Scanned sites / www.fargoeyecare.com / 2026-09-11-1221

www.fargoeyecare.com scan from 2026-09-11 12:21:49 UTC DR 3

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.fargoeyecare.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-11-1221

Scanned 2026-09-11 12:21:49 UTC, finished 2026-09-11 12:27:38 UTC

Site: https://www.fargoeyecare.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

91/ 100Excellent

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 226 pages and 67 assets of www.fargoeyecare.com, starting from https://www.fargoeyecare.com/. It scored 91 out of 100, an excellent result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (54), meta descriptions (51), heavy assets (3); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−2.7), meta descriptions (−2), heavy assets (−1.8). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
226
Assets fetched
67
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

293 of 293 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 20 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags54 issues
    54 of 78 pages have title issues. 123 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.7 points
  • Meta descriptions51 issues
    51 of 78 pages have meta description issues. 123 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 78 pages have heading issues. 123 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links3 issues
    203 internal links point at 3 broken URLs.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sites442 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 8 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 16 destinations checked.
  • Redirects19 issues
    18 redirecting URLs, 5 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses7 issues
    29 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 25 of them are pages, 7 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.3 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 78 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 123 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1107 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 67 fetched assets.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage54 issues
    1 sitemap listing 24 URLs: 54 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.6 points
  • Internal link counts123 noted
    Internal link counts for 201 pages; 123 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 78 pages have fewer than 200 words. 123 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format16 noted
    16 of 226 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 201 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives193 noted
    193 pages carry a robots directive; 8 carry none.
  • Anchor text127 noted
    127 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure57 noted
    57 of 78 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 123 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length2 noted
    0 images over 100 KB; 2 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies8 noted
    8 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404s1 noted
    1 page answer 200 but say they are not there.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 293 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 201 pages; 135 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 45 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2323 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.fargoeyecare.com scores 91%, higher than 90% of the 2323 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 63 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites91% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Several issues need attention, particularly broken links and title/meta description problems. Addressing these will enhance user experience and SEO effectively.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links lead to a poor user experience and can harm SEO.

    How: Identify the broken URLs and either remove them or update them to point to valid pages.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Minimize Redirects

    Why: Too many redirects can slow down page loading and impact SEO.

    How: Eliminate unnecessary redirects and consolidate URL paths wherever possible.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Pages not returning a valid response can frustrate users and reduce rankings.

    How: Fix pages with non-200 status codes so they return a 200 status.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Enhance Title Tags

    Why: Optimized title tags improve click-through rates and rankings.

    How: Revise the 54 problematic title tags to meet best practices (30-60 characters).

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing meta descriptions can lower click-through rates.

    How: Add unique meta descriptions for the 40 pages lacking them, keeping it under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Address Heading Issues

    Why: Proper heading structure aids in SEO and accessibility.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 tag and correct any pages with issues.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has security vulnerabilities including missing HTTP Strict Transport Security, revealing server version info, and exposed API keys. These issues could lead to interception of user data and exploitation by attackers. Action is needed to enhance security.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, initial requests can be intercepted if users type the address without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload' to response headers.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: An exposed API key can lead to unauthorized access and misuse of services.

    Fix: Restrict the API key usage in the Google Cloud console by setting HTTP referrer restrictions.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  3. 3

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: The server reveals its version, which can be exploited by attackers to find vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Modify server settings to obscure version information; ensure 'server_tokens off;' is configured in nginx.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  4. 4

    No Subresource Integrity for Third-Party ScriptsLow

    Why it matters: Lack of SRI means compromised scripts from third-party domains can change site behavior.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy that specifies trusted sources for scripts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Listing sensitive paths does not restrict access but exposes them to potential probing.

    Fix: Review access controls for /wp-admin/ and /wp-login.php; consider removing them from robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/location/eye-care-associates-fargo/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/location/eye-care-associates-fargo-2/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/contact-us/appointment-request-form/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/our-eye-care-clinic/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/our-eye-doctors/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/eye-exams/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/optos-retinal-screening/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/eye-exams/pediatric-eye-exams/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/management-of-ocular-diseases/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.fargoeyecare.com/eye-care-services/eye-emergencies-pinkred-eyes/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: nginx/1.26.3 (293 responses)
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…uY (39 chars) in https://www.fargoeyecare.com/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googleadservices.com (40 script tags)
    • ecpbuilder.com (19 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 2 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-login.php
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 201 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 201 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 201 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    77 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.fargoeyecare.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.fargoeyecare.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.fargoeyecare.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.fargoeyecare.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.