Scanned sites / www.georgiaoak.com

SEO report for www.georgiaoak.com DR 7

The latest Site Spider scan of www.georgiaoak.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/www-georgiaoak-com/2026-09-18-2000.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-18 20:00:01 UTC, finished 2026-09-18 20:04:53 UTC. Found on page 1 of chatgpt for browser (api usage) results

Site: https://www.georgiaoak.com/contact-us

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

83/ 100Good

On September 18, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 280 pages and 7 assets of www.georgiaoak.com, starting from https://www.georgiaoak.com/contact-us. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (231), title tags (185), links to other sites (10); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−6.9), meta descriptions (−6.9), links to other sites (−1.5). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Low2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
280
Assets fetched
7
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

287 of 287 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 123 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags185 issues
    185 of 263 pages have title issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.9 points
  • Meta descriptions231 issues
    231 of 263 pages have meta description issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.9 points
  • Headings15 issues
    15 of 263 pages have heading issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.3 points
  • Broken links3 issues
    269 internal links point at 3 broken URLs.
    −0.2 points
  • Links to other sites10 issues
    10 destinations answered with an error, 52 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 123 destinations checked.
    −1.5 points
  • Redirects10 issues
    10 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses3 issues
    13 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 13 of them are pages, 3 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 263 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 4 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt text2 issues
    2 of 1676 image references have no alt attribute. 142 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 7 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pages34 issues
    34 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.5 points
  • Sitemap coverage34 issues
    1 sitemap listing 263 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 34 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.8 points
  • Internal link counts267 noted
    Internal link counts for 267 pages; 267 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 263 pages have fewer than 200 words. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content3 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format45 noted
    45 of 280 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 267 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives4 noted
    4 pages carry a robots directive; 263 carry none.
  • Anchor text5 noted
    5 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure229 noted
    229 of 263 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length1 noted
    0 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 267 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 287 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 267 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 60 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.georgiaoak.com scores 83%, higher than 61% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites83% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Addressing broken links and title/meta description issues will improve site health. Focus on the highest-impact fixes first for better user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 269 internal links lead to broken URLs, harming user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify broken links from your crawl report and update or remove them.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 13 URLs return non-200 responses, which can frustrate users and impair ranking.

    How: Check URLs with non-200 status and redirect or rectify the servers accordingly.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Correct Title Tags

    Why: 185 pages have title issues, negatively affecting search visibility.

    How: Revise titles to be unique and at least 30 characters long; use an SEO plugin or CMS feature.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Update Meta Descriptions

    Why: 222 pages have meta description issues, limiting click-through rates.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions of 150-160 characters for each affected page.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: 15 pages have heading issues that confuse search engines and users.

    How: Ensure each page has one H1 and appropriate hierarchy of headings.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: 34 orphan pages lack internal links, limiting discoverability.

    How: Add internal links to orphan pages from relevant high-traffic pages.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has some security enhancements needed, particularly in securing referrer information and controlling permissions for scripts. Implementing the recommended headers will improve user privacy and script safety.

  • 0 high
  • 0 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: No referrer-policy is set, which could expose the full URL path of pages users visit.

    Fix: Add the header 'Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade' to all HTML pages to protect users' referrer data.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  2. 2

    Insecure Third-Party ScriptsLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains lack Subresource Integrity, exposing the site to risks if any script source is compromised.

    Fix: Consider implementing Subresource Integrity for these scripts or establish a robust Content-Security-Policy that restricts the valid sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Lack of permissions-policy can lead to unnecessary access to features like camera or geolocation by potential malicious scripts.

    Fix: Include the header 'Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=()' on all HTML pages to restrict access to unused features.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/contact-us → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/sectors → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/sectors/manufacturing → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/sectors/manufacturing/case-studies/teamone-logistics → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/sectors/manufacturing/case-studies/transforming-a-former-regional-boat-brand-to-a-global-bra… → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/sectors/manufacturing/case-studies/farm-burger → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/sectors/manufacturing/case-studies/jump-starting-growth → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/sectors/manufacturing/case-studies/the-emerald-story → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/sectors/manufacturing/case-studies/building-a-home-services-powerhouse-in-the-southeast → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/sectors/manufacturing/case-studies/a-minority-investment-in-large-potential → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/sectors/manufacturing/case-studies/the-septic-blue-story → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/contact-us → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/sectors → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/sectors/manufacturing → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/sectors/manufacturing/case-studies/teamone-logistics → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/sectors/manufacturing/case-studies/transforming-a-former-regional-boat-brand-to-a-global-bra… → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/sectors/manufacturing/case-studies/farm-burger → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/sectors/manufacturing/case-studies/jump-starting-growth → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/sectors/manufacturing/case-studies/the-emerald-story → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/sectors/manufacturing/case-studies/building-a-home-services-powerhouse-in-the-southeast → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/sectors/manufacturing/case-studies/a-minority-investment-in-large-potential → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.georgiaoak.com/sectors/manufacturing/case-studies/the-septic-blue-story → no permissions-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • a.mmin.io (40 script tags)
    • static.cdn-website.com (120 script tags)
    • cdn.userway.org (40 script tags)
12 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 267 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 267 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 267 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 267 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of www.georgiaoak.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near www.georgiaoak.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.georgiaoak.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.georgiaoak.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.georgiaoak.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.