Scanned sites / www.physio.family / 2026-09-12-0737

www.physio.family scan from 2026-09-12 07:37:22 UTC DR 17

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.physio.family.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-0737

Scanned 2026-09-12 07:37:22 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 11:23:08 UTC

Site: https://www.physio.family/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

91/ 100Excellent

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 168 pages and 536 assets of www.physio.family, starting from https://www.physio.family/. It scored 91 out of 100, an excellent result. 8 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (47), sitemap coverage (58), orphan pages (51); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−2.7), sitemap coverage (−2.5), orphan pages (−1.4). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
168
Assets fetched
536
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

704 of 764 discovered URLs were fetched, 60 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 150 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags7 issues
    7 of 139 pages have title issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.5 points
  • Meta descriptions47 issues
    47 of 139 pages have meta description issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.7 points
  • Headings15 issues
    15 of 139 pages have heading issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.6 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites2,033 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 70 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 149 destinations checked.
  • Redirects26 issues
    28 redirecting URLs, 2 of them chained.
    −0.7 points
  • Non-200 responses28 noted
    28 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 27 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 140 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
    −0.1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 137 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 536 fetched assets.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pages51 issues
    51 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage58 issues
    4 sitemaps listing 140 URLs: 3 crawled pages missing, 3 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 52 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.5 points
  • Internal link counts4 noted
    Internal link counts for 141 pages; 4 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 139 pages have fewer than 200 words. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 168 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 141 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives141 noted
    141 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text4 noted
    4 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure23 noted
    23 of 139 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length21 noted
    11 images over 100 KB; 10 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 141 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 704 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 141 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2328 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.physio.family scores 91%, higher than 90% of the 2328 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 73 sites76%: 85 sites77%: 93 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 63 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites91% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The crawl revealed multiple SEO issues including redirects, non-200 responses, title and meta description problems, heading issues, orphan pages, and sitemap coverage errors. Addressing these will enhance user experience and site performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects and Non-200 Responses

    Why: Eliminating unnecessary redirects improves site speed and reduces user frustration.

    How: Update or remove the 28 URLs with redirects (especially the 2 chained ones) to point directly to the final destination.

    Checks: redirects, status-codes

  2. 2

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Improving title tags will enhance click-through rates and search visibility.

    How: Revise 7 titles to be concise (ideally <60 characters) while retaining key information.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Revise Meta Descriptions

    Why: Optimized descriptions can improve search engine visibility and enhance user engagement.

    How: Edit 14 meta descriptions to be under 160 characters and provide a compelling summary of each page.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Correct Heading Structure

    Why: Proper heading structure aids both SEO and accessibility.

    How: Ensure each page has one H1 tag and utilize H2 or H3 tags for subheadings where necessary on 15 pages.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Address Orphan Pages

    Why: Improving internal linking helps with user navigation and SEO authority distribution.

    How: Link the 51 orphan pages within relevant content or menus to improve their visibility.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Update Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Ensuring all relevant pages are listed in the sitemap helps search engines discover them.

    How: Remove broken or redirecting URLs, incorporate missing pages, and update the sitemap accordingly.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has significant security issues, including the absence of a Content Security Policy and vulnerabilities in a JavaScript library. Addressing these will enhance protection against potential attacks.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of a Content Security Policy allows unrestricted loading of resources, increasing risk of cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.

    Fix: Implement a CSP using the header `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';` to restrict resource loading.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Vulnerable JavaScript LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery 1.9.1 is vulnerable to multiple security issues, including XSS attacks, potentially affecting site integrity.

    Fix: Upgrade to jQuery version 3.5.0 or later to mitigate these vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  3. 3

    Third-Party Scripts without SRILow

    Why it matters: Running scripts from external domains without Subresource Integrity increases the risk of malicious code execution.

    Fix: Consider using Subresource Integrity for all external scripts or implementing a Content Security Policy that allows only trusted sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  4. 4

    Private Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Listing sensitive paths in robots.txt may reveal them to attackers, potentially leading to unauthorized access.

    Fix: Restrict access to admin and login paths through proper server-side authentication instead of relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 141 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.physio.family/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.physio.family/book-an-appointment/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.physio.family/about-family-physiotherapy-edmonton/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.physio.family/careers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.physio.family/team/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.physio.family/photos/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.physio.family/frequently-asked-questions-faqs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.physio.family/links/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.physio.family/our-services-physiotherapy-services-in-edmonton/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.physio.family/motor-vehicle-accident-physiotherapy-edmonton/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.physio.family/sports-physiotherapy-edmonton/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.physio.family/pre-surgical-physiotherapy-edmonton/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.9.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.9.1 in https://www.physio.family/wp-content/plugins/elementskit-lite/widgets/init/asse…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (39 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 3 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-includes/
    • Disallow: /wp-login.php
9 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 141 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 141 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 141 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 141 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    No Server or X-Powered-By header is sent.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.physio.family

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.physio.family from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.physio.family?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.physio.family. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.