Scanned sites / www.idahomassage.net

SEO report for www.idahomassage.net DR 0

The latest Site Spider scan of www.idahomassage.net, with 2 scans on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/www-idahomassage-net/2026-09-14-0402.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-14 04:02:28 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 04:09:02 UTC. Found on page 2 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.idahomassage.net/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

80/ 100Good

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 13 pages and 172 assets of www.idahomassage.net, starting from https://www.idahomassage.net/. It scored 80 out of 100, a good result. 5 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (7), meta descriptions (7), redirects (5); 15 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−8.8), meta descriptions (−7), redirects (−2.5). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
13
Assets fetched
172
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
5 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

185 of 185 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 18 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags7 issues
    7 of 8 pages have title issues.
    −8.8 points
  • Meta descriptions7 issues
    7 of 8 pages have meta description issues.
    −7 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 8 pages have heading issues.
    −0.8 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites17 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 3 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 18 destinations checked.
  • Redirects5 issues
    6 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −2.5 points
  • Non-200 responses6 noted
    6 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 5 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 8 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 11 image references have no alt attribute. 10 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 172 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverageOK
    2 sitemaps listing 8 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 8 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 8 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −1 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 13 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 8 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives8 noted
    8 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure3 noted
    3 of 8 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies4 noted
    4 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 8 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 185 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 8 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 62 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

What changed since the last scan

Score unchanged

www.idahomassage.net scored 80 out of 100 in both of its last two scans.

  1. 2026-09-13 00:02:52 UTC80/10013 pages
  2. 2026-09-14 04:02:28 UTC80/10013 pages

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2333 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.idahomassage.net scores 80%, higher than 51% of the 2333 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites80% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has some critical SEO issues that need addressing, particularly with redirects, title tags, and meta descriptions. Implementing these changes can enhance your site's visibility and ranking.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can confuse search engines and impact user experience.

    How: Update URLs like '/contact' to use the final URL without redirection.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Ensure all pages return a 200 status to be indexed properly.

    How: Fix issues on the URLs listed to make them accessible.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Short or missing title tags can hinder SEO performance.

    How: Create unique titles of 50-60 characters for each page, e.g., 'Idaho Massage Services - Expert Therapists'.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing descriptions can affect click-through rates from search results.

    How: Draft compelling meta descriptions of 150-160 characters for each page, summarizing content.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add H1 Headings

    Why: Each page should have a clear H1 for SEO and usability.

    How: Ensure each page has one H1 heading that describes its main topic.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Enhance Thin Content

    Why: Pages with low word count can be deemed unimportant by search engines.

    How: Add valuable content to the thin page, especially the sitemap page, to reach a minimum of 200 words.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks essential security headers, exposing it to several risks. Implementing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), a Content Security Policy (CSP), and other protective headers is crucial to enhance security against interception, injection attacks, and clickjacking. Additionally, sensitive paths in the robots.txt file may disclose private areas.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted on initial requests without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP increases risks of XSS by allowing scripts from any source.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this, your pages can be embedded into frames on malicious sites, leading to clickjacking.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: This allows browsers to misinterpret files, potentially running malicious scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: The site uses scripts from external sources without integrity checks, risking malicious modifications.

    Fix: Implement SRI for third-party scripts, or use a CSP to whitelist necessary domains.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The presence of private paths in robots.txt may aid attackers in probing the site.

    Fix: Restrict access to sensitive directories with proper authentication rather than relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.idahomassage.net/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/memberships/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/idaho-massage-faq/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/privacy-policy/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/sitemap/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/terms-of-use/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/thank-you/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 8 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.idahomassage.net/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/memberships/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/idaho-massage-faq/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/privacy-policy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/sitemap/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/terms-of-use/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/thank-you/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.idahomassage.net/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/memberships/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/idaho-massage-faq/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/privacy-policy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/sitemap/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/terms-of-use/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/thank-you/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.idahomassage.net/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/memberships/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/idaho-massage-faq/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/privacy-policy/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/sitemap/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/terms-of-use/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.idahomassage.net/thank-you/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.google.com (8 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (8 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 8 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of www.idahomassage.net

Sites scoring near www.idahomassage.net

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.idahomassage.net from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.idahomassage.net?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.idahomassage.net. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.