www.boiseanimalhealth.com scan from 10/18/2026, 3:42:39 PM DR 1

On October 18, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 8 pages and 174 assets of www.boiseanimalhealth.com, starting from https://www.boiseanimalhealth.com/. It scored 76 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 34 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (8), thin content (5), sitemap coverage (5); 15 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−8), thin content (−5), sitemap coverage (−3.8). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 3 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled

8

Assets fetched

174

Status

Completed

Checks with issues

9 of 34

• Title tags1 issue
  1 of 8 pages have title issues.
  −1.3 points
• Meta descriptions8 issues
  8 of 8 pages have meta description issues.
  −8 points
• Headings1 issue
  1 of 8 pages have heading issues.
  −0.8 points
• Broken linksOK
  0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
• Links to other sites1 issue
  1 destination answered with an error, 3 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 10 destinations checked.
  −0.4 points
• Redirects1 noted
  1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
• Non-200 responses2 noted
  2 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
• Rate limitedOK
  The site did not rate limit the crawler.
• IndexabilityOK
  0 of 8 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
• Image alt text8 issues
  8 of 37 image references have no alt attribute. 13 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  −1.3 points
• Heavy assets1 issue
  1 asset larger than 500 KB among 174 fetched assets.
  −0.6 points
• Orphan pages5 issues
  5 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  −2.5 points
• Sitemap coverage5 issues
  3 sitemaps listing 8 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 5 reachable only via the sitemap.
  −3.8 points
• Internal link countsOK
  Internal link counts for 8 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
• Thin content5 issues
  5 of 8 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  −5 points
• Duplicate contentOK
  0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
• URL formatOK
  All 8 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
• CanonicalsOK
  0 of 8 pages have a canonical worth checking.
• Robots directives8 noted
  8 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
• Anchor text1 noted
  1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
• Title and heading structure6 noted
  6 of 8 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
• Image weight and alt length3 noted
  3 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
• Response anomaliesOK
  No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
• HTML and head validationOK
  All 8 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
• hreflangOK
  No page declares hreflang.
• Structured dataOK
  8 of 8 indexable pages carry structured data: BreadcrumbList (8), ListItem (8), WebSite (8), Organization (8), WebPage (8). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
• Near duplicatesOK
  No near duplicates among 3 pages with enough text to compare.
• Soft 404sOK
  None of 8 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
• AccessibilityNot checked
  Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
• Link positions2 noted
  2 of 3 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
• PaginationOK
  No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
• Headers and cookies1 noted
  1 cookie set by the site, 1 missing a protective flag; 12 response headers recorded across 182 URLs.
• Orphans in searchNot checked
  Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
• Link ScoreOK
  Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 8 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
• JavaScript renderingNot checked
  Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
• PageSpeed Insights5 noted
  Mobile performance 57 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
• Spelling37 noted
  37 words an English dictionary does not know, on 6 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Loading the link map...

Written from an earlier version of the analysis (rules v5). The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site's health score is good, but there are several technical issues to fix for better SEO performance. Prioritize improving title tags, adding meta descriptions, and addressing heading issues.

1. 1

   Fix Title Tag Issues

   Why: Only one title tag is non-compliant, impacting search visibility.

   How: Reduce the length of the title tag to be under 60 characters for better readability.

   Checks: titles

2. 2

   Add Meta Descriptions

   Why: All pages missing meta descriptions are less likely to attract clicks from search results.

   How: Create unique, engaging meta descriptions for each of the 8 pages.

   Checks: meta-descriptions

3. 3

   Resolve Heading Issues

   Why: Multiple H1 tags confuse search engines and affect rankings.

   How: Ensure each page has a single, clear H1 tag summary.

   Checks: headings

4. 4

   Improve Internal Linking for Orphan Pages

   Why: 5 orphan pages lack internal links, which limits their visibility.

   How: Link to these pages from other relevant content on the site.

   Checks: orphan-pages

5. 5

   Shrink Heavy Assets

   Why: A large asset can slow down page load times, impacting user experience.

   How: Optimize or load the identified heavy assets (over 500KB) more efficiently.

   Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Sites scoring near www.boiseanimalhealth.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

• maidensail.comDR 6877/100 · rank 1304 · 200 pages
• avettstudio.lovable.appDR 9177/100 · rank 1304 · 10 pages
• www.boise-dentist.comDR 876/100 · rank 1395 · 185 pages
• arvow.comDR 5876/100 · rank 1395 · 757 pages
• niwe.caDR 2176/100 · rank 1395 · 90 pages
• intermatic.comDR 6476/100 · rank 1395 · 2,340 pages

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.