Scanned sites / www.invisioneye.ca / 2026-09-12-0756

www.invisioneye.ca scan from 2026-09-12 07:56:41 UTC DR 2

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.invisioneye.ca.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-0756

Scanned 2026-09-12 07:56:41 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 08:49:04 UTC

Site: https://www.invisioneye.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

90/ 100Excellent

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 98 pages and 71 assets of www.invisioneye.ca, starting from https://www.invisioneye.ca/. It scored 90 out of 100, an excellent result. 8 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (41), meta descriptions (36), sitemap coverage (36); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−4.3), meta descriptions (−3), sitemap coverage (−2.3). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
98
Assets fetched
71
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

169 of 169 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 11 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags41 issues
    41 of 93 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.3 points
  • Meta descriptions36 issues
    36 of 93 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 93 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites384 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 4 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 9 destinations checked.
  • Redirects2 issues
    2 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses2 noted
    2 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 2 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 93 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt text1 issue
    1 of 451 image references have no alt attribute. 1 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 71 fetched assets.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage36 issues
    1 sitemap listing 57 URLs: 36 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.3 points
  • Internal link counts4 noted
    Internal link counts for 96 pages; 4 worth a look.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 93 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 98 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 96 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives21 noted
    21 pages carry a robots directive; 75 carry none.
  • Anchor text5 noted
    5 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure9 noted
    9 of 93 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length1 noted
    0 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404s2 noted
    2 pages answer 200 but say they are not there.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 169 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 96 pages; 8 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2328 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.invisioneye.ca scores 90%, higher than 89% of the 2328 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 73 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 63 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites90% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site shows excellent health but has some areas needing improvement. Focus on fixing the redirect issues, optimizing title tags and meta descriptions, addressing headings, and updating the sitemap for better coverage.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Chained redirects can slow down page load times and confuse crawlers.

    How: Change the URL to directly link to the final destination, removing any intermediate redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: URLs with non-2xx responses can harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Ensure that both URLs return a 200 status by fixing or removing broken links.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Overly long titles can affect search engine visibility.

    How: Trim titles to be under 60 characters while retaining relevant keywords.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Long meta descriptions can be truncated in search results.

    How: Edit descriptions to be under 160 characters, maintaining key messaging.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Correct Heading Structure

    Why: Multiple H1 tags can confuse search engines about page hierarchy.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 tag and appropriate H2s as needed.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Update Sitemap

    Why: A complete sitemap helps search engines discover all pages.

    How: Add missing pages to the sitemap and submit it to search engines.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security vulnerabilities, including the lack of HTTP Strict Transport Security and exposure of a Google API key. Additionally, server banner disclosures could help attackers identify vulnerabilities. Immediate actions are necessary to enhance protection against potential threats.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users may be vulnerable to interception on first requests when accessing via HTTP.

    Fix: Add the header `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains` to all responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: The public Google API key may be misused if restrictions are not enforced on it.

    Fix: Restrict the API key usage in the Google Cloud console by setting proper HTTP referrer restrictions.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  3. 3

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Revealing the server version allows attackers to exploit known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Hide server information by configuring nginx to use `server_tokens off;` in your configuration.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  4. 4

    Lack of Subresource Integrity for Third-Party ScriptsLow

    Why it matters: Without SRI, compromised third-party scripts may alter site functionality or inject malicious content.

    Fix: Use Subresource Integrity for scripts from www.googleadservices.com and www.google.com, or implement a Content-Security-Policy specifying trusted sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Publicly listed disallowed paths can guide attackers to vulnerable areas of the site.

    Fix: Ensure proper access controls are in place for /wp-admin/ and /wp-login.php.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.invisioneye.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.invisioneye.ca/hours-location/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.invisioneye.ca/contact-us/appointment-request-form/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.invisioneye.ca/our-eye-doctors/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.invisioneye.ca/eye-care-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.invisioneye.ca/eyeglasses/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.invisioneye.ca/contact-lenses/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.invisioneye.ca/insurance/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.invisioneye.ca/eye-care-services/eye-exams/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.invisioneye.ca/eye-care-services/management-of-ocular-diseases/cataract-surgery-co-management/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.invisioneye.ca/eye-care-services/management-of-ocular-diseases/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.invisioneye.ca/team/dr-rod-peterson-od/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: nginx/1.26.3 (169 responses)
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…uY (39 chars) in https://www.invisioneye.ca/hours-location/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googleadservices.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 2 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-login.php
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 96 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 96 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 96 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    153 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.invisioneye.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.invisioneye.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.invisioneye.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.invisioneye.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.