Scanned sites / www.lelascoffee.com / 2026-09-13-0842

www.lelascoffee.com scan from 2026-09-13 08:42:27 UTC DR 0

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.lelascoffee.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-0842

Scanned 2026-09-13 08:42:27 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 10:20:16 UTC. Found on page 3 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.lelascoffee.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

85/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 27 pages and 281 assets of www.lelascoffee.com, starting from https://www.lelascoffee.com/. It scored 85 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (12), sitemap coverage (14), thin content (7); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−3.7), sitemap coverage (−3.2), thin content (−2.2). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
27
Assets fetched
281
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

308 of 309 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 2 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags1 issue
    1 of 12 pages have title issues. 14 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.4 points
  • Meta descriptions12 issues
    12 of 12 pages have meta description issues. 14 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.7 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 12 pages have heading issues. 14 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.7 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites52 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 2 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 2 destinations checked.
  • Redirects2 noted
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses2 noted
    2 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 23 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −0.8 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 90 image references have no alt attribute. 24 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 281 fetched assets.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pages12 issues
    12 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1.8 points
  • Sitemap coverage14 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 26 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 11 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3.2 points
  • Internal link counts2 noted
    Internal link counts for 26 pages; 2 worth a look.
  • Thin content7 issues
    7 of 12 pages have fewer than 200 words. 14 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.2 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format12 noted
    12 of 27 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals12 noted
    12 of 26 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives26 noted
    26 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structure2 noted
    2 of 12 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 14 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 26 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 308 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 26 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2337 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.lelascoffee.com scores 85%, higher than 73% of the 2337 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 87 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites85% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Several critical issues were found affecting your site's SEO, including redirects, non-200 responses, and meta description problems. Addressing these will improve visibility and performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can slow down site performance and confuse search engines.

    How: Update URLs to remove unnecessary redirects from https://www.lelascoffee.com/checkout/ and https://www.lelascoffee.com/sitemap.xml.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: URLs returning non-200 responses can lead to indexing issues.

    How: Ensure https://www.lelascoffee.com/checkout/ and https://www.lelascoffee.com/sitemap.xml return a 200 status code.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Correct Title Tag Issues

    Why: Title tags influence search engine ranking and click-through rates.

    How: Shorten the title on https://www.lelascoffee.com/shipping_returns/ to under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Fix Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions affect click rates from search results.

    How: Add concise meta descriptions for all pages, ensuring they are under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Heading Issues

    Why: Proper heading structures improve content readability and SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 tag only, such as on https://www.lelascoffee.com/ and https://www.lelascoffee.com/shop/.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Improve Content Length

    Why: Thin content can negatively impact search rankings.

    How: Increase word count on pages with fewer than 200 words, like https://www.lelascoffee.com/shipping_returns/.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has several security headers missing, which leaves it vulnerable to various attacks. Notably, lack of HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) can expose users to interception. Additionally, the absence of X-Content-Type-Options could allow misinterpretation of file types, and sensitive paths are revealed in the robots.txt.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors may be intercepted when accessing the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Implement the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Absent X-Content-Type-Options may allow browsers to execute files as scripts incorrectly.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  3. 3

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can be compromised, altering site behavior.

    Fix: Consider implementing Subresource Integrity (SRI) for scripts or apply a Content-Security-Policy restricting script sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  4. 4

    Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file exposes a path (/wp-admin/) that should be restricted.

    Fix: Ensure access controls are applied to sensitive directories instead of relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/shop/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/shipping_returns/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/cart/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/product/adorsi-yirgacheffe/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/product/ayla-bombe/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/product/bensa-bombe/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/product/ethiopica-blend/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/product/faysel-abdosh-sidama/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/product/lela-summer-blend/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/product/true-north-blend/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/product-category/coffee/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/shop/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/shipping_returns/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/cart/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/product/adorsi-yirgacheffe/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/product/ayla-bombe/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/product/bensa-bombe/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/product/ethiopica-blend/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/product/faysel-abdosh-sidama/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/product/lela-summer-blend/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/product/true-north-blend/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.lelascoffee.com/product-category/coffee/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (26 script tags)
    • www.google.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 26 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 26 pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 26 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    23 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.lelascoffee.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.lelascoffee.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.lelascoffee.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.lelascoffee.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.