Scanned sites / www.grandvisioninstitute.com

SEO report for www.grandvisioninstitute.com DR 18

The latest Site Spider scan of www.grandvisioninstitute.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/www-grandvisioninstitute-com/2026-11-02-2030.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-11-02 20:30:14 UTC, finished 2026-11-02 20:38:41 UTC. Found on page 3 of brave web search results

Site: https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

85/ 100Good

On November 2, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 341 pages and 161 assets of www.grandvisioninstitute.com, starting from https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/. It scored 85 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (177), meta descriptions (147), sitemap coverage (182); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−5.4), meta descriptions (−3.6), sitemap coverage (−3.3). 15 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 3 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
341
Assets fetched
161
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

502 of 502 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 78 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags177 issues
    177 of 276 pages have title issues. 52 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.4 points
  • Meta descriptions147 issues
    147 of 276 pages have meta description issues. 52 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.6 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 276 pages have heading issues. 52 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 32 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 78 destinations checked.
    −0.2 points
  • Redirects13 issues
    17 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses17 noted
    17 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 13 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability9 issues
    9 of 289 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 39 pages noindex by design.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt text1 issue
    1 of 2125 image references have no alt attribute. 3 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets4 issues
    4 assets larger than 500 KB among 161 fetched assets.
    −2.4 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage182 issues
    1 sitemap listing 94 URLs: 182 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3.3 points
  • Internal link counts45 noted
    Internal link counts for 328 pages; 45 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 276 pages have fewer than 200 words. 52 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format61 noted
    61 of 341 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals13 noted
    13 of 328 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives244 noted
    244 pages carry a robots directive; 84 carry none.
  • Anchor text87 noted
    87 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure79 noted
    79 of 276 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 52 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length6 noted
    0 images over 100 KB; 6 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validation328 noted
    328 of 328 pages have HTML problems: 328 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured data11 noted
    328 of 276 indexable pages carry structured data: WebPage (328), LocalBusiness (328), MedicalBusiness (328), Optician (328), Organization (328). 11 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicates2 noted
    2 pages in 1 group read almost the same as another page (95% alike or more).
  • Soft 404s1 noted
    1 page answer 200 but say they are not there.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions1 noted
    1 of 276 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 502 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 328 pages; 131 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling82 noted
    82 words an English dictionary does not know, on 92 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2649 sites, median 80%, average 78%

www.grandvisioninstitute.com scores 85%, higher than 72% of the 2649 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0611220%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 5 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 5 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 8 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 15 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 40 sites67%: 39 sites68%: 37 sites69%: 49 sites70%: 48 sites71%: 75 sites72%: 73 sites73%: 79 sites74%: 78 sites75%: 84 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 106 sites78%: 119 sites79%: 109 sites80%: 121 sites81%: 117 sites82%: 120 sites83%: 120 sites84%: 122 sites85%: 100 sites86%: 88 sites87%: 89 sites88%: 72 sites89%: 73 sites90%: 49 sites91%: 56 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 22 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 16 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites85% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site has several technical SEO improvements to make, including fixing redirects, non-200 responses, and optimizing titles and meta descriptions. Prioritize these fixes for better indexability and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: 17 URLs are redirecting, causing potential confusion for users and search engines.

    How: Update the 17 redirecting URLs to point directly to their final destination without unnecessary hops.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 17 URLs did not return a 2xx response, which can harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Investigate the 17 URLs and ensure they return a proper 200 status by fixing or removing redirects.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Fix Title Issues

    Why: 177 pages have title issues, affecting their visibility and click-through rates.

    How: Revise the titles of affected pages to be within the recommended length of 50-60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 147 pages lack optimized meta descriptions, which can impact their search engine rankings.

    How: Craft unique, compelling meta descriptions for the 147 pages lacking them to improve click-through rates.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Heading Issues

    Why: 2 pages have multiple H1 tags, breaking the proper structure for SEO and accessibility.

    How: Edit the H1 structure on the 2 pages to ensure there's only one H1 tag per page.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Update Sitemap Coverage

    Why: 182 crawled pages are missing from your sitemap, potentially excluding them from indexing.

    How: Update your sitemap to include all crawled pages for better visibility in search engines.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security vulnerabilities, including missing HTTP headers that help protect user data and sensitive information, such as Google API keys. Key improvements are needed to enhance overall security.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 3 low
  • 2 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users may be vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks during unprotected connections.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Leaked Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: An exposed Google API key can be misused, potentially incurring charges or accessing unauthorized data.

    Fix: Restrict the API key to specific HTTP referrers in the Google Cloud console to mitigate risks.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  3. 3

    No Referrer Policy SetLow

    Why it matters: Without a referrer policy, sensitive URL information could be shared with third-party sites.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  4. 4

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Disclosing server software versions enhances the risk of targeted attacks based on known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Consider configuring the server to hide or modify the server header.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts Without Integrity ChecksLow

    Why it matters: Using scripts from other domains without Subresource Integrity can lead to compromised site functionality.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity for all external scripts where possible.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Without a permissions policy, unnecessary features remain enabled, which can be exploited if a script is injected.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self).

    Evidence: Permissions policy

  7. 7

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file lists sensitive paths that could expose site structure to attackers.

    Fix: Ensure proper access controls are in place for /wp-admin/ and /wp-login.php.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/eye-care-services/referring-physicians/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/events/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/hours-location/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/our-eye-doctors/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/the-staff/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/contact-us/testimonials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/hours-location/gift-giving/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/whats-new/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/eye-care-services/neuro-optometric-rehabilitation/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/eye-care-services/neuro-optometric-rehabilitation/common-vision-problems-associate… → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/eye-care-services/neuro-optometric-rehabilitation/vestibular-dysfunction/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/eye-care-services/referring-physicians/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/events/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/hours-location/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/our-eye-doctors/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/the-staff/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/contact-us/testimonials/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/hours-location/gift-giving/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/whats-new/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/eye-care-services/neuro-optometric-rehabilitation/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/eye-care-services/neuro-optometric-rehabilitation/common-vision-problems-associate… → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/eye-care-services/neuro-optometric-rehabilitation/vestibular-dysfunction/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/eye-care-services/referring-physicians/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/events/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/hours-location/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/our-eye-doctors/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/the-staff/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/contact-us/testimonials/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/hours-location/gift-giving/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/whats-new/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/eye-care-services/neuro-optometric-rehabilitation/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/eye-care-services/neuro-optometric-rehabilitation/common-vision-problems-associate… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/eye-care-services/neuro-optometric-rehabilitation/vestibular-dysfunction/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: nginx/1.26.3 (502 responses)
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…uY (39 chars) in https://www.grandvisioninstitute.com/hours-location/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • www.googleadservices.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (4 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 2 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-login.php
8 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 328 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 328 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 328 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    130 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of www.grandvisioninstitute.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near www.grandvisioninstitute.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.grandvisioninstitute.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.grandvisioninstitute.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.grandvisioninstitute.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.