Scanned sites / www.carevet.com / 2026-09-12-1432

www.carevet.com scan from 2026-09-12 14:32:14 UTC DR 57

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.carevet.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-1432

Scanned 2026-09-12 14:32:14 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 17:46:12 UTC

Site: https://www.carevet.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

71/ 100Needs work

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 120 pages and 1000 assets of www.carevet.com, starting from https://www.carevet.com/. It scored 71 out of 100, a result that needs work. 13 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (88), heavy assets (32), sitemap coverage (92); 5 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.6), heavy assets (−6), sitemap coverage (−5.2). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
120
Assets fetched
1000
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 26
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,120 of 1,120 discovered URLs were fetched, 312 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 62 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags43 issues
    43 of 92 pages have title issues. 14 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.1 points
  • Meta descriptions88 issues
    88 of 92 pages have meta description issues. 14 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.6 points
  • Headings65 issues
    65 of 92 pages have heading issues. 14 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.7 points
  • Broken links3 issues
    3 internal links point at 3 broken URLs.
    −0.6 points
  • Links to other sites6 issues
    6 destinations answered with an error, 19 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 59 destinations checked.
    −2.2 points
  • Redirects11 issues
    12 redirecting URLs, 3 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses3 issues
    15 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 14 of them are pages, 3 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.3 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 95 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 11 pages noindex by design.
    −0.2 points
  • Image alt text2 issues
    2 of 782 image references have no alt attribute. 515 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets32 issues
    32 assets larger than 500 KB among 1000 fetched assets. 6 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage92 issues
    65 sitemaps listing 0 URLs: 92 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −5.2 points
  • Internal link counts10 noted
    Internal link counts for 106 pages; 10 worth a look.
  • Thin content2 issues
    2 of 92 pages have fewer than 200 words. 14 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 120 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals14 noted
    14 of 106 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives106 noted
    106 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text76 noted
    76 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure16 noted
    16 of 92 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 14 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length97 noted
    97 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies7 noted
    7 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 106 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 1120 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 106 pages; 1 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2332 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.carevet.com scores 71%, higher than 20% of the 2332 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites71% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several critical issues affecting its SEO performance. Prioritize fixing broken links, redirects, and enhancing titles and meta descriptions for better user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links lead to a poor user experience and can harm SEO.

    How: Update or remove links pointing to the broken URLs listed.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Clean Up Redirects

    Why: Chained redirects can cause slow loading times and dilute link equity.

    How: Reduce chained redirects by updating the original links to point directly to the final URLs.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Broken pages affect user experience and ranking.

    How: Identify and fix the 15 URLs that return non-200 responses.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Missing and short title tags hurt SEO and brand visibility.

    How: Update titles to be descriptive and within 30-60 characters for affected pages.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing meta descriptions can reduce click-through rates from search results.

    How: Add relevant meta descriptions for the pages that currently lack them.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Address Headings Issues

    Why: Improper heading structures can confuse search engines regarding content hierarchy.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 and an appropriate structure of H2s or H3s as needed.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website www.carevet.com lacks important security headers and has exposed a Google API key. Implementing HTTP Strict Transport Security, Content Security Policy, and X-Frame-Options will improve security significantly. Also, restrict the API key usage to mitigate exposure risks.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: No HSTS header increases the risk of man-in-the-middle attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: No CSP header can lead to unauthorized scripts, styles, or frames being loaded.

    Fix: Implement a CSP header like: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self';.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing Clickjacking Protection (X-Frame-Options)Medium

    Why it matters: Without this header, the site can be embedded in frames, risking clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Leaked Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: Exposure of the API key can lead to unauthorized usage and potential service bills.

    Fix: Restrict the API key usage in the Google Cloud console by HTTP referrer.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  5. 5

    Third-party Scripts without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Compromised third-party scripts can affect site's security.

    Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy to restrict script loading from trusted domains.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.carevet.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.carevet.com/what-we-offer/owners/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.carevet.com/what-we-offer/veterinarians/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.carevet.com/what-we-offer/team-members/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.carevet.com/what-we-offer/pet-parents/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.carevet.com/clinical-outcomes/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.carevet.com/clinical-cases/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.carevet.com/clinical-outcomes-past-results/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.carevet.com/clinical-outcomes-showcase/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.carevet.com/our-team/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.carevet.com/embark/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.carevet.com/webinars/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 106 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.carevet.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.carevet.com/what-we-offer/owners/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.carevet.com/what-we-offer/veterinarians/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.carevet.com/what-we-offer/team-members/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.carevet.com/what-we-offer/pet-parents/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.carevet.com/clinical-outcomes/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.carevet.com/clinical-cases/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.carevet.com/clinical-outcomes-past-results/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.carevet.com/clinical-outcomes-showcase/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.carevet.com/our-team/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.carevet.com/embark/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.carevet.com/webinars/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.carevet.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.carevet.com/what-we-offer/owners/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.carevet.com/what-we-offer/veterinarians/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.carevet.com/what-we-offer/team-members/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.carevet.com/what-we-offer/pet-parents/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.carevet.com/clinical-outcomes/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.carevet.com/clinical-cases/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.carevet.com/clinical-outcomes-past-results/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.carevet.com/clinical-outcomes-showcase/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.carevet.com/our-team/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.carevet.com/embark/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.carevet.com/webinars/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…CM (39 chars) in https://www.carevet.com/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 7 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • tag.simpli.fi (1 script tag)
    • www.lightboxcdn.com (40 script tags)
    • cdnjs.cloudflare.com (40 script tags)
    • js.hs-scripts.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (7 script tags)
    • unpkg.com (1 script tag)
    • maps.googleapis.com (1 script tag)
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 106 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 106 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    56 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.carevet.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.carevet.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.carevet.com?