Scanned sites / www.cafecarlo.com / 2026-09-11-1721

www.cafecarlo.com scan from 2026-09-11 17:21:43 UTC DR 19

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.cafecarlo.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-11-1721

Scanned 2026-09-11 17:21:43 UTC, finished 2026-09-11 17:38:32 UTC

Site: https://www.cafecarlo.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

81/ 100Good

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 13 pages and 300 assets of www.cafecarlo.com, starting from https://www.cafecarlo.com/. It scored 81 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (12), heavy assets (9), title tags (3); 12 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−8), heavy assets (−5.4), title tags (−2.5). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
13
Assets fetched
300
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

313 of 313 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 10 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags3 issues
    3 of 12 pages have title issues.
    −2.5 points
  • Meta descriptions12 issues
    12 of 12 pages have meta description issues.
    −8 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 12 pages have heading issues.
    −1 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites50 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 6 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 9 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 issue
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.3 points
  • Non-200 responses2 noted
    2 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 12 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt text4 issues
    4 of 83 image references have no alt attribute. 78 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.3 points
  • Heavy assets9 issues
    9 assets larger than 500 KB among 300 fetched assets.
    −5.4 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverageOK
    2 sitemaps listing 12 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 12 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content3 issues
    3 of 12 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −2 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 13 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 12 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives12 noted
    12 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure2 noted
    2 of 12 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length44 noted
    44 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 12 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 313 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 12 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 57 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2325 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.cafecarlo.com scores 81%, higher than 55% of the 2325 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 76 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 63 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites81% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has a good health score, but there are critical issues to address, particularly with redirects, missing titles, and meta descriptions. Prioritizing these fixes will enhance user experience and SEO performance significantly.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can confuse search engines and users.

    How: Remove unnecessary redirects for 'https://www.cafecarlo.com/reservations' and 'https://www.cafecarlo.com/sitemap.xml', linking them directly to their final URLs.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses can hinder page visibility to users and search engines.

    How: Address the URLs returning non-200 responses by verifying their content and ensuring they serve the right status codes.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Duplicate and short title tags can negatively affect SEO and click-through rates.

    How: Ensure all pages have unique and descriptive title tags, especially correcting the FAQ title to be longer than 30 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta description duplication can lower search engine relevance.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for each page, especially for the FAQ and those with duplicate content.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Correct Headings Structure

    Why: Proper headings help with the page hierarchy and SEO.

    How: Add a clear H1 tag for pages missing one and remove duplicate H1s from the cocktails page.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Enhance Content Quality

    Why: Thin content may not engage users effectively.

    How: Expand content on the pages with fewer than 200 words, ensuring to provide valuable information to readers.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website www.cafecarlo.com lacks critical security headers that protect against various attacks. Implementing these security measures will enhance the site's resilience against potential vulnerabilities, particularly concerning transport security and content loading policies.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users may be intercepted on their initial non-HTTPS request.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Without CSP, there's no restriction on where scripts and resources may load from, increasing risk.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may execute files as scripts based on their content.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  4. 4

    Third-party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains could be compromised, affecting site behavior.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy which includes sources for scripts, or use Subresource Integrity (SRI).

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-menu/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-menu/dinner/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-menu/lunch/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-menu/dessert/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-menu/wine/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-menu/cocktails/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/reservations/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/faq/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-story/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/work-with-us/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 12 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-menu/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-menu/dinner/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-menu/lunch/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-menu/dessert/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-menu/wine/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-menu/cocktails/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/reservations/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/faq/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-story/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/work-with-us/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-menu/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-menu/dinner/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-menu/lunch/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-menu/dessert/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-menu/wine/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-menu/cocktails/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/reservations/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/faq/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/our-story/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.cafecarlo.com/work-with-us/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (12 script tags)
    • www.google.com (2 script tags)
9 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 12 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 12 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    2 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.cafecarlo.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.cafecarlo.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.cafecarlo.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.cafecarlo.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.