Scanned sites / www.borhotlaw.com / 2026-10-31-2139
www.borhotlaw.com scan from 2026-10-31 21:39:27 UTC DR 0
A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.borhotlaw.com.
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Scan 2026-10-31-2139
Scanned 2026-10-31 21:39:27 UTC, finished 2026-10-31 21:42:23 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass
Site: https://www.borhotlaw.com/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On October 31, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 2 pages and 49 assets of www.borhotlaw.com, starting from https://www.borhotlaw.com/. It scored 64 out of 100, a result that needs work. 8 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (2), meta descriptions (2), headings (2); 17 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−10), meta descriptions (−8), headings (−6). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium3 medium, 3 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 2
- Assets fetched
- 49
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 8 of 33
51 of 52 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 5 link destinations on other sites were checked.
- Title tags2 issues2 of 2 pages have title issues.−10 points
- Meta descriptions2 issues2 of 2 pages have meta description issues.−8 points
- Headings2 issues2 of 2 pages have heading issues.−6 points
- Broken linksOK0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
- Links to other sites2 noted0 destinations answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 5 destinations checked.
- Redirects1 noted1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
- Non-200 responses1 noted1 URL did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- IndexabilityOK0 of 2 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
- Image alt text1 issue1 of 3 image references have no alt attribute. 2 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.−2 points
- Heavy assets1 issue1 asset larger than 500 KB among 49 fetched assets.−0.6 points
- Orphan pages1 issue1 page have no internal links pointing at them.−2 points
- Sitemap coverage1 issue2 sitemaps listing 2 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.−3 points
- Internal link countsOKInternal link counts for 2 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
- Thin content1 issue1 of 2 pages have fewer than 200 words.−4 points
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL formatOKAll 2 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
- CanonicalsOK0 of 2 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives2 noted2 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
- Anchor text1 noted1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structure1 noted1 of 2 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
- Image weight and alt length1 noted1 image over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomaliesOKNo redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
- HTML and head validationOKAll 2 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
- hreflangOKNo page declares hreflang.
- Structured dataOKNo page carries structured data (2 indexable pages checked).
- Near duplicatesOKNo near duplicates among 2 pages with enough text to compare.
- Soft 404sOKNone of 2 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positions1 noted1 of 1 linked page are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
- PaginationOKNo page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
- Headers and cookiesOK0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 51 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 2 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed InsightsNot checkedNot checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
- SpellingOKNo unfamiliar lower-case words on 2 pages (English pages only).
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
2872 sites, median 80%, average 79%
www.borhotlaw.com scores 64%, higher than 8% of the 2872 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsYour site has several issues affecting performance and SEO, including redirects, missing meta descriptions, and title problems. Prioritize fixing these items for better visibility and user experience.
- 1
Fix Redirects
Why: A 301 redirect can confuse users and search engines, impacting SEO.
How: Update the sitemap reference from https://www.borhotlaw.com/sitemap.xml to the final URL https://www.borhotlaw.com/wp-sitemap.xml.
Checks: redirects
- 2
Add Meta Descriptions
Why: Missing meta descriptions can lower click-through rates from search engines.
How: Write concise meta descriptions for both pages, focusing on unique content that reflects each page's purpose.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 3
Improve Title Tags
Why: Short title tags are less effective for SEO and user clicks.
How: Update titles to be at least 30-60 characters, reflecting page content effectively.
Checks: titles
- 4
Fix Headings Structure
Why: Multiple H1s can confuse search engines about page topics.
How: Ensure each page has only one H1 and appropriately use H2 tags for subheadings.
Checks: headings
- 5
Add Alt Text to Images
Why: Image alt text is important for accessibility and SEO optimization.
How: Add descriptive alt text to the image missing an attribute on the homepage.
Checks: images-alt
- 6
Link to Orphan Page
Why: Orphaned pages are difficult for users and search engines to discover.
How: Add an internal link to the contact page from the homepage or relevant content.
Checks: orphan-pages
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlYour website lacks several important security headers, which could expose users to risks such as data interception and clickjacking. Implementing these headers will enhance your site's security and protect user data.
- 0 high
- 3 medium
- 3 low
- 1 info
- 1
Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium
Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors may be intercepted during their initial non-HTTPS request.
Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security
- 2
Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium
Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows unrestricted loading of scripts and styles, increasing XSS risk.
Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'
Evidence: Content Security Policy
- 3
Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium
Why it matters: Without this header, your site may be vulnerable to clickjacking attacks.
Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 4
Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow
Why it matters: Without this, browsers may incorrectly interpret files as scripts.
Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
Evidence: MIME sniffing protection
- 5
Missing Referrer Policy HeaderLow
Why it matters: Lack of a referrer policy may expose users' full URL to third parties.
Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer
Evidence: Referrer policy
- 6
Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow
Why it matters: Using external scripts without integrity checks increases security risks if those sources are compromised.
Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) for scripts from www.googletagmanager.com or set a CSP that restricts these sources.
Evidence: Third-party scripts
- 7
Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo
Why it matters: Publicly listing sensitive paths allows potential attackers to find and probe them.
Fix: Remove sensitive paths from robots.txt or secure them with appropriate access controls.
Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt
What the checks found
- FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.
- https://www.borhotlaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.borhotlaw.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
- FoundContent Security PolicyMedium
None of the 2 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.
- https://www.borhotlaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
- https://www.borhotlaw.com/contact-us/ → no content-security-policy
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://www.borhotlaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.borhotlaw.com/contact-us/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow
No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.
- https://www.borhotlaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
- https://www.borhotlaw.com/contact-us/ → no x-content-type-options
- FoundReferrer policyLow
No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.
- https://www.borhotlaw.com/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.borhotlaw.com/contact-us/ → no referrer-policy
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- www.googletagmanager.com (2 script tags)
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
8 checks passed, 1 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 2 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKPermissions policy
permissions-policy is set on all 2 HTML pages.
- OKSoftware version disclosure
The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKForms over HTTPS
3 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.
- OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries
1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- Not applicableCookie flags
The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near www.borhotlaw.com
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- www.beyoutifulhotyoga.comDR 1765/100 · rank 2586 · 94 pages
- www.alpinaphotography.comDR 1265/100 · rank 2586 · 134 pages
- reginadowntown.caDR 3465/100 · rank 2586 · 430 pages
- iuga.orgDR 6464/100 · rank 2619 · 1,726 pages
- www.seolium.comDR 4664/100 · rank 2619 · 5,000 pages
- picstory.caDR 764/100 · rank 2619 · 215 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.borhotlaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own www.borhotlaw.com?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.borhotlaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.