server to hide the software version details in the response headers.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  7. 7

    Third-Party Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Without Subresource Integrity (SRI), injected scripts from trusted sources can lead to compromises.

    Fix: Implement a CSP specifying valid sources for scripts or use SRI attributes for third-party script tags.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  8. 8

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: A permissions policy can deactivate unused browser features, which limits attack surfaces.

    Fix: Include 'Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(), camera=(), microphone=()' in your HTTP headers.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.reesroofs.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/commercial-roofing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/new-construction/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/roof-recovers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/roof-repair-replacement-installation/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/gutters-downspouts/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/leak-chasing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/solar-roofing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/shingle-roofing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/metal-roofing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/vinyl-decking/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/preventative-maintenance-programs/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 18 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.reesroofs.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/commercial-roofing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/new-construction/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/roof-recovers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/roof-repair-replacement-installation/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/gutters-downspouts/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/leak-chasing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/solar-roofing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/shingle-roofing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/metal-roofing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/vinyl-decking/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/preventative-maintenance-programs/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.reesroofs.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/commercial-roofing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/new-construction/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/roof-recovers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/roof-repair-replacement-installation/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/gutters-downspouts/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/leak-chasing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/solar-roofing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/shingle-roofing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/metal-roofing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/vinyl-decking/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/preventative-maintenance-programs/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.reesroofs.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/commercial-roofing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/new-construction/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/roof-recovers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/roof-repair-replacement-installation/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/gutters-downspouts/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/leak-chasing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/solar-roofing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/shingle-roofing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/metal-roofing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/vinyl-decking/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/preventative-maintenance-programs/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.reesroofs.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/commercial-roofing/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/new-construction/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/roof-recovers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/roof-repair-replacement-installation/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/gutters-downspouts/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/leak-chasing/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/solar-roofing/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/shingle-roofing/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/metal-roofing/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/vinyl-decking/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/preventative-maintenance-programs/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.reesroofs.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/commercial-roofing/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/new-construction/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/roof-recovers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/roof-repair-replacement-installation/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/gutters-downspouts/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/leak-chasing/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/solar-roofing/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/shingle-roofing/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/metal-roofing/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/vinyl-decking/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.reesroofs.com/preventative-maintenance-programs/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: Apache (123 responses)
    • server: nginx/1.29.8 (63 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (18 script tags)
    • cdn.callrail.com (18 script tags)
    • sellwithchat.com (18 script tags)
7 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 18 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    19 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of www.reesroofs.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near www.reesroofs.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.reesroofs.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.reesroofs.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.reesroofs.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.