Scanned sites / www.boisedentistryco.com / 2026-09-12-0101

www.boisedentistryco.com scan from 2026-09-12 01:01:56 UTC DR 4

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.boisedentistryco.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-0101

Scanned 2026-09-12 01:01:56 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 04:18:19 UTC

Site: https://www.boisedentistryco.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 69 pages and 738 assets of www.boisedentistryco.com, starting from https://www.boisedentistryco.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (33), title tags (23), meta descriptions (11); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−4.8), meta descriptions (−1.8). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
69
Assets fetched
738
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

807 of 807 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 42 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags23 issues
    23 of 48 pages have title issues.
    −4.8 points
  • Meta descriptions11 issues
    11 of 48 pages have meta description issues.
    −1.8 points
  • Headings11 issues
    11 of 48 pages have heading issues.
    −1.4 points
  • Broken links4 issues
    5 internal links point at 4 broken URLs.
    −1.7 points
  • Links to other sites48 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 19 destinations checked.
  • Redirects17 issues
    113 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −1.4 points
  • Non-200 responses4 issues
    117 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 21 of them are pages, 4 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.8 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 48 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt text1 issue
    1 of 5237 image references have no alt attribute. 4596 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets33 issues
    33 assets larger than 500 KB among 738 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage4 issues
    6 sitemaps listing 51 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 2 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 2 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.5 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 48 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 48 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format4 noted
    4 of 69 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 48 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives48 noted
    48 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text11 noted
    11 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure5 noted
    5 of 48 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length30 noted
    29 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies5 noted
    5 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 48 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 807 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 48 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 36 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2328 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.boisedentistryco.com scores 82%, higher than 60% of the 2328 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 73 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 63 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

There are several issues with broken links, redirects, and page descriptions that need attention to improve user experience and SEO. Here are prioritized fixes with actionable steps.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Eliminate broken links to improve user experience and SEO.

    How: Replace or remove the broken URLs found in the 'Broken links' report.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Improve site accessibility and searchability by ensuring all pages return 2xx responses.

    How: Update or remove the URLs that returned non-200 responses as listed in 'Non-200 responses'.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Revise Title Tags

    Why: Optimize for search engines with proper title lengths and keywords.

    How: Modify titles based on the issues reported in 'Title tags'. Ensure they are under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Add Missing Meta Descriptions

    Why: Enhance click-through rates from search results by adding descriptions.

    How: Provide relevant meta descriptions for pages missing them as per the 'Meta descriptions' report.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: Improve content structure and SEO by ensuring correct heading usage.

    How: Adjust pages to use only one H1 tag and organize subheadings correctly as noted in 'Headings'.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Improve Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Ensure all URLs listed in the sitemap are accessible and working.

    How: Resolve broken URLs and ensure orphan pages are linked to internally as found in 'Sitemap coverage'.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has multiple security vulnerabilities including absence of HTTP Strict Transport Security, Content Security Policy, and Clickjacking protection headers. Mixed content issues exist as well, which may expose users to interception. Additionally, a Google API key is leaked in the code. Immediate action is needed to enhance overall security.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    Why it matters: HSTS prevents interception of requests by ensuring connections are always secure.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without CSP, the site is vulnerable to XSS attacks by allowing any source for scripts and frames.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; frame-ancestors 'self'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, the site can be embedded in a frame on malicious sites, risking user actions.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: An exposed API key can lead to unauthorized usage and potential costs.

    Fix: Restrict the API key in the Google Cloud console to specific referrers.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  5. 5

    Mixed Content IssuesLow

    Why it matters: Loading resources over HTTP on HTTPS pages compromises security and user trust.

    Fix: Change the URLs of resources to use HTTPS instead of HTTP.

    Evidence: Mixed content

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/cosmetic-dentistry/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/smile-makeover/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/no-prep-veneers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/teeth-whitening/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/restorative-dentistry/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/dental-implants/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/dentures/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/dental-crowns/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/dental-bridges/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/general-dentistry/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 48 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/cosmetic-dentistry/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/smile-makeover/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/no-prep-veneers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/teeth-whitening/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/restorative-dentistry/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/dental-implants/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/dentures/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/dental-crowns/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/dental-bridges/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/general-dentistry/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/cosmetic-dentistry/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/smile-makeover/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/no-prep-veneers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/teeth-whitening/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/restorative-dentistry/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/dental-implants/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/dentures/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/dental-crowns/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/dental-bridges/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/general-dentistry/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMixed contentLow

    2091 resources on HTTPS pages are loaded over plain HTTP.

    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/ loads image http://www.boisedentistryco.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ChrisMinert-1-scaled_300x300.j…
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/ loads image http://www.boisedentistryco.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Office-Boise-e1750173720623.jpg
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/ loads image http://www.boisedentistryco.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/ZacharyTaylor-1-scaled.jpg
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/ loads image http://www.boisedentistryco.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/danielle.png
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/ loads image http://www.boisedentistryco.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/doug.png
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/ loads image http://www.boisedentistryco.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/jake.png
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/ loads image http://www.boisedentistryco.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/tiffany.png
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/ loads image http://www.boisedentistryco.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/image-14.png
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/ loads image http://www.boisedentistryco.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/image-15.png
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/ loads image http://www.boisedentistryco.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Richardbeforecrownsfullmouthre…
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/ loads image http://www.boisedentistryco.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/GloriaBeforeCrownsVeneers.jpg
    • https://www.boisedentistryco.com/ loads image http://www.boisedentistryco.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Anniebiggerpicture-682x1024.png
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…Yk (39 chars) in https://www.boisedentistryco.com/services/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (38 script tags)
    • www.google.com (2 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 48 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 48 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    28 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.boisedentistryco.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.boisedentistryco.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.boisedentistryco.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.boisedentistryco.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.