Scanned sites / www.bootsmabakery.com / 2026-09-11-1326

www.bootsmabakery.com scan from 2026-09-11 13:26:36 UTC DR 19

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.bootsmabakery.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-11-1326

Scanned 2026-09-11 13:26:36 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 21:21:00 UTC

Not a full crawl. The site rate-limited the crawler (68 requests answered 429), so the scan finished early with 337 URLs left unfetched. Results cover what was crawled.

Site: https://www.bootsmabakery.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

68/ 100Needs workNot a full crawl

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 296 pages and 329 assets of www.bootsmabakery.com, starting from https://www.bootsmabakery.com/. It scored 68 out of 100, a result that needs work. 14 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (111), heavy assets (32), sitemap coverage (126); 3 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.4), heavy assets (−6), sitemap coverage (−5.4). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
296
Assets fetched
329
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
14 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

625 of 963 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt, 337 skipped when the crawl was cut short. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 8 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags33 issues
    33 of 122 pages have title issues. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.4 points
  • Meta descriptions111 issues
    111 of 122 pages have meta description issues. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.4 points
  • Headings8 issues
    8 of 122 pages have heading issues. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.3 points
  • Broken links2 issues
    2 internal links point at 2 broken URLs.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sites1 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 8 destinations checked.
  • Redirects34 issues
    91 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −1 points
  • Non-200 responses2 issues
    101 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 92 of them are pages, 2 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limited65 issues
    67 URLs (65 pages) answered HTTP 429 on every try, so the crawler backed off and moved on without analysing them. A site that throttles crawlers this hard can throttle search engines too.
    −1.9 points
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 138 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design. 1 noindex page is listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore it.
    −0.1 points
  • Image alt text1 issue
    1 of 140 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets32 issues
    32 assets larger than 500 KB among 329 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages15 issues
    15 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage126 issues
    6 sitemaps listing 287 URLs: 4 crawled pages missing, 106 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 15 reachable only via the sitemap. 62 listed URLs not crawled within the 5000-page budget.
    −5.4 points
  • Internal link counts13 noted
    Internal link counts for 139 pages; 13 worth a look.
  • Thin content68 issues
    68 of 122 pages have fewer than 200 words. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.9 points
  • Duplicate content65 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −3.7 points
  • URL format19 noted
    19 of 296 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals16 noted
    16 of 139 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives139 noted
    139 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text10 noted
    10 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure13 noted
    13 of 122 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length1 noted
    1 image over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies65 noted
    65 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 139 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 625 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 139 pages; 51 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 58 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2328 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.bootsmabakery.com scores 68%, higher than 14% of the 2328 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 73 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 63 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites68% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website requires significant fixes, focusing on broken links, redirects, and content improvements. Prioritize resolving errors that most impact SEO.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links hinder user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove the 2 internal links pointing to broken URLs.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 101 URLs are returning errors, affecting site performance.

    How: Identify and correct or redirect the 101 URLs not returning 2xx responses.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 33 pages with title issues affect visibility and clicks.

    How: Revise titles to be unique, relevant, and within SEO best practices (max 60 characters).

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 111 pages lack descriptions, reducing search click-through rates.

    How: Add unique and compelling meta descriptions (max 160 characters) for all affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Thin Content

    Why: 68 pages with fewer than 200 words can impact user engagement and rankings.

    How: Expand content to provide value, ideally exceeding 200 words per page.

    Checks: thin-content

  6. 6

    Fix Multiple Headings

    Why: 8 pages with heading issues can confuse search engines and users.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 tag and restructure other headings appropriately.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several critical security issues, including missing headers that protect against various attacks. Implementing these headers will help safeguard your users and data. Prioritize addressing these findings to enhance your site's security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, connections can be intercepted by users who access the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains` to your server responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Lack of Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows potential script and resource loading from untrusted sources, increasing risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add the header `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';` to your HTML responses.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    No X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, your site is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header `X-Frame-Options: DENY` to your server responses.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret files as executable content.

    Fix: Add the header `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff` to your server responses.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external sources can be modified, causing potential vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Review your use of external scripts and consider implementing a CSP that includes these hosts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Public access to sensitive paths may expose your site to unauthorized probing.

    Fix: Implement proper access controls on `/wp-admin/` instead of relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/cart/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/store/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/bread/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/buns/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/cakes/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/cookies/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/donuts/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/pastries/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/weddings/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/classes/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/news-and-press/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 139 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/cart/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/store/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/bread/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/buns/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/cakes/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/cookies/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/donuts/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/pastries/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/weddings/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/classes/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/news-and-press/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/cart/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/store/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/bread/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/buns/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/cakes/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/cookies/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/donuts/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/pastries/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/weddings/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/classes/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/news-and-press/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/cart/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/store/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/bread/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/buns/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/cakes/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/cookies/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/donuts/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/pastries/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/weddings/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/classes/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bootsmabakery.com/news-and-press/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (80 script tags)
    • www.google.com (2 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 139 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    35 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.bootsmabakery.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.bootsmabakery.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.bootsmabakery.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.bootsmabakery.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.