Scanned sites / www.fungwee.com
SEO report for www.fungwee.com DR 7
The latest Site Spider scan of www.fungwee.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/www-fungwee-com/2026-09-09-0104.
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Latest scan
Scanned 2026-09-09 01:04:09 UTC, finished 2026-09-09 01:06:06 UTC
Site: https://www.fungwee.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On September 9, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 36 pages and 187 assets of www.fungwee.com, starting from https://www.fungwee.com/. It scored 70 out of 100, a result that needs work. 8 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (34), title tags (27), thin content (33); 12 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.6), title tags (−7.5), thin content (−7.3). 6 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium2 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 36
- Assets fetched
- 187
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 8 of 26
223 of 223 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript.
- Title tags27 issues27 of 34 pages have title issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−7.5 points
- Meta descriptions34 issues34 of 34 pages have meta description issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−7.6 points
- Headings34 issues34 of 34 pages have heading issues. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−5.7 points
- Broken linksOK0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
- Links to other sitesNot checkedNot checked: the crawl fetched nothing this check can look at.
- Redirects1 noted1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
- Non-200 responses184 noted184 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability2 issues2 of 36 indexable pages have indexability warnings.−0.6 points
- Image alt text6 issues6 of 236 image references have no alt attribute. 104 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.−0.2 points
- Heavy assetsOK0 assets larger than 500 KB among 187 fetched assets.
- Orphan pages3 issues3 pages have no internal links pointing at them.−0.3 points
- Sitemap coverage3 issues2 sitemaps listing 34 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 3 reachable only via the sitemap.−0.5 points
- Internal link countsOKInternal link counts for 36 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
- Thin content33 issues33 of 34 pages have fewer than 200 words. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−7.3 points
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL formatOKAll 36 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
- Canonicals2 noted2 of 36 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directivesOKNo page carries a robots directive; all 36 pages are open to search engines.
- Anchor text5 noted5 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structure11 noted11 of 34 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 2 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Image weight and alt lengthOKNo image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomaliesOKNo redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
- HTML and head validationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- hreflangNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Structured dataNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Near duplicatesNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Soft 404sOKNone of 36 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positionsNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
- PaginationNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
- Headers and cookiesOK0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 223 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 36 pages; 4 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed Insights5 notedMobile performance 77 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
- SpellingNot checkedNot checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
Where this site sits among all scanned sites
2314 sites, median 79%, average 78%
www.fungwee.com scores 70%, higher than 18% of the 2314 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsWritten from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.
Your website needs several improvements to enhance SEO. Focus on fixing the non-200 responses and improve title tags, meta descriptions, and headings for better visibility.
- 1
Fix Non-200 Responses
Why: 184 URLs not returning 2xx affect user access and search visibility.
How: Identify and resolve the errors for each listed URL. Replace or remove broken assets.
Checks: status-codes
- 2
Update Title Tags
Why: 27 title issues can lead to decreased click-through rates and lower rankings.
How: Revise short title tags (<30 characters) and ensure all titles are under 60 characters.
Checks: titles
- 3
Improve Meta Descriptions
Why: 34 missing or problematic descriptions can reduce search engine visibility.
How: Create unique meta descriptions for all pages, ideally between 50-160 characters.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 4
Add Missing H1 Headings
Why: 34 pages lacking H1 tags can confuse search engines about content relevance.
How: Ensure every page has one H1 heading that clearly describes its content.
Checks: headings
- 5
Link to Orphan Pages
Why: 3 orphan pages limit their visibility in search results.
How: Add internal links to these pages from relevant content throughout the site.
Checks: orphan-pages
- 6
Enhance Thin Content
Why: 33 pages with <200 words can weaken your website's authority.
How: Add valuable content to these pages to meet or exceed 200 words.
Checks: thin-content
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThe website lacks crucial security headers, making it vulnerable to certain attacks like cross-site scripting and clickjacking. Implementing the recommended security measures will help protect user data and enhance overall site security.
- 0 high
- 2 medium
- 1 low
- 0 info
- 1
Missing Content Security PolicyMedium
Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, the site is vulnerable to cross-site scripting attacks.
Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header to your HTTP responses. For example: 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';'.
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 2
Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium
Why it matters: The absence of X-Frame-Options allows the site to be framed, exposing it to clickjacking attacks.
Fix: Add an X-Frame-Options header to your HTTP responses. For example: 'X-Frame-Options: DENY'.
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 3
Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow
Why it matters: Scripts from third-party domains can be compromised, potentially allowing malicious scripts to run on your site.
Fix: Consider implementing Subresource Integrity for third-party scripts or restrict their sources with a Content Security Policy.
Evidence: Third-party scripts
What the checks found
- FoundContent Security PolicyMedium
None of the 36 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.
- https://www.fungwee.com/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.fungwee.com/branding → no content-security-policy
- https://www.fungwee.com/intranet → no content-security-policy
- https://www.fungwee.com/app-and-web → no content-security-policy
- https://www.fungwee.com/illustrations → no content-security-policy
- https://www.fungwee.com/vusionvr → no content-security-policy
- https://www.fungwee.com/growthengine → no content-security-policy
- https://www.fungwee.com/3hbiotechnology → no content-security-policy
- https://www.fungwee.com/943-the-drive → no content-security-policy
- https://www.fungwee.com/dadan-sivunivut → no content-security-policy
- https://www.fungwee.com/memi → no content-security-policy
- https://www.fungwee.com/synchrony-financial → no content-security-policy
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://www.fungwee.com/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.fungwee.com/branding → no x-frame-options
- https://www.fungwee.com/intranet → no x-frame-options
- https://www.fungwee.com/app-and-web → no x-frame-options
- https://www.fungwee.com/illustrations → no x-frame-options
- https://www.fungwee.com/vusionvr → no x-frame-options
- https://www.fungwee.com/growthengine → no x-frame-options
- https://www.fungwee.com/3hbiotechnology → no x-frame-options
- https://www.fungwee.com/943-the-drive → no x-frame-options
- https://www.fungwee.com/dadan-sivunivut → no x-frame-options
- https://www.fungwee.com/memi → no x-frame-options
- https://www.fungwee.com/synchrony-financial → no x-frame-options
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- static.parastorage.com (352 script tags)
- browser.sentry-cdn.com (36 script tags)
9 checks passed, 4 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 36 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKHTTP Strict Transport Security
strict-transport-security is set on all 36 HTML pages.
- OKMIME sniffing protection
x-content-type-options is set on all 36 HTML pages.
- OKSoftware version disclosure
The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- OKSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.
- Not applicableReferrer policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicablePermissions policy
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicableCookie flags
This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.
- Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries
No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Earlier scans of www.fungwee.com
No other scans of this site yet.
Sites scoring near www.fungwee.com
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- ellersliepet.caDR 1570/100 · rank 1858 · 132 pages
- thelemontree.caDR 170/100 · rank 1858 · 35 pages
- fungwee.comDR 770/100 · rank 1858 · 37 pages
- miguelcarrasco.comDR 669/100 · rank 1902 · 1 page
- blkwtr.comDR 4869/100 · rank 1902 · 44 pages
- www.sescustomhomes.comDR 069/100 · rank 1902 · 122 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.fungwee.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own www.fungwee.com?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.fungwee.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.