Scanned sites / www.dancecenterofspokane.com / 2026-09-12-0408

www.dancecenterofspokane.com scan from 2026-09-12 04:08:48 UTC DR 15

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.dancecenterofspokane.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-0408

Scanned 2026-09-12 04:08:48 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 08:04:02 UTC

Site: https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

83/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 105 pages and 762 assets of www.dancecenterofspokane.com, starting from https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 13 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (125), meta descriptions (39), headings (38); 5 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−3.1), headings (−2.2). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
105
Assets fetched
762
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

867 of 876 discovered URLs were fetched, 9 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 16 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags1 issue
    1 of 39 pages have title issues. 63 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Meta descriptions39 issues
    39 of 39 pages have meta description issues. 63 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.1 points
  • Headings38 issues
    38 of 39 pages have heading issues. 63 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.2 points
  • Broken links2 issues
    4 internal links point at 2 broken URLs.
    −0.4 points
  • Links to other sites412 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 6 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 13 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 issue
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses2 issues
    4 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 3 of them are pages, 2 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability22 issues
    22 of 96 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 6 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −2.2 points
  • Image alt text204 issues
    204 of 2677 image references have no alt attribute. 532 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.5 points
  • Heavy assets125 issues
    125 assets larger than 500 KB among 762 fetched assets. 2 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages15 issues
    15 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.6 points
  • Sitemap coverage17 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 41 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 15 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1 points
  • Internal link counts62 noted
    Internal link counts for 102 pages; 62 worth a look.
  • Thin content10 issues
    10 of 39 pages have fewer than 200 words. 63 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.8 points
  • Duplicate content2 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.2 points
  • URL format52 noted
    52 of 105 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals63 noted
    63 of 102 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives6 noted
    6 pages carry a robots directive; 96 carry none.
  • Anchor text56 noted
    56 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure1 noted
    1 of 39 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 63 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length105 noted
    105 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 102 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 10 response headers recorded across 867 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 102 pages; 80 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 63 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2328 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.dancecenterofspokane.com scores 83%, higher than 65% of the 2328 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 63 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 46 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites83% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Several issues need addressing, including broken links, missing title tags, and meta descriptions across all pages. Focus on resolving these for improved SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links can harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Update the 4 internal links that point to broken URLs to direct to functioning pages.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirect Issues

    Why: Improper redirects can confuse users and search engines.

    How: Update the two URLs that are redirecting (e.g., sitemap.xml and team/) to ensure they point correctly.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Add Title Tags

    Why: A missing title tag hinders search visibility.

    How: Create a unique title tag for the homepage with relevant keywords.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Implement Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing meta descriptions reduce click-through rates from search results.

    How: Write concise and appealing meta descriptions for all pages with issues.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: Correct headings improve content structure and SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 and appropriate H2 tags.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Improve Indexability

    Why: Indexability issues may prevent pages from ranking.

    How: Investigate the 20 indexable pages with warnings to clarify any indexing problems.

    Checks: indexability

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks several essential security headers, exposing it to various vulnerabilities, including script execution from unintended sources and clickjacking. Immediate action is needed to implement recommended protections to safeguard user data and site integrity.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted if they access the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload'.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: The lack of a CSP allows scripts to load from any source, increasing risks of cross-site scripting (XSS).

    Fix: Add the header: 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';'. This can be adjusted based on your needs.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, your site is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: 'X-Frame-Options: DENY'.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Absence of this header allows browsers to execute files as scripts based on content instead of declared type.

    Fix: Add the header: 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff'.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Using scripts from external sources without SRI can lead to security breaches if those sources are compromised.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy that includes the domain 'www.google.com' or use SRI for these scripts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/staff/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/classes-registration/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/performance/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/recital2025/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/team-2/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/spokane-ballet-ensemble/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/preschool/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/events-2/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/?s= → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 102 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/staff/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/classes-registration/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/performance/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/recital2025/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/team-2/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/spokane-ballet-ensemble/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/preschool/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/events-2/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/?s= → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/staff/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/classes-registration/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/performance/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/recital2025/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/team-2/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/spokane-ballet-ensemble/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/preschool/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/events-2/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/?s= → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/staff/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/classes-registration/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/performance/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/recital2025/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/team-2/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/spokane-ballet-ensemble/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/preschool/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/events-2/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.dancecenterofspokane.com/?s= → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.google.com (2 script tags)
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 102 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    3 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.dancecenterofspokane.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.dancecenterofspokane.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.dancecenterofspokane.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.dancecenterofspokane.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.