Scanned sites / www.jodyrobbins.com / 2026-09-12-1721

www.jodyrobbins.com scan from 2026-09-12 17:21:50 UTC DR 34

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.jodyrobbins.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-1721

Scanned 2026-09-12 17:21:50 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 22:38:55 UTC. Found on page 4 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.jodyrobbins.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

88/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 727 pages and 1784 assets of www.jodyrobbins.com, starting from https://www.jodyrobbins.com/. It scored 88 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by sitemap coverage (685), title tags (238), meta descriptions (182); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to sitemap coverage (−6), title tags (−3.5), meta descriptions (−2.1). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Low1 low finding. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
727
Assets fetched
1784
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

2,511 of 2,511 discovered URLs were fetched, 35,533 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 3982 left unchecked.

  • Title tags238 issues
    238 of 685 pages have title issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.5 points
  • Meta descriptions182 issues
    182 of 685 pages have meta description issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.1 points
  • Headings9 issues
    9 of 685 pages have heading issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 141 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 3982 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.1 points
  • Redirects40 issues
    41 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses41 noted
    41 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 40 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 687 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt text8 issues
    8 of 15977 image references have no alt attribute. 7469 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 1784 fetched assets. 8 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage685 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 685 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −6 points
  • Internal link counts296 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 296 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 685 pages have fewer than 200 words. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format3 noted
    3 of 727 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 687 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives687 noted
    687 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1,039 noted
    1039 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure101 noted
    101 of 685 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length51 noted
    51 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies3 noted
    3 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 687 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 16 response headers recorded across 2511 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 687 pages; 592 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 49 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2333 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.jodyrobbins.com scores 88%, higher than 83% of the 2333 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites88% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has a few technical SEO issues needing attention. Prioritize fixing redirects, non-200 responses, title tags, meta descriptions, headings, and updating your sitemap. These changes can significantly enhance both user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix 301 Redirects

    Why: 41 redirecting URLs can confuse search engines and users.

    How: Analyze redirections and eliminate unnecessary ones. Ensure direct links lead to final destinations.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 41 URLs are not returning valid responses, harming user experience.

    How: Identify and fix non-200 URLs to serve 200 status.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Correct Title Tag Issues

    Why: 236 pages have title issues, affecting search rankings.

    How: Shorten titles to under 60 characters for best practice.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Update Meta Descriptions

    Why: 117 pages are missing or have long meta descriptions.

    How: Add concise meta descriptions under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Heading Structure

    Why: Multiple H1s can dilute content relevance.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 tag; adjust others to H2 or H3.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Improve Sitemap Coverage

    Why: 1 sitemap lacks listings for 685 pages, limiting discoverability.

    How: Update your sitemap to include all relevant URLs.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site uses several third-party scripts that lack Subresource Integrity (SRI), increasing the risk of script compromise. Implementing a proper Content Security Policy (CSP) that whitelists these scripts is recommended to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

  • 0 high
  • 0 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Third-party scripts without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Scripts from multiple external domains can be altered and introduce security risks if compromised.

    Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy that specifies the trusted domains for scripts. Consider replacing scripts with SRI where possible.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 5 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • scripts.scriptwrapper.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (1 script tag)
    • z-na.amazon-adsystem.com (23 script tags)
    • challenges.cloudflare.com (23 script tags)
12 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 687 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 687 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 687 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 687 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    150 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.jodyrobbins.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.jodyrobbins.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.jodyrobbins.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.jodyrobbins.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.