Scanned sites / www.landscaping-regina.com / 2026-09-12-2341

www.landscaping-regina.com scan from 2026-09-12 23:41:59 UTC DR 6

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.landscaping-regina.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-2341

Scanned 2026-09-12 23:41:59 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 23:45:08 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.landscaping-regina.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

88/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 52 pages and 98 assets of www.landscaping-regina.com, starting from https://www.landscaping-regina.com/. It scored 88 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (45), sitemap coverage (10), title tags (6); 13 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.1), title tags (−1.2), sitemap coverage (−1.2). 6 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
52
Assets fetched
98
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

150 of 150 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 146 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags6 issues
    6 of 49 pages have title issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.2 points
  • Meta descriptions45 issues
    45 of 49 pages have meta description issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.1 points
  • Headings6 issues
    6 of 49 pages have heading issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.7 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 7 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 139 destinations checked.
    −0.8 points
  • Redirects1 issue
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses95 noted
    95 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 49 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 2 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 223 image references have no alt attribute. 1 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 98 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages10 issues
    10 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.8 points
  • Sitemap coverage10 issues
    3 sitemaps listing 49 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 10 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.2 points
  • Internal link counts3 noted
    Internal link counts for 51 pages; 3 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 49 pages have fewer than 200 words. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 52 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 51 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives51 noted
    51 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text8 noted
    8 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure4 noted
    4 of 49 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 51 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 150 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 51 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2333 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.landscaping-regina.com scores 88%, higher than 83% of the 2333 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites88% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several SEO issues that need immediate attention, especially around title tags, meta descriptions, and non-200 responses. Addressing these will improve visibility and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Response URLs

    Why: 95 URLs are not returning 200 responses, which can harm search engine rankings.

    How: Identify these URLs and ensure they either return a 2xx status or are redirected correctly.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Revise Title Tags

    Why: 6 pages have long title tags; ideal length is under 60 characters for better user visibility.

    How: Edit title tags to be concise and relevant, keeping within 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Update Meta Descriptions

    Why: 45 pages have meta description issues, affecting click-through rates.

    How: Create compelling meta descriptions for all pages, ideally between 50-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Add Missing H1 Tags

    Why: 6 pages are missing H1 tags, which are essential for SEO structure.

    How: Each of these pages should have a single, descriptive H1 tag added.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Improve Orphan Pages

    Why: 10 pages have no internal links pointing at them, making them harder for search engines to find.

    How: Add internal links to these pages from other relevant content on your site.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Address Redirects

    Why: 2 redirecting URLs could confuse search engines and waste crawl budget.

    How: Change the URLs to avoid redirecting; link directly to the final destination.

    Checks: redirects

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security vulnerabilities that need addressing to protect user data and improve security. Key missing headers include HSTS, Content Security Policy, and X-Frame-Options. Implementing these will enhance protection against common attacks.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, a user could be intercepted on their first visit if they type the address without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Lack of Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows scripts and resources to be loaded from any source, increasing risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    No X-Frame-Options for Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, your pages can be embedded in frames on other sites, risking clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, a browser could execute files based on their content type rather than declared type.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Use of Third-party Scripts without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains could be compromised, allowing malicious scripts to run on your site.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy restricting script sources or consider using SRI for third-party scripts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive paths listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Publicly accessible robots.txt can reveal sensitive paths that are not properly secured.

    Fix: Ensure sensitive areas have proper access controls instead of relying on robots.txt for security.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/concrete-driveway-regina/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/fireplace-regina/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/lawn-care-regina/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/lawn-maintenance-regina/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/paving-regina/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/regina-asphalt-paving/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/regina-snow-clearing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/snow-removal-regina/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/stump-removal-regina/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/tree-removal-regina/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 51 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/concrete-driveway-regina/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/fireplace-regina/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/lawn-care-regina/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/lawn-maintenance-regina/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/paving-regina/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/regina-asphalt-paving/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/regina-snow-clearing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/snow-removal-regina/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/stump-removal-regina/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/tree-removal-regina/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/concrete-driveway-regina/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/fireplace-regina/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/lawn-care-regina/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/lawn-maintenance-regina/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/paving-regina/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/regina-asphalt-paving/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/regina-snow-clearing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/snow-removal-regina/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/stump-removal-regina/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/tree-removal-regina/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/concrete-driveway-regina/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/fireplace-regina/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/lawn-care-regina/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/lawn-maintenance-regina/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/paving-regina/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/regina-asphalt-paving/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/regina-snow-clearing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/snow-removal-regina/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/stump-removal-regina/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.landscaping-regina.com/tree-removal-regina/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn.landscaping-regina.com (244 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 51 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.landscaping-regina.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.landscaping-regina.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.landscaping-regina.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.landscaping-regina.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.