Scanned sites / www.massageexperts.ca / 2026-09-11-2041

www.massageexperts.ca scan from 2026-09-11 20:41:41 UTC DR 26

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.massageexperts.ca.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-11-2041

Scanned 2026-09-11 20:41:41 UTC, finished 2026-09-11 21:55:48 UTC

Site: https://www.massageexperts.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

77/ 100Good

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 644 pages and 1016 assets of www.massageexperts.ca, starting from https://www.massageexperts.ca/. It scored 77 out of 100, a good result. 13 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (582), heavy assets (40), sitemap coverage (609); 5 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.5), heavy assets (−6), sitemap coverage (−5.9). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
644
Assets fetched
1016
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 26
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,660 of 1,660 discovered URLs were fetched, 24,440 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 317 link destinations on other sites were checked, 57 left unchecked.

  • Title tags136 issues
    136 of 609 pages have title issues. 11 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.2 points
  • Meta descriptions582 issues
    582 of 609 pages have meta description issues. 11 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.5 points
  • Headings49 issues
    49 of 609 pages have heading issues. 11 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.5 points
  • Broken links6 issues
    124 internal links point at 6 broken URLs.
    −0.2 points
  • Links to other sites3 issues
    3 destinations answered with an error, 59 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 57 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.2 points
  • Redirects18 issues
    18 redirecting URLs, 2 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses7 issues
    25 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 24 of them are pages, 7 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability3 issues
    3 of 611 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 9 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 8087 image references have no alt attribute. 7047 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets40 issues
    40 assets larger than 500 KB among 1016 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages3 issues
    3 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage609 issues
    20 sitemaps listing 0 URLs: 609 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −5.9 points
  • Internal link counts51 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 51 worth a look.
  • Thin content2 issues
    2 of 609 pages have fewer than 200 words. 11 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content7 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format18 noted
    18 of 644 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals13 noted
    13 of 620 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives618 noted
    618 pages carry a robots directive; 2 carry none.
  • Anchor text24 noted
    24 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure478 noted
    478 of 609 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 11 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length161 noted
    161 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies4 noted
    4 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 620 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 1660 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 620 pages; 82 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2326 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.massageexperts.ca scores 77%, higher than 38% of the 2326 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 76 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 63 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 23 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites77% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks key security headers that protect against various attacks, including clickjacking and MIME sniffing, and is using an outdated version of jQuery with known vulnerabilities. Implementing necessary headers and updating libraries will significantly enhance overall security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: No CSP prevents the browser from limiting script and style sources, increasing XSS risks.

    Fix: Add `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';` in response headers.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of X-Frame-Options allows clickjacking attacks by embedding pages in frames.

    Fix: Add `X-Frame-Options: DENY` in response headers.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Using Vulnerable jQuery LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery 2.10.5 has known vulnerabilities that could be exploited depending on site usage.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later to mitigate vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  4. 4

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without X-Content-Type-Options, browsers might execute files incorrectly, leading to security risks.

    Fix: Add `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff` in response headers.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 620 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/fr/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/your-first-visit-massage/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/therapeutic-massage/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/deep-tissue-massage/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/hot-stone-massage/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/prenatal-massage/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/cf1-therapeutic-massage/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/couples-massage/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/cupping-therapy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/lymphatic-drainage/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/fr/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/your-first-visit-massage/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/therapeutic-massage/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/deep-tissue-massage/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/hot-stone-massage/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/prenatal-massage/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/cf1-therapeutic-massage/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/couples-massage/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/cupping-therapy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/lymphatic-drainage/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/fr/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/your-first-visit-massage/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/therapeutic-massage/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/deep-tissue-massage/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/hot-stone-massage/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/prenatal-massage/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/cf1-therapeutic-massage/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/couples-massage/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/cupping-therapy/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.massageexperts.ca/treatments/lymphatic-drainage/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.10.5. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.10.5 in https://www.massageexperts.ca/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.j…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
9 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 620 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 620 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    83 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.massageexperts.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.massageexperts.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.massageexperts.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.massageexperts.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.