Scanned sites / www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com / 2026-09-21-1400

www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com scan from 2026-09-21 14:00:01 UTC DR 11

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-21-1400

Scanned 2026-09-21 14:00:01 UTC, finished 2026-09-21 14:25:56 UTC. Found on page 2 of chatgpt for browser (api usage) results

Site: https://www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

84/ 100Good

On September 21, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 78 pages and 124 assets of www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com, starting from https://www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com/. It scored 84 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (41), headings (47), meta descriptions (31); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−5.8), headings (−4), meta descriptions (−3.5). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
78
Assets fetched
124
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

202 of 202 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 26 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags41 issues
    41 of 61 pages have title issues. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.8 points
  • Meta descriptions31 issues
    31 of 61 pages have meta description issues. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.5 points
  • Headings47 issues
    47 of 61 pages have heading issues. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4 points
  • Broken links2 issues
    72 internal links point at 2 broken URLs.
    −0.6 points
  • Links to other sites216 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 6 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 26 destinations checked.
  • Redirects5 issues
    6 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.3 points
  • Non-200 responses2 issues
    8 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 7 of them are pages, 2 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.3 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 61 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 10 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 144 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 124 fetched assets.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pages3 issues
    3 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.2 points
  • Sitemap coverage6 issues
    4 sitemaps listing 58 URLs: 3 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 3 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.5 points
  • Internal link counts10 noted
    Internal link counts for 71 pages; 10 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 61 pages have fewer than 200 words. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format4 noted
    4 of 78 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals10 noted
    10 of 71 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives71 noted
    71 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text48 noted
    48 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure48 noted
    48 of 61 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 10 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies3 noted
    3 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 71 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 19 response headers recorded across 202 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 71 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 91 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com scores 84%, higher than 65% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites84% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The crawl identified several issues that need addressing for optimal SEO performance, including broken links and title tag problems. Prioritizing these will enhance user experience and search engine visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 72 internal links point to broken URLs, affecting user navigation and SEO ranking.

    How: Identify and update or remove broken links found on your site.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 8 URLs returned non-2xx responses, which can frustrate users and hurt SEO.

    How: Change these URLs to return a proper 200 status or redirect appropriately.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: 41 pages have title issues that could impact search engine rankings.

    How: Revise titles to be under 60 characters and unique for each page.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 31 pages lack proper meta descriptions, affecting click-through rates.

    How: Write unique meta descriptions under 160 characters for affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Multiple H1 Issues

    Why: 47 pages have multiple H1 tags, confusing search engines about the main topic.

    How: Ensure each page has only one H1 tag that contains the main title.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: 3 orphan pages have no internal links, limiting their visibility.

    How: Add internal links from relevant pages to these orphan pages.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has some security concerns primarily related to server version disclosure and a weak Content Security Policy. Addressing these issues can enhance the site's security posture against potential attacks.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Weak Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: The CSP allows 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval', reducing its effectiveness against script injection attacks.

    Fix: Revise the CSP to exclude 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval'. Consider specifying allowed script sources only: 'default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' https:;'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: The server response reveals specific versions of Apache and nginx, exposing the site to targeted attacks based on known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Hide server version details by configuring the servers to not disclose version information. For Apache, use 'ServerTokens Prod' and 'ServerSignature Off'.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  3. 3

    Third-party Scripts without SRILow

    Why it matters: Third-party scripts loaded from another domain lack Subresource Integrity, making them vulnerable to hijacking.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) for third-party scripts or restrict their sources in your CSP.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  4. 4

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file discloses paths that could reveal sensitive areas of the site to attackers.

    Fix: Restrict access to sensitive paths like /wp-admin/ and /wp-login.php with proper authentication instead of relying solely on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: Apache/2.4.68 (Debian) (137 responses)
    • server: nginx (65 responses)
  • NoteContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, but it allows inline or eval scripts ('unsafe-inline' / 'unsafe-eval'), which removes most of its protection against injected scripts.

    • https://www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-sr
    • https://www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com/practice-areas/family-law-lawyers-des-moines-ia/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-sr
    • https://www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com/practice-area/divorce-lawyers-des-moines-ia/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-sr
    • https://www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com/practice-area/child-custody-lawyers-des-moines-ia/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-sr
    • https://www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com/practice-area/alimony-lawyers-des-moines-ia/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-sr
    • https://www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com/practice-area/modification-lawyers-des-moines-ia/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-sr
    • https://www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com/practice-area/domestic-abuse-protective-order-lawyers-des-moines-ia/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blo
    • https://www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com/practice-area/termination-parental-rights-lawyers-des-moines-ia/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:;
    • https://www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com/practice-area/guardianship-adoption-lawyers-des-moines-ia/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-
    • https://www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com/practice-area/child-support-lawyers-des-moines-ia/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-sr
    • https://www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com/about-us/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-sr
    • https://www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com/about-us/gary-e-hill/ → default-src 'self' https: data: blob:; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https: data: blob:; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https: data: blob:; img-src 'self' https: data: blob:; font-src 'self' https: data:; connect-src 'self' https: wss: ws:; frame-src 'self' https: blob:; media-sr
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn.callrail.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 2 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-login.php
11 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 71 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 71 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 71 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 71 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 71 HTML pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 71 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    2 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.familylawsolutionsofiowa.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.