Scanned sites / www.petalworksidaho.com / 2026-09-12-2001

www.petalworksidaho.com scan from 2026-09-12 20:01:58 UTC DR 9

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.petalworksidaho.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-2001

Scanned 2026-09-12 20:01:58 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 21:42:30 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.petalworksidaho.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

80/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 52 pages and 529 assets of www.petalworksidaho.com, starting from https://www.petalworksidaho.com/. It scored 80 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (41), meta descriptions (26), thin content (22); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.2), thin content (−3.5). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
52
Assets fetched
529
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

581 of 581 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 3 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags10 issues
    10 of 41 pages have title issues. 9 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2 points
  • Meta descriptions26 issues
    26 of 41 pages have meta description issues. 9 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.2 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 41 pages have heading issues. 9 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.4 points
  • Broken links1 issue
    32 internal links point at 1 broken URL.
    −0.4 points
  • Links to other sites100 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 2 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 3 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 noted
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses2 issues
    9 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 2 of them are pages, 2 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.4 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability7 issues
    7 of 48 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 2 pages noindex by design.
    −1.4 points
  • Image alt text2 issues
    2 of 235 image references have no alt attribute. 182 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.1 points
  • Heavy assets41 issues
    41 assets larger than 500 KB among 529 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages9 issues
    9 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.7 points
  • Sitemap coverage11 issues
    10 sitemaps listing 48 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 9 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.3 points
  • Internal link counts24 noted
    Internal link counts for 50 pages; 24 worth a look.
  • Thin content22 issues
    22 of 41 pages have fewer than 200 words. 9 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.5 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format3 noted
    3 of 52 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals9 noted
    9 of 50 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives50 noted
    50 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text18 noted
    18 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure26 noted
    26 of 41 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 9 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length75 noted
    75 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 50 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 581 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 50 pages; 26 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2333 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.petalworksidaho.com scores 80%, higher than 51% of the 2333 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites80% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has good health, but there are several issues to address for improved SEO. Focus on fixing broken links, non-200 responses, title tags, and meta descriptions for better search visibility and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 32 internal links point to a broken URL, harming user experience.

    How: Identify all broken links and update them to point to valid pages.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 9 URLs are returning errors, making them inaccessible to users and crawlers.

    How: Check each URL that doesn't return a 2xx response and either fix or redirect them appropriately.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 10 pages have title issues that can impact click-through rates.

    How: Revise titles to be under 60 characters for improved relevance and readability.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 26 pages lack effective meta descriptions, which can lower visibility in search results.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions under 155 characters for the identified pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Heading Issues

    Why: Missing H1 tags on 3 pages affects content structure and SEO.

    How: Add an appropriate H1 tag for each affected page, aligning with content.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Fix Sitemap Issues

    Why: Your sitemap has broken URLs and doesn't include all pages, impacting indexability.

    How: Update the sitemap to include all relevant URLs and ensure all links are valid.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security vulnerabilities that need immediate attention, including missing security headers and an outdated JavaScript library. Implementing these changes will help protect both your users and your site's integrity.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted by not using HTTPS.

    Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload' to HTTP response headers.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: No CSP means unrestricted loading of potentially malicious scripts.

    Fix: Add 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';' to HTTP response headers.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this, your site may be vulnerable to clickjacking.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to HTTP response headers.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable jQuery Library DetectedMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery version 1.11.3 poses security risks due to known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this, browsers may misinterpret files as scripts.

    Fix: Add 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to HTTP response headers.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/weddings-events/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/boise-floral-gallery/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/whats-a-floral-tattoo/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/stylized-photo-shoots-with-wedding-professionals/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/choosing-colors-for-wedding-flowers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/boise-florist-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/eagle-idaho-florists/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/meridian-idaho-florists/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 50 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/weddings-events/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/testimonials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/contact-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/boise-floral-gallery/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/whats-a-floral-tattoo/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/stylized-photo-shoots-with-wedding-professionals/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/choosing-colors-for-wedding-flowers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/boise-florist-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/eagle-idaho-florists/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/meridian-idaho-florists/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/weddings-events/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/testimonials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/contact-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/boise-floral-gallery/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/whats-a-floral-tattoo/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/stylized-photo-shoots-with-wedding-professionals/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/choosing-colors-for-wedding-flowers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/boise-florist-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/eagle-idaho-florists/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/meridian-idaho-florists/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/weddings-events/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/testimonials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/contact-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/boise-floral-gallery/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/whats-a-floral-tattoo/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/stylized-photo-shoots-with-wedding-professionals/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/choosing-colors-for-wedding-flowers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/boise-florist-services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/eagle-idaho-florists/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.petalworksidaho.com/meridian-idaho-florists/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.11.3. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.11.3 in https://www.petalworksidaho.com/wp-content/plugins/robo-gallery/js/robo_gallery…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdnjs.cloudflare.com (40 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • maps.googleapis.com (16 script tags)
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 50 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    7 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.petalworksidaho.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.petalworksidaho.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.petalworksidaho.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.petalworksidaho.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.