Scanned sites / www.projectlandscape.ca / 2026-09-12-1112
www.projectlandscape.ca scan from 2026-09-12 11:12:03 UTC DR 37
A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.projectlandscape.ca.
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Scan 2026-09-12-1112
Scanned 2026-09-12 11:12:03 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 15:56:12 UTC
Site: https://www.projectlandscape.ca/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 266 pages and 1074 assets of www.projectlandscape.ca, starting from https://www.projectlandscape.ca/. It scored 81 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (15), sitemap coverage (222), title tags (90); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), sitemap coverage (−5.6), title tags (−3.8). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium1 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 266
- Assets fetched
- 1074
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 8 of 27
1,340 of 1,341 discovered URLs were fetched, 2,294 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 118 link destinations on other sites were checked.
- Title tags90 issues90 of 222 pages have title issues. 15 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−3.8 points
- Meta descriptions38 issues38 of 222 pages have meta description issues. 15 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−1.3 points
- Headings14 issues14 of 222 pages have heading issues. 15 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−0.4 points
- Broken linksOK0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
- Links to other sites9 issues9 destinations answered with an error, 29 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 118 destinations checked.−1.5 points
- Redirects29 issues30 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.−0.5 points
- Non-200 responses30 noted30 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 29 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability5 issues5 of 226 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 11 pages noindex by design.−0.2 points
- Image alt textOK0 of 438 image references have no alt attribute.
- Heavy assets15 issues15 assets larger than 500 KB among 1074 fetched assets.−6 points
- Orphan pagesOK0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
- Sitemap coverage222 issues1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 222 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.−5.6 points
- Internal link counts92 notedInternal link counts for 237 pages; 92 worth a look.
- Thin contentOK0 of 222 pages have fewer than 200 words. 15 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL formatOKAll 266 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
- Canonicals15 noted15 of 237 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives237 noted237 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
- Anchor text17 noted17 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structure32 noted32 of 222 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 15 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Image weight and alt length23 noted23 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomalies5 noted5 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
- HTML and head validationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- hreflangNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Structured dataNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Near duplicatesNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Soft 404sOKNone of 237 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positionsNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
- PaginationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Headers and cookiesOK0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 1340 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 237 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed Insights5 notedMobile performance 71 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
- SpellingNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
2332 sites, median 79%, average 78%
www.projectlandscape.ca scores 81%, higher than 55% of the 2332 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsWritten from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.
Your site has some SEO issues that need addressing. Focus on correcting URL redirects, title tags, meta descriptions, headings, indexability issues, and updating your sitemap for better visibility in search engines.
- 1
Fix Redirects
Why: Redirects can confuse search engines and users, hurting SEO.
How: Update or remove unnecessary redirects to ensure URLs return a 200 status.
Checks: redirects, status-codes
- 2
Optimize Title Tags
Why: Long title tags can have negative impacts on SERP rankings.
How: Shorten title tags to under 60 characters each. Ensure they are unique.
Checks: titles
- 3
Improve Meta Descriptions
Why: Duplicate meta descriptions can hinder click-through rates.
How: Create unique meta descriptions for affected pages with under 160 characters.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 4
Add Missing Headings
Why: Missing H1 tags can negatively affect page relevance.
How: Add clear H1 headings to pages lacking them.
Checks: headings
- 5
Resolve Indexability Issues
Why: Canonical tags pointing to the same page can confuse search engines.
How: Review and adjust canonical tags to ensure correct indexing.
Checks: indexability
- 6
Update Sitemap Coverage
Why: An accurate sitemap enhances site indexing by search engines.
How: Include all crawled pages in your XML sitemap and resubmit it.
Checks: sitemap-coverage
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThe website lacks a Content-Security-Policy (CSP) header, leaving it vulnerable to malicious code injections from third-party scripts. Additionally, sensitive paths in robots.txt may expose private areas. These issues should be addressed to enhance security.
- 0 high
- 1 medium
- 1 low
- 1 info
- 1
Missing Content Security PolicyMedium
Why it matters: Without a CSP, the site is vulnerable to script injections and resource loading from untrusted sources.
Fix: Implement a CSP by adding the header: `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';` to all HTML pages.
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 2
Third-party Scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow
Why it matters: Scripts running from www.googletagmanager.com lack Subresource Integrity, making them susceptible to tampering.
Fix: Consider implementing a CSP that incorporates valid sources, or switch to using Subresource Integrity with these scripts.
Evidence: Third-party scripts
- 3
Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo
Why it matters: Listing /wp-admin/ and /login/ publicly can lead to unauthorized access attempts by revealing potential attack vectors.
Fix: Restrict access to these paths with proper server access controls instead of relying solely on robots.txt.
Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt
What the checks found
- FoundContent Security PolicyMedium
None of the 237 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.
- https://www.projectlandscape.ca/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.projectlandscape.ca/contact/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.projectlandscape.ca/residential-services/hardscaping/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.projectlandscape.ca/residential-services/landscape-construction/patio-surfaces/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.projectlandscape.ca/paver-sealing-refresh-program/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.projectlandscape.ca/retaining-walls/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.projectlandscape.ca/residential-services/outdoor-living/garden-walls/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.projectlandscape.ca/residential-services/hardscaping/garden-bed-edging/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.projectlandscape.ca/concrete-curbing/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.projectlandscape.ca/staircases-stepping-stones/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.projectlandscape.ca/residential-services/landscape-construction/seating/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.projectlandscape.ca/residential-services/hardscaping/water-management/ → no content-security-policy
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 2 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
- Disallow: /login/
10 checks passed, 3 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 237 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKHTTP Strict Transport Security
strict-transport-security is set on all 237 HTML pages.
- OKClickjacking protection
x-frame-options is set on all 237 HTML pages.
- OKMIME sniffing protection
x-content-type-options is set on all 237 HTML pages.
- OKSoftware version disclosure
No Server or X-Powered-By header is sent.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
42 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries
2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- Not applicableReferrer policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicablePermissions policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicableCookie flags
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near www.projectlandscape.ca
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- www.spokaneelite.comDR 281/100 · rank 943 · 26 pages
- www.saskatoonphysiotherapy.comDR 581/100 · rank 943 · 6 pages
- www.calgarylaw.comDR 1281/100 · rank 943 · 65 pages
- tatumwysocki.comDR 981/100 · rank 943 · 71 pages
- inmotionmedia.caDR 3281/100 · rank 943 · 42 pages
- innovationrenovation.caDR 281/100 · rank 943 · 13 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.projectlandscape.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own www.projectlandscape.ca?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.projectlandscape.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.